Liberal Forum

I guess the guy was also involved in insider trading. That is speculation, but it seems new info is coming to light about that. Either way, at what point, if there is one at all,  is it ok to celebrate the murder of a person based on their deeds? We may justify it by saying that things will now change for the better. However, it's highly unlikely anything will change. There will be no policy changes and private insurances will still deny claims that should be accepted. They will replace the CEO ASAP and things will go back to how they always were. 

My take on this is that I am unsure. I never encourage death upon someone else. However, I am not going to weep either. Therefore, I don't support the act, but I don't exactly feel bad about it either. 
 

I guess his family has been receiving bomb threats now. That's just wrong...but sins of the father. Just saying. It's unacceptable that his family is suffering, but sadly it can be expected.

https://youtu.be/W4rR-OsTNCg?si=kRc_hALxaHmMpkLH

Blackvegetable » 09 Dec 2024, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Dec 2024, 12:11 pm

https://youtu.be/W4rR-OsTNCg?si=kRc_hALxaHmMpkLH

they will be bringing you out soon enough

Vegas » 08 Dec 2024, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2024, 12:06 pm

I guess the guy was also involved in insider trading. That is speculation, but it seems new info is coming to light about that. Either way, at what point, if there is one at all,  is it ok to celebrate the murder of a person based on their deeds? We may justify it by saying that things will now change for the better. However, it's highly unlikely anything will change. There will be no policy changes and private insurances will still deny claims that should be accepted. They will replace the CEO ASAP and things will go back to how they always were. 

My take on this is that I am unsure. I never encourage death upon someone else. However, I am not going to weep either. Therefore, I don't support the act, but I don't exactly feel bad about it either.

You used the word "celebrate".
I do not celebrate the murder of another.
So my vote reflects that. I also do not give a **** that he's dead.

Some people die dragging unconscious children from a burning orphanage.
Some people die because their goal is to climb the ladder of an insurance company.

One is selfless courage.

Blackvegetable » 09 Dec 2024, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Dec 2024, 12:11 pm

https://youtu.be/W4rR-OsTNCg?si=kRc_hALxaHmMpkLH

No thoughts, etc...copy/paste. 

 

Depends on if the CEO was Jewish.

Vegas » 08 Dec 2024, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2024, 12:06 pm

I guess the guy was also involved in insider trading. That is speculation, but it seems new info is coming to light about that. Either way, at what point, if there is one at all,  is it ok to celebrate the murder of a person based on their deeds? We may justify it by saying that things will now change for the better. However, it's highly unlikely anything will change. There will be no policy changes and private insurances will still deny claims that should be accepted. They will replace the CEO ASAP and things will go back to how they always were. 

My take on this is that I am unsure. I never encourage death upon someone else. However, I am not going to weep either. Therefore, I don't support the act, but I don't exactly feel bad about it either.

Americans are free to use other insurance companies for their healthcare. If you don't like health insurance, don't use it and negotiate your own prices.

I'm not jumping up and down for joy...but he was at the very top of a system that has helped to ruin many lives due to greed.

Str8tEdge » 09 Dec 2024, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Dec 2024, 1:43 pm

Americans are free to use other insurance companies for their healthcare. If you don't like health insurance, don't use it and negotiate your own prices.

False reasoning. This wouldn't be fallacious if the other insurance companies weren't just as bad. 

Vegas » 08 Dec 2024, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2024, 12:06 pm

I guess the guy was also involved in insider trading. That is speculation, but it seems new info is coming to light about that. Either way, at what point, if there is one at all,  is it ok to celebrate the murder of a person based on their deeds? We may justify it by saying that things will now change for the better. However, it's highly unlikely anything will change. There will be no policy changes and private insurances will still deny claims that should be accepted. They will replace the CEO ASAP and things will go back to how they always were. 

My take on this is that I am unsure. I never encourage death upon someone else. However, I am not going to weep either. Therefore, I don't support the act, but I don't exactly feel bad about it either.

