Liberal Forum

. . .
Biden making Kamala Harris president would mean she wouldn’t have to preside over the certification of her own defeat at the January 6 Joint Session of Congress.“

It would absolve her from having to oversee the January 6th transition, right, of her own defeat. And it would make sure, it would dominate the news, at a point where Democrats have to learn, drama and transparency and doing things the public want to see — this is the time, this is the moment for us to change the entire perspective of how Democrats operate,” (Jamal) Simmons told Bash.

 Simmons expanded on this idea in a series of posts on X.
“Joe Biden has been amazing but he should fulfill one last promise – to be transitional. Biden should resign and make Kamala Harris the first woman president. It’d turn tables on Trump, keep Kamala from presiding over Jan 6 make it easier for next woman to run,” Simmons wrote.

Simmons claimed Trump won because he realized today’s political environment is like show business and Democrats needed to create their own big moments to capture the American people’s attention.
 “Dems have better policies but we must realize the old rules no longer apply. We are not playing table tennis. We are in a mixed martial arts fight and Americans respond to drama and excitement. We should use that to make our arguments for a better path forward,” Simmons added.

 - Joe Biden resigning to make Kamala Harris the president for a month would sum up her career as being one that she failed upwards because she was a DEI pick in a woke political party.
 - Kamala Harris ran one of the worst campaigns in history back in 2020, dropping out of the race months before the first primary vote.
 - Biden only picked Kamala Harris as his running mate because she checked off the right identity politics boxes.
 - Harris only ended up the nominee because Biden endorsed her as soon as he dropped out of the race, realizing it would look horrible if he didn’t back his second-in-command.
 - Other Democrats didn’t want to challenge Harris because taking the nomination away from a black woman could upset the left’s coalition.

 Now making Kamala Harris the president for the express purpose of having a female face on the list of pictures of the presidents would be the ultimate unearned DEI glory.
------
excerpt Conservative Reboot article.

 
 

The desperation from the Democrats may very well follow through on this.

For the first female President, she absolutely does NOT check ANY boxes from my perspective.(other than being a woman)

More and more signs that

America is no longer a serious country.

Sumela » 15 Nov 2024, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2024, 12:01 pm

More and more signs that

America is no longer a serious country.

Oh but you forget that who WAS president is excruciatingly important.
Even if, but for a worthless month, think of how inspiring it will be 50 years from now.
There might even be a KaKa Library in Schitt's Creek. A painted portrait in the gallery.
Schools named after her on K Street.

Truly the American dream for little girls in America (should they exist...) 
The democrats can claim a real victory here.

Who would become VP?

They have too much SELF RESPECT and PRIDE to make the first female POTUS someone who was merely INSERTED into the position like a pinch runner in a season ending baseball game that doesn't matter .....RIGHT...?
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 15 Nov 2024, 5:04 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2024, 5:04 pm

They have too much SELF RESPECT and PRIDE to make the first female POTUS someone who was merely INSERTED into the position like a pinch runner in a season ending baseball game that doesn't matter .....RIGHT...?

We're still referring to politicians, no?
Not many have possession of their own spine anymore.


I am surprised some libs haven't posted any support of the idea.
What happened? A vote or sumpin'?

Fuelman » 15 Nov 2024, 8:18 am » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2024, 8:18 am

The desperation from the Democrats may very well follow through on this.

For the first female President, she absolutely does NOT check ANY boxes from my perspective.(other than being a woman)

you can't forget "of color"...then all the progressive boxes would be checked...
 

DeezerShoove » 15 Nov 2024, 3:48 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2024, 3:48 pm

Oh but you forget that who WAS president is excruciatingly important.
Even if, but for a worthless month, think of how inspiring it will be 50 years from now.
There might even be a KaKa Library in Schitt's Creek. A painted portrait in the gallery.
Schools named after her on K Street.
Truly the American dream for little girls in America (should they exist...) 
The democrats can claim a real victory here.

they'd prolly redo Lady Liberty's face to kamalatoe's...  
 

DeezerShoove » 15 Nov 2024, 7:40 am » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2024, 7:40 am

. . .
Biden making Kamala Harris president would mean she wouldn’t have to preside over the certification of her own defeat at the January 6 Joint Session of Congress.“

It would absolve her from having to oversee the January 6th transition, right, of her own defeat. And it would make sure, it would dominate the news, at a point where Democrats have to learn, drama and transparency and doing things the public want to see — this is the time, this is the moment for us to change the entire perspective of how Democrats operate,” (Jamal) Simmons told Bash.

 Simmons expanded on this idea in a series of posts on X.
“Joe Biden has been amazing but he should fulfill one last promise – to be transitional. Biden should resign and make Kamala Harris the first woman president. It’d turn tables on Trump, keep Kamala from presiding over Jan 6 make it easier for next woman to run,” Simmons wrote.

Simmons claimed Trump won because he realized today’s political environment is like show business and Democrats needed to create their own big moments to capture the American people’s attention.
 “Dems have better policies but we must realize the old rules no longer apply. We are not playing table tennis. We are in a mixed martial arts fight and Americans respond to drama and excitement. We should use that to make our arguments for a better path forward,” Simmons added.

