Liberal Forum

****  democrats lose now they want to do away with the laws of the land. 

Dems push drastic move that Mike Lee calls 'a phenomenally bad idea' | Fox News

I just read that

They're going to start that BS again?

FJB » 17 Dec 2024, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 8:40 am

****  democrats lose now they want to do away with the laws of the land. 

Dems push drastic move that Mike Lee calls 'a phenomenally bad idea' | Fox News

If they can't abolish the EC..then they will continue allow tens of millions of Illegal Aliens to invade the USA then grant all Illegal Aliens EZ citizenship / voter's rights.
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 17 Dec 2024, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 8:58 am

If they can't abolish the EC..then they will continue allow tens of millions of Illegal Aliens to invade the USA then grant all Illegal Aliens EZ citizenship / voter's rights.

agree

**** em they have no power right? Don’t cave mfers
 

Declare the DNC a terrorist organization and eliminate them.

FJB » 17 Dec 2024, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 8:40 am

****  democrats lose now they want to do away with the laws of the land. 

Dems push drastic move that Mike Lee calls 'a phenomenally bad idea' | Fox News

They don't want to get rid of law of the land written in context instead of chromosomes among the lifetimes streaming ancestral DNA 5 generation gaps deep in each ancestral lineage alive daily one ancestor at a time in series parallel time today.

Again series parallel positions exist spontaneously separate simultaneously occupying time each rotation here since their fertilized cell arrived at inception of homo sapiens lived so far.

They lose they want to change the rules losers

FJB » 17 Dec 2024, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 8:40 am

****  democrats lose now they want to do away with the laws of the land. 

Dems push drastic move that Mike Lee calls 'a phenomenally bad idea' | Fox News

It would get struck down anyway as it'll violate the 22nd amendment and by the time Trump forces voter ID and proof of citizenship? Democrats will never win another popular vote anyway,        

FJB » 17 Dec 2024, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 8:40 am

****  democrats lose now they want to do away with the laws of the land. 

Dems push drastic move that Mike Lee calls 'a phenomenally bad idea' | Fox News

Of course they do...they'll stop at nothing for absolute power...ask harry Reid how that worked out...  
 

PhiloBeddo » 17 Dec 2024, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 2:08 pm

Declare the DNC a terrorist organization and eliminate them.

Great idea....

Str8tEdge » 17 Dec 2024, 5:54 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 5:54 pm

It would get struck down anyway as it'll violate the 22nd amendment and by the time Trump forces voter ID and proof of citizenship? Democrats will never win another popular vote anyway,      

"In 2000, before the general election, I introduced a bipartisan resolution to amend the Constitution and abolish the Electoral College. I still believe today that it is time to retire this 18th century invention that disenfranchises millions of Americans,"


ironically, it was instituted because of those being disenfranchised... I guess it's ok if it's "the other guy..."
 

ROG62 » 17 Dec 2024, 6:31 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 6:31 pm

"In 2000, before the general election, I introduced a bipartisan resolution to amend the Constitution and abolish the Electoral College. I still believe today that it is time to retire this 18th century invention that disenfranchises millions of Americans,"

ironically, it was instituted because of those being disenfranchised... I guess it's ok if it's "the other guy..."

Liberals want mob rule because they think that they are the mob. 
But they won't be forever. 

Have you noticed they are no longer talking about expanding the court, and eliminating the Filibuster?
Gee, I wonder why?
 

I have wrote about this before and so not going to repeat myself ad nauseum. In short, there is a logical and mathematical basis for the electoral college. Yes, it would have helped HRC to win in 2016 had it not been in place. However, look at the bigger historical picture and it makes sense.. at least to me it does.

golfboy » 17 Dec 2024, 7:41 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 7:41 pm

Liberals want mob rule because they think that they are the mob. 
But they won't be forever. 

Have you noticed they are no longer talking about expanding the court, and eliminating the Filibuster?
Gee, I wonder why?

This week...

Empires always die.....

Str8tEdge » 17 Dec 2024, 5:54 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 5:54 pm

It would get struck down anyway as it'll violate the 22nd amendment and by the time Trump forces voter ID and proof of citizenship? Democrats will never win another popular vote anyway, :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:  

Corruption hasn't been corrected yet. Nobody except myself is explaining how corruption got what it became globally within this species today.

Test

FJB » 17 Dec 2024, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 8:40 am

****  democrats lose now they want to do away with the laws of the land. 

Dems push drastic move that Mike Lee calls 'a phenomenally bad idea' | Fox News

What is the difference between doing away with the laws and fundamentally changing the meaning of the laws in place? Neither way does life get honestly described by any political party, spiritual group, economic level of rank as ancestrally here any of the current 5 generation gaps living making up total population living forward now specifically placed in this atmosphere in the generation gap achieved after birth.