Liberal Forum

https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/next- ... pply-chain

Sentiment check please…

US Gov hard at work
 one tentacle poisons you via food.
 the next tentacle diagnoses, then poisons you some more with pharma.
 the next tentacle denies you coverage for your resulting health problems.

Uh…

1) It’s not the GUBMINT, it’s WALL STREET doing all 3 of those (although there isn’t much distinction these days)

How about:

———————————————

1. WALL STREET poisons you via “food” (or what passes as food in America) - Monsanto, McDonald’s + more

2. WALL STREET diagnoses, and then prescribes you pharmas to hide symptoms instead of resolving root causes (Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Abbvie, Pfizer, and more)

3. WALL STREET denies you coverage (Cigna, United, Humana)

———————————————


2) A decade ago, if “BAMMY” appointed the likes of RFK JR to oversee HHS / FDA, wouldn’t you decry that as SOSHALIZM? 

Isn’t that “GUBMINT OVERREACH?” 

We should let the free market solve the problem…by consumers boycotting products containing Red Dye #40!!   


(You guys are **** morons)
 

[Additionally, if you FAIL to understand WHY I’m laughing at the retardation resulting from adopting a **** of conflicting sympathies, you TOO may be…

R E T A R D E D]

LowIQTrash » 07 Dec 2024, 8:36 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Dec 2024, 8:36 pm

https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/next- ... pply-chain

Sentiment check please…

Uh…

1) It’s not the GUBMINT, it’s WALL STREET doing all 3 of those (although there isn’t much distinction these days)

How about:

———————————————

1. WALL STREET poisons you via “food” (or what passes as food in America) - Monsanto, McDonald’s + more

2. WALL STREET diagnoses, and then prescribes you pharmas to hide symptoms instead of resolving root causes (Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Abbvie, Pfizer, and more)

3. WALL STREET denies you coverage (Cigna, United, Humana)

———————————————

2) A decade ago, if “BAMMY” appointed the likes of RFK JR to oversee HHS / FDA, wouldn’t you decry that as SOSHALIZM? 

Isn’t that “GUBMINT OVERREACH?” 

We should let the free market solve the problem…by consumers boycotting products containing Red Dye #40!!   

(You guys are **** morons)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mh66p3EBfoo
 

LowIQTrash » 07 Dec 2024, 8:36 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Dec 2024, 8:36 pm

https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/next- ... pply-chain

Sentiment check please…

Uh…

1) It’s not the GUBMINT, it’s WALL STREET doing all 3 of those (although there isn’t much distinction these days)

How about:

———————————————

1. WALL STREET poisons you via “food” (or what passes as food in America) - Monsanto, McDonald’s + more

2. WALL STREET diagnoses, and then prescribes you pharmas to hide symptoms instead of resolving root causes (Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Abbvie, Pfizer, and more)

3. WALL STREET denies you coverage (Cigna, United, Humana)

———————————————

2) A decade ago, if “BAMMY” appointed the likes of RFK JR to oversee HHS / FDA, wouldn’t you decry that as SOSHALIZM? 

Isn’t that “GUBMINT OVERREACH?” 

We should let the free market solve the problem…by consumers boycotting products containing Red Dye #40!!   

(You guys are **** morons)

I just watched a 2015 documentary The Chocolate Diet I discovered while sifting through on-line local library offerings.
The hoax was revealed long ago but I never really knew how they set it up.
Basically they needed "peer review" for their study results. The results, not the actual study. That's key.
They had a statistician massage data sets until their needed conclusions could be reached.
Basically they didn't lie, they did do the study, control groups and double-blind protocols, they did weigh people, etc.

They determined the "formula" in getting a study to the public via some people knowledgable in that arena.
Massage data, find some peer to review, get it published, make sure media sees that publication, public embraces it.

9-10 years later people still believe dark chocolate is good for you.

-----
If 4 average people can produce this viral result,
Big Pharma and giant corporations can get away with whatever they want.
 
 

DeezerShoove » 07 Dec 2024, 11:22 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Dec 2024, 11:22 pm

I just watched a 2015 documentary The Chocolate Diet I discovered while sifting through on-line local library offerings.
The hoax was revealed long ago but I never really knew how they set it up.
Basically they needed "peer review" for their study results. The results, not the actual study. That's key.
They had a statistician massage data sets until their needed conclusions could be reached.
Basically they didn't lie, they did do the study, control groups and double-blind protocols, they did weigh people, etc.

They determined the "formula" in getting a study to the public via some people knowledgable in that arena.
Massage data, find some peer to review, get it published, make sure media sees that publication, public embraces it.

9-10 years later people still believe dark chocolate is good for you.

-----
If 4 average people can produce this viral result,
Big Pharma and giant corporations can get away with whatever they want.

Sounds like when statins came out...

100 test subjects...50 statin / 50 placebo...

at end of trial, 1 statin dead / 2 placebo dead...