Sources are saying he was a Brown Starfish Alumni.......sounds like he could be friends with BV. They both lettered in college.....got the varsity jacket with BS stitched on it.

Vegas » 09 Dec 2024, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Dec 2024, 2:49 pm

False reasoning. This wouldn't be fallacious if the other insurance companies weren't just as bad.

You don’t need health insurance to get healthcare…..

They caught the guy! Turned in by a McDonald's employee no less.

Don't look down on me and my happy dance when this guy gets shived in prison.

Fuelman » 09 Dec 2024, 4:49 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Dec 2024, 4:49 pm

They caught the guy! Turned in by a McDonald's employee no less.

Don't look down on me and my happy dance when this guy gets shived in prison.

I am looking down on you because you didn't vote that Biden weas a senile pedo. 

Vegas » 08 Dec 2024, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2024, 12:06 pm

I guess the guy was also involved in insider trading. That is speculation, but it seems new info is coming to light about that. Either way, at what point, if there is one at all,  is it ok to celebrate the murder of a person based on their deeds? We may justify it by saying that things will now change for the better. However, it's highly unlikely anything will change. There will be no policy changes and private insurances will still deny claims that should be accepted. They will replace the CEO ASAP and things will go back to how they always were. 

My take on this is that I am unsure. I never encourage death upon someone else. However, I am not going to weep either. Therefore, I don't support the act, but I don't exactly feel bad about it either.

The shooters wealthy family owns a country club and wait for it ....
a Nursing Home empire ....
His motivation may have began during covid ....


 

Majik » 10 Dec 2024, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑

10 Dec 2024, 8:31 am

The shooters wealthy family owns a country club and wait for it ....
a Nursing Home empire ....
His motivation may have began during covid ....

Wouldn't he have shot Cuomo, then?

RebelGator » 10 Dec 2024, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑

10 Dec 2024, 8:34 am

Wouldn't he have shot Cuomo, then?

There was an undisclosed  kill list found with his manifesto.
Cuomo may have been on it ....

 

Majik » 10 Dec 2024, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑

10 Dec 2024, 8:37 am

There was an undisclosed  kill list found with his manifesto.
Cuomo may have been on it ....

The fact authorities work at suppressing these manifestos indicate to me......not that they don't want to encourage the nutjobs by releasing  them, but rather are hiding something that runs contrary to their agenda.

Vegas » 08 Dec 2024, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2024, 12:06 pm

I guess the guy was also involved in insider trading. That is speculation, but it seems new info is coming to light about that. Either way, at what point, if there is one at all,  is it ok to celebrate the murder of a person based on their deeds? We may justify it by saying that things will now change for the better. However, it's highly unlikely anything will change. There will be no policy changes and private insurances will still deny claims that should be accepted. They will replace the CEO ASAP and things will go back to how they always were. 

My take on this is that I am unsure. I never encourage death upon someone else. However, I am not going to weep either. Therefore, I don't support the act, but I don't exactly feel bad about it either.

I'd be very interested to learn more about this guy.  
I read online just last night that he was scheduled to go to court next week to testify regarding the insider trading done by Nancy Pelosi, but I've heard nothing about that and can't confirm it.  If it were true, there's a good chance this guy was murdered to prevent that. 
And we all know how close Pelosi is to Hillary and her tactics used to eliminate "problems" like that!
 

Zeets2 » 10 Dec 2024, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑

10 Dec 2024, 9:57 am

I'd be very interested to learn more about this guy.  
I read online just last night that he was scheduled to go to court next week to testify regarding the insider trading done by Nancy Pelosi, but I've heard nothing about that and can't confirm it.  If it were true, there's a good chance this guy was murdered to prevent that. 
And we all know how close Pelosi is to Hillary and her tactics used to eliminate "problems" like that!

That is interesting. I think there is more to this case. It's going to be interesting to follow.