Liberal Forum

The narrative of events coming out of the consistent testimony heard from witnesses before the Jan 6th Commission constitute the facts of the matter, as currently known.

There are no competing facts....only chafed peepees from all the wishful stroking.

The only people who could contradict it declined to speak under oath.

This is to strip away any delusions about what happens when Grifty MUST speak under a threat of perjury.

 https://youtu.be/pbFIXcsgdCc?si=e93pKR3zONkzJY9c


The man is a bona fide moron.

 

Blackvegetable » 13 Dec 2024, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2024, 2:37 pm

The narrative of events coming out of the consistent testimony heard from witnesses before the Jan 6th Commission constitute the facts of the matter, as currently known.

There are no competing facts....only chafed peepees from all the wishful stroking.

The only people who could contradict it declined to speak under oath.

This is to strip away any delusions about what happens when Grifty MUST speak under a threat of perjury.

 https://youtu.be/pbFIXcsgdCc?si=e93pKR3zONkzJY9c

The man is a bona fide moron.

You are the imbecile that keeps diverting with it.  

Even if he is a moron to you he is "Mr. President".

Quit living in the past

Blackvegetable » 13 Dec 2024, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2024, 2:37 pm

The narrative of events coming out of the consistent testimony heard from witnesses before the Jan 6th Commission constitute the facts of the matter, as currently known.

There are no competing facts....only chafed peepees from all the wishful stroking.

The only people who could contradict it declined to speak under oath.

This is to strip away any delusions about what happens when Grifty MUST speak under a threat of perjury.

 https://youtu.be/pbFIXcsgdCc?si=e93pKR3zONkzJY9c

The man is a bona fide moron.

When do you plan on posting evidence that he raped her...?
I would love to see your reaction if you were the one convicted of rape with nothing more than the testimony of your accuser and of those who weren't even there.

Blave, you have a P.m. waiting for weeks for you
@Blackvegetable 
 

IT's time for some TDS reinforcement.....on your mark...get set....meltdownnnnnnnnnnn....

*GHETTOBLASTER » 13 Dec 2024, 3:05 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2024, 3:05 pm

When do you plan on posting evidence that he raped her...?
I would love to see your reaction if you were the one convicted of rape with nothing more than the testimony of your accuser and of those who weren't even there.

Anybody that even came close to "rape" with that weird sow was doing it out of pity.
...and the ingrate waits years to notice he didn't call back.

This entire thing is theater. Only assholes think it ever had legs.

DeezerShoove » 13 Dec 2024, 5:45 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2024, 5:45 pm

Anybody that even came close to "rape" with that weird sow was doing it out of pity.
...and the ingrate waits years to notice he didn't call back.

This entire thing is theater. Only assholes think it ever had legs.

It went to a jury...


What are you, a **** idiot?

Instead of yapping, watch the video to figure out why he didn't take the stand.
 

Blackvegetable » 13 Dec 2024, 5:52 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2024, 5:52 pm

It went to a jury...

What are you, a **** idiot?

Instead of yapping, watch the video to figure out why he didn't take the stand.

And on the question of rape, the jury said "NO!"
 
 
 

Buck Naked » 13 Dec 2024, 3:01 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2024, 3:01 pm

Quit living in the past

Living doesn't exceed total sum of evolving reached so far.

Blackvegetable » 13 Dec 2024, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2024, 2:37 pm

The narrative of events coming out of the consistent testimony heard from witnesses before the Jan 6th Commission constitute the facts of the matter, as currently known.

There are no competing facts....only chafed peepees from all the wishful stroking.

The only people who could contradict it declined to speak under oath.

This is to strip away any delusions about what happens when Grifty MUST speak under a threat of perjury.

 https://youtu.be/pbFIXcsgdCc?si=e93pKR3zONkzJY9c

The man is a bona fide moron.

That's because The Dems let JAMES GOLDSTON write the Script for their fake enquiry....
again ...

You prove how easily manipulated you are by a Hollywood producer ....

 

Blackvegetable » 13 Dec 2024, 5:52 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2024, 5:52 pm

It went to a jury...and was ACQUITTED of rape...

What are you, a **** idiot?

Instead of yapping, watch the video to figure out why he didn't take the stand.

FIFY, clinger...
 
 

Blackvegetable » 13 Dec 2024, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2024, 2:37 pm

The narrative of events coming out of the consistent testimony heard from witnesses before the Jan 6th Commission constitute the facts of the matter, as currently known.

There are no competing facts....only chafed peepees from all the wishful stroking.

The only people who could contradict it declined to speak under oath.

This is to strip away any delusions about what happens when Grifty MUST speak under a threat of perjury.

 https://youtu.be/pbFIXcsgdCc?si=e93pKR3zONkzJY9c

The man is a bona fide moron.

JANUARY 6TH COMMITEE


 

ROG62 » 13 Dec 2024, 7:34 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2024, 7:34 pm

I'm too stupid to sweat unassisted.

Tru dat.
 

Blackvegetable » 13 Dec 2024, 8:48 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2024, 8:48 pm

Tru dat.

And they said no to rape....


 

*Huey » 13 Dec 2024, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2024, 2:58 pm

You are the imbecile that keeps diverting with it.  

Even if he is a moron to you he is "Mr. President".

Have either of you gotten any smarter?


 

AtticusFinch » 13 Dec 2024, 8:50 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2024, 8:50 pm

And they said no to rape....

Actually, no.

He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

but you can't avert your eyes from what's "recounted below"....obviously.
 

Blackvegetable » 13 Dec 2024, 8:58 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2024, 8:58 pm

Actually, no.

He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

but you can't avert your eyes from what's "recounted below"....obviously.

That is not the jury verdict.  Do you need someone to post the actual jury verdict form...AGAIN?
 

ConsRule » 13 Dec 2024, 9:05 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2024, 9:05 pm

That is not the jury verdict.  Do you need someone to post the actual jury verdict form...AGAIN?

Yea...it is, actually...

That was the point of Team Grifty's petition.

Which was not addressed to the jury, or you.

 

Blackvegetable » 13 Dec 2024, 9:08 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2024, 9:08 pm

Yea...it is, actually...

That was the point of Team Grifty's petition.

Which was not addressed to the jury, or you.
 

No, it isn't.  Below is the link to the actual verdict form turned in by the jury.  Tell us their answer to question #1.

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/0 ... l-00096059