jerrab » 16 Nov 2024, 1:58 pm » wrote: ↑ the dems lost because of transgender issues. biden would have lost too. pelosi is responsible as well because she liked the changes biden and harris made to title 9 which allows boys who identify as girls to compete in girls' sports. swing states were hammered over this. and hawly won in missouri because he hammered his opponent over boys competing in girls' sports.
**** idiotthe dems lost because of transgender issues
Well you do have a point... BUT, the FACT that they (and Nancy Pelosi in particular)... orchestrated the removal of Joe Biden, and the insertion of Kamala Harris as the presidential candidate, AND THEN tried to pretend that "IT WASN'T HER"... is just a bold faced LIE. Biden was pretty solid that he WAS going to run... but he evidently had second thoughts when Nancy talked to him,a nd CONVINCED him it was for the best !jerrab » 16 Nov 2024, 1:58 pm » wrote: ↑ the dems lost because of transgender issues. biden would have lost too. pelosi is responsible as well because she liked the changes biden and harris made to title 9 which allows boys who identify as girls to compete in girls' sports. swing states were hammered over this. and hawly won in missouri because he hammered his opponent over boys competing in girls' sports.
PhiloBeddo » 16 Nov 2024, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Of all the Dems, he is one I can live with. The guy had a stroke and is recovering. He has more common sense than most of the Dems.
I believe it is THEIR business.jerrab » 16 Nov 2024, 3:57 pm » wrote: ↑ you believe boys who think they are girls are really girls.
you are the idiot.
a marauding psycho wanders around town, with oversized boots and a dark crooked smile, a bag full of tools to remove and restyle, expresses emotions with gesture and mime, will take all you've got when you've just reached your prime, no mercy or pity, as you beg and you plead, feasting on all features, as you drain and you bleed.
How is it YOUR business, asshole?SouthernFried » 16 Nov 2024, 7:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Except they intervene in everyone else’s business. Forgot that little detail, didn’t ya? Attempting to force everyone to use their “pronouns”, compete against biological females, shower/change next to them, etc….
That’s not “their business”, cocksucker.
SouthernFried » 16 Nov 2024, 7:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Except they intervene in everyone else’s business. Forgot that little detail, didn’t ya? Attempting to force everyone to use their “pronouns”, compete against biological females, shower/change next to them, etc….
That’s not “their business”, cocksucker.
There are professionals to whom that decision is delegated, freak.
Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2024, 6:25 am » wrote: ↑ There are professionals to whom that decision is delegated, freak.
Admit it...it's not them....it's your doubts...
Maybe you need to learn about schools first....SouthernFried » 17 Nov 2024, 6:38 am » wrote: ↑ What “professionals” ****? Whoopi Goldberg over at the view? Or perhaps Maddow at MSDNC? Any doctor on planet **** earth knows that biological men are stronger than girls are. Get your **** head examined, you fruitcake ****.
Have you spoken to any of these "daughters"?SouthernFried » 16 Nov 2024, 8:22 pm » wrote: ↑ It’s peoples business when their **** daughters are subjected to this ****, you little *** lover.