"tests show statins reduce risk of death by 50%..."

well, it's like, holy ****, 100 people? WTF?
 

LowIQTrash » 07 Dec 2024, 8:36 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Dec 2024, 8:36 pm

https://www.zerohedge.com/mediWhatcal/next-few-weeks-fda-verge-possible-toxic-red-dye-ban-across-americas-food-supply-chain

Sentiment check please…

Uh…

1) It’s not the GUBMINT, it’s WALL STREET doing all 3 of those (although there isn’t much distinction these days)

How about:

———————————————

1. WALL STREET poisons you via “food” (or what passes as food in America) - Monsanto, McDonald’s + more

2. WALL STREET diagnoses, and then prescribes you pharmas to hide symptoms instead of resolving root causes (Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Abbvie, Pfizer, and more)

3. WALL STREET denies you coverage (Cigna, United, Humana)

———————————————

2) A decade ago, if “BAMMY” appointed the likes of RFK JR to oversee HHS / FDA, wouldn’t you decry that as SOSHALIZM? 

Isn’t that “GUBMINT OVERREACH?” 

We should let the free market solve the problem…by consumers boycotting products containing Red Dye #40!!   

(You guys are **** morons)

What always drove me up a tree is the sheer "Hippcrasy" on both sides..

When they are in power spend trillions of mores dollars 2 the National Debt but thats okay we $pent that 4 our interests & purposes so thats good & hey the other party did same when they were in power too..

Ever watch those Sundays shows do the network circuit.

The Guy on Fox or CBS will go over Abc or NBC for an interview and give roughly the same answers, lines, & talking points "Verbatim" across all Tv Stations.

Same on Talk Radio on the Am Dial too.

Where is the freaking "Integrity" anymore it aint neither the Deomocrats or Republicans both are "Bought" $old & Paid 4 by their "Donor Interests"

 
 

ROG62 » 08 Dec 2024, 12:45 am » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2024, 12:45 am

Sounds like when statins came out...

100 test subjects...50 statin / 50 placebo...

at end of trial, 1 statin dead / 2 placebo dead...

"tests show statins reduce risk of death by 50%..."

well, it's like, holy ****, 100 people? WTF?

For The Chocolate Diet study they used 16 people. They were not in on the hoax.

DeezerShoove » 08 Dec 2024, 1:45 am » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2024, 1:45 am

For The Chocolate Diet study they used 16 people. They were not in on the hoax.

Good grief...

TwoIfByTea » 08 Dec 2024, 1:03 am » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2024, 1:03 am

What always drove me up a tree is the sheer "Hippcrasy" on both sides..

When they are in power spend trillions of mores dollars 2 the National Debt but thats okay we $pent that 4 our interests & purposes so thats good & hey the other party did same when they were in power too..

Ever watch those Sundays shows do the network circuit.

The Guy on Fox or CBS will go over Abc or NBC for an interview and give roughly the same answers, lines, & talking points "Verbatim" across all Tv Stations.

Same on Talk Radio on the Am Dial too.

Where is the freaking "Integrity" anymore it aint neither the Deomocrats or Republicans both are "Bought" $old & Paid 4 by their "Donor Interests"

Highest bidder = winner

DeezerShoove » 07 Dec 2024, 11:22 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Dec 2024, 11:22 pm

I just watched a 2015 documentary The Chocolate Diet I discovered while sifting through on-line local library offerings.
The hoax was revealed long ago but I never really knew how they set it up.
Basically they needed "peer review" for their study results. The results, not the actual study. That's key.
They had a statistician massage data sets until their needed conclusions could be reached.
Basically they didn't lie, they did do the study, control groups and double-blind protocols, they did weigh people, etc.

They determined the "formula" in getting a study to the public via some people knowledgable in that arena.
Massage data, find some peer to review, get it published, make sure media sees that publication, public embraces it.

9-10 years later people still believe dark chocolate is good for you.

-----
If 4 average people can produce this viral result,
Big Pharma and giant corporations can get away with whatever they want.

I eat chocolate only on occasion (like when I pass thru the Swiss airport) but my understanding is cacao absorbs a lot of heavy metals in our soils, both naturally occurring and spread by human activity.

LowIQTrash » 08 Dec 2024, 2:06 am » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2024, 2:06 am

Highest bidder = winner

And thats exactly how we run our Government too from the Fedral in Wash/Dc down 2 the City, County, & State Level too.

Our politicians dont really care about the people The Moneyed up Interests fund theor election & tell them what 2 do and what legislation shall be passed.

Dont tow their line theyll find sombody else & "Primary" ya next election season

TwoIfByTea » 08 Dec 2024, 2:13 am » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2024, 2:13 am

And thats exactly how we run our Government too from the Fedral in Wash/Dc down 2 the City, County, & State Level too.

