Liberal Forum

ConsRule » 13 Dec 2024, 9:12 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2024, 9:12 pm

No, it isn't.  Below is the link to the actual verdict form turned in by the jury.  Tell us their answer to question #1.

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/0 ... l-00096059

Do you believe the judge is unfamiliar with that form?


 

Blackvegetable » 13 Dec 2024, 9:14 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2024, 9:14 pm

Do you believe the judge is unfamiliar with that form?

What I believe is irrelevant.  You didn't answer the question, but so far have asked one question while avoiding answering.  Just a couple of days ago, you were whining about people asking questions rather than answering them.  Hypocrite much?
 

Blackvegetable » 13 Dec 2024, 9:14 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2024, 9:14 pm

Do you believe the judge is unfamiliar with that form?

Why don't you post a link to his entire filing.  I know there are a few words in it you are going to dislike reading.

Blackvegetable » 13 Dec 2024, 5:52 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2024, 5:52 pm

It went to a jury...

What are you, a **** idiot?

Instead of yapping, watch the video to figure out why he didn't take the stand.

Theater. Finish your popcorn, piece of ****.

Blackvegetable » 13 Dec 2024, 8:48 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2024, 8:48 pm

I'm too stupid to sweat unassisted.
Tru dat.

^^^ your words...  

ConsRule » 13 Dec 2024, 9:12 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2024, 9:12 pm

No, it isn't.  Below is the link to the actual verdict form turned in by the jury.  Tell us their answer to question #1.

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/0 ... l-00096059

Careful...!
Once you get him cornered he'll run out of ways to defend his ridiculous beliefs and then he'll whip out his favorite photo of Roy Cohn  with what the totally delusional POS claims is Donald Trump.
I think BV hopes that  if he keeps posting that silly photo [that looks nothing like Trump]...repeating his totally ridiculous lie might be enough to convince some of us that it REALLY IS TRUMP.....   

 
 
 

Blackvegetable » 13 Dec 2024, 8:56 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2024, 8:56 pm

Have either of you gotten any smarter?

Again, you are the Retardo who keeps going there.  YOU bring it up.  

Blackvegetable » 13 Dec 2024, 5:52 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2024, 5:52 pm

It went to a jury...

What are you, a **** idiot?

Instead of yapping, watch the video to figure out why he didn't take the stand.

Civil, not criminal.

Blackvegetable » 13 Dec 2024, 8:56 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2024, 8:56 pm

Have either of you gotten any smarter?

Where did you hear that?  You are over using it.
 

Blackvegetable » 13 Dec 2024, 8:58 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2024, 8:58 pm

AtticusFinch » 13 Dec 2024, 8:50 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2024, 8:50 pm

And they said no to rape....

Actually, no.

He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

but you can't avert your eyes from what's "recounted below"....obviously.
 

 

Not what the jury said.  And not according to NY Law.  I guess the question is WHEN are you going to get any smarter?  Must be a bitch having a daughter who is exponentially smarter tha. You and Takes pity on her retard father.

ConsRule » 13 Dec 2024, 9:46 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2024, 9:46 pm

What I believe is irrelevant.  You didn't answer the question, but so far have asked one question while avoiding answering.  Just a couple of days ago, you were whining about people asking questions rather than answering them.  Hypocrite much?

Because your question is irrelevant. 

Proceed to piss your smalls now.
 

*Huey » 14 Dec 2024, 6:11 am » wrote: ↑

14 Dec 2024, 6:11 am

Not what the jury said.  And not according to NY Law.  I guess the question is WHEN are you going to get any smarter?  Must be a bitch having a daughter who is exponentially smarter tha. You and Takes pity on her retard father.

Take the L....get on with your life..



the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

ConsRule » 13 Dec 2024, 9:47 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Dec 2024, 9:47 pm

Why don't you post a link to his entire filing.  I know there are a few words in it you are going to dislike reading.

Start a thread.

Blackvegetable » 14 Dec 2024, 8:15 am » wrote: ↑

14 Dec 2024, 8:15 am

Take the L....get on with your life..



the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

 

There is no L for me to take/

*Huey » 14 Dec 2024, 6:09 am » wrote: ↑

14 Dec 2024, 6:09 am

Where did you hear that?  You are over using it.

Admit that you can't watch the video.

*Huey » 14 Dec 2024, 6:08 am » wrote: ↑

14 Dec 2024, 6:08 am

Civil, not criminal.

Irrelevant 

*Huey » 14 Dec 2024, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑

14 Dec 2024, 8:23 am

There is no L for me to take/

Why you are The Undefeeeeeeeeted!

The judge is irrelevant. 
Words don't mean what you think they mean.
Numbers don't tell the story.
 

Blackvegetable » 14 Dec 2024, 8:24 am » wrote: ↑

14 Dec 2024, 8:24 am

Irrelevant 

 

LMAO!  THe burden of proof is much lower in a civil trial.  

*Huey » 14 Dec 2024, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑

14 Dec 2024, 8:39 am

LMAO!  THe burden of proof is much lower in a civil trial.

Your word games notwithstanding, a burden of proof remains.


 

Blackvegetable » 14 Dec 2024, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑

14 Dec 2024, 9:10 am

Your word games notwithstanding, a burden of proof remains.

Not my word games:


In a recent blog, we discussed the burden of proof in a criminal case, which is proving guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The burden is lower in civil cases, such as when someone sues someone else.

 Unlike in criminal cases, where the government alleges that someone (a defendant) committed a crime, civil cases allow a person or entity to bring a lawsuit against another person or entity. The person starting the lawsuit is referred to as the plaintiff, while the person being sued is called the defendant. Typically, when a plaintiff sues a defendant, the plaintiff alleges that the defendant did something unlawful, whether it was acting negligently, breaching a contract, or violating a person’s constitutional rights.

https://www.msdeltalaw.com/blog/2023/ju ... vil-case-/