 - Joe Biden resigning to make Kamala Harris the president for a month would sum up her career as being one that she failed upwards because she was a DEI pick in a woke political party.
 - Kamala Harris ran one of the worst campaigns in history back in 2020, dropping out of the race months before the first primary vote.
 - Biden only picked Kamala Harris as his running mate because she checked off the right identity politics boxes.
 - Harris only ended up the nominee because Biden endorsed her as soon as he dropped out of the race, realizing it would look horrible if he didn’t back his second-in-command.
 - Other Democrats didn’t want to challenge Harris because taking the nomination away from a black woman could upset the left’s coalition.

 Now making Kamala Harris the president for the express purpose of having a female face on the list of pictures of the presidents would be the ultimate unearned DEI glory.
------
excerpt Conservative Reboot article.

That's what I thought the october suprise would be but it seems there is/was something going on behind the (coup) screens that they're not talking about.. why is Biden so happy and where is Obama, shouldn't he be out consuling the depressed cackling cult..

 


 

ROG62 » 16 Nov 2024, 9:13 am » wrote: ↑

16 Nov 2024, 9:13 am

they'd prolly redo Lady Liberty's face to kamalatoe's...

That's fit nicely with The New Colossus poem slapped on the side of the base.
A dreary beckoning of dreary people topped with a cackling witch...

Don't look up.  

Jantje_Smit » 16 Nov 2024, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑

16 Nov 2024, 9:22 am

That's what I thought the october suprise would be but it seems there is/was something going on behind the (coup) screens that they're not talking about.. why is Biden so happy and where is Obama, shouldn't he be out consuling the depressed cackling cult..

 

****, even Joe is breathing a sigh of relief...
As messed up as he is, I don't think he wanted to destroy the country.
**** just got way out of hand after the we-all-know-he's-lost-it caught on for real. For insiders that would have been while he was campaigning in his basement. "They" kept that under wraps as long as possible until world leaders' snickering got so loud it was dumb to try anymore.
 

DeezerShoove » 15 Nov 2024, 3:48 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2024, 3:48 pm

Oh but you forget that who WAS president is excruciatingly important.
Even if, but for a worthless month, think of how inspiring it will be 50 years from now.
There might even be a KaKa Library in Schitt's Creek. A painted portrait in the gallery.
Schools named after her on K Street.

Truly the American dream for little girls in America (should they exist...) 
The democrats can claim a real victory here.

Yup, like I said, America is no longer a serious country.

Example: As Biden is leaving...he just authorized Ukraine to 
to use US missiles to strike deep into Russia.  Like a crazed
angry monkey throwing turds.

Sumela » 17 Nov 2024, 8:41 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 8:41 pm

Yup, like I said, America is no longer a serious country.

Example: As Biden is leaving...he just authorized Ukraine to 
to use US missiles to strike deep into Russia.  Like a crazed
angry monkey throwing turds.

Seems like there's always an intentional "set up" in the works for the next administration.
It can go good or bad.
When the next guy bitches about "inheriting a mess" that one went bad.
Biden has no reason to be nice (read: deep state has no reason to be nice).

DeezerShoove » 17 Nov 2024, 8:48 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 8:48 pm

Seems like there's always an intentional "set up" in the works for the next administration.
It can go good or bad.
When the next guy bitches about "inheriting a mess" that one went bad.
Biden has no reason to be nice (read: deep state has no reason to be nice).

Its meaningless.
Putin will do as he pleases. He knows the West cannot be trusted.
Biden, Trump...whatever.
Its a new world.
 

Sumela » 17 Nov 2024, 9:10 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 9:10 pm

Its meaningless.
Putin will do as he pleases. He knows the West cannot be trusted.
Biden, Trump...whatever.
Its a new world.

I don't actually see that as new.
But then, I wouldn't trust Putin either.

DeezerShoove » 17 Nov 2024, 9:19 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 9:19 pm

I don't actually see that as new.
But then, I wouldn't trust Putin either.

Yer behind - old paradigm.  You'll catch up one day.
 

Sumela » 17 Nov 2024, 9:40 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2024, 9:40 pm

Yer behind - old paradigm.  You'll catch up one day.

You trust a politician with a big ego?
When you reach your late teens you'll understand my skepticism.

DeezerShoove » 18 Nov 2024, 7:23 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2024, 7:23 am

You trust a politician with a big ego?
When you reach your late teens you'll understand my skepticism.

You don't have healthy skepticism.
You simply lack education, knowledge, and nuance. 
Don't beat yourself up over it though - its typical Americana.
 

Sumela » 18 Nov 2024, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2024, 11:18 am

You don't have healthy skepticism.
You simply lack education, knowledge, and nuance. 
Don't beat yourself up over it though - its typical Americana.

Your ego forces you to call everyone dumb because you have "hard to find knowledge" and your obscure sources are your bible(s).

You can't even openly admit you loathe Jews and everything about them across the globe.
Being overly honest is not a priority with you. America be bad... no matter what. Absolutely.

Going back in history to show USA foibles and faults is ok territory.
But, ****!, don't mention that stuff regarding Russia and China.
Then you're all, "Let's stay current, dummy."

Seen that multiple times, son. Typical resentful perch-sitter.