Our politicians dont really care about the people The Moneyed up Interests fund theor election & tell them what 2 do and what legislation shall be passed.

Dont tow their line theyll find sombody else & "Primary" ya next election season

This aint exclusive to Democrats or Republicans neither they both run the same scams
 
Where it gets "Dicey" is oh thats our guy & thats okay too because the other side did the same exact thingy.

Im sorry thats not an "Excuse" in my book

Where is the "Integrity" who gonna stand up do the "Right Thing" because thats really good 4 the People & Nation

TwoIfByTea » 08 Dec 2024, 2:13 am » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2024, 2:13 am

And thats exactly how we run our Government too from the Fedral in Wash/Dc down 2 the City, County, & State Level too.

Our politicians dont really care about the people The Moneyed up Interests fund theor election & tell them what 2 do and what legislation shall be passed.

Dont tow their line theyll find sombody else & "Primary" ya next election season

No money, no honey…

Been like that since the Founding Fathers 

That’s why FOS used to support monarchism
 

LowIQTrash » 08 Dec 2024, 2:21 am » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2024, 2:21 am

No money, no honey…

Been like that since the Founding Fathers 

That’s why FOS used to support monarchism

But did not our "Forfathers"address this in the Constitution & Bill Of Rights.

I know they still allowed "Slavery" in the South but they had too at that time get the Souths support so they called a black person 1/3rd a human being then about 80/90 years later the "Civil War" broke out and after that we had Antibellum & Segragation another 75 years or so

LowIQTrash » 08 Dec 2024, 2:21 am » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2024, 2:21 am

No money, no honey…

That also reminds me an old Willie Nelson tune.

Ya got the $$$ well I got the time.

Lets take youre Caddillac to the Hardware Store leave my old wreck behind.

Well go "Honky Tonking" & we wont fool around.

Ya got the $$$ honey I got some time.

https://youtu.be/W8KP-z68DF4?feature=shared

 
 

Here I know its The Cosby Show but learn something about $$$ in Monopoly $$$

Cliff Huxtable laid down the law with Theo too..

Please note this was back the 1980s prices & money were different back then

https://youtu.be/TZ8QvafmUcw?feature=shared
 
 

TwoIfByTea » 08 Dec 2024, 2:29 am » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2024, 2:29 am

But did not our "Forfathers"address this in the Constitution & Bill Of Rights.

I know they still allowed "Slavery" in the South but they had too at that time get the Souths support so they called a black person 1/3rd a human being then about 80/90 years later the "Civil War" broke out and after that we had Antibellum & Segragation another 75 years or so

And the Constitution & BoR is exactly what led us to our current situation today. @FOS  even wrote about the fatal flaws of this many times.

The Constitution was designed to limit federal power. The problem is that it did NOTHING to limit / address the accumulation of power into PRIVATE hands. Our entire system is run like a mafia, except mafias in countries like Italy are WELL AWARE of their duties / purposes. 

Here, we pretend because there's a Chase bank, McDonalds, and Walmart on every street corner, it's freeDUMB. We pretend that because we have one of the highest GDP/capita in the word, it's freeDUMB (when most of that "GDP" is just money / asset / liquidity shuffling). 
 

LowIQTrash » 08 Dec 2024, 2:08 am » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2024, 2:08 am

I eat chocolate only on occasion (like when I pass thru the Swiss airport) but my understanding is cacao absorbs a lot of heavy metals in our soils, both naturally occurring and spread by human activity.

If it absorbs a lot of heavy metals, a steady diet may rid your *** of the lead deposits.....bon apetif, Milk Dud.

DeezerShoove » 07 Dec 2024, 11:22 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Dec 2024, 11:22 pm

I just watched a 2015 documentary The Chocolate Diet I discovered while sifting through on-line local library offerings.
The hoax was revealed long ago but I never really knew how they set it up.
Basically they needed "peer review" for their study results. The results, not the actual study. That's key.
They had a statistician massage data sets until their needed conclusions could be reached.
Basically they didn't lie, they did do the study, control groups and double-blind protocols, they did weigh people, etc.

They determined the "formula" in getting a study to the public via some people knowledgable in that arena.
Massage data, find some peer to review, get it published, make sure media sees that publication, public embraces it.

9-10 years later people still believe dark chocolate is good for you.

-----
If 4 average people can produce this viral result,
Big Pharma and giant corporations can get away with whatever they want.

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10 ... 116.005162

Originally Published 29 November 2017


Effects of Dark Chocolate and Almonds on Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Overweight and Obese Individuals: A Randomized Controlled‐Feeding Trial
 

Blackvegetable » 08 Dec 2024, 9:13 am » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2024, 9:13 am

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10 ... 116.005162

Originally Published 29 November 2017

Effects of Dark Chocolate and Almonds on Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Overweight and Obese Individuals: A Randomized Controlled‐Feeding Trial

stop posting **** lies