Yes. that is PRECISELY what the little greek did - and then he coughed up a million dollars.
He didn't...Cannonpointer » 22 Dec 2024, 8:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes. that is PRECISELY what the little greek did - and then he coughed up a million dollars.
ConsRule » 22 Dec 2024, 8:06 pm » wrote: ↑ That snip is from a ruling on the appeal of the award...it was NOT a ruling on the accusations made by Carroll. The jury had already done that. You also seem to ignore the following from page 3 of the filing.
The jury’s unanimous verdict in Carroll II was almost entirely in favor of Ms. Carroll. The only point on which Ms. Carroll did not prevail was whether she had proved that Mr. Trump had “raped” her within the narrow, technical meaning of a particular section of the New York Penal Law
The jury ruled Trump did not rape Carroll under NY Law...the ONLY law that is applicable in the case. Kaplan apparently searched until he found a definition he liked more than the law he swore to uphold as a judge. You will need to ask him why he chose to ignore NY law when it had no bearing on the amount of the award. Many feel his focus on an issue that was not part of the award (which was the reason for his filing) and going outside the applicable law while doing so, demonstrates a prejudicial bias that may be grounds for dismissal.
Name 2Many feel
stop opining.his focus
Of course it was.on an issue that was not part of the award
The reason for his filing was his obligation to respond to Team Grifty's petition.(which was the reason for his filing)
it is a CIVIL MATTER. The only reason NY criminal code is referenced is to distinguish penile from digital penetration.and going outside the applicable law while doing so,
He didn't have to "search" further than the DoJ definition....in explaining why the jury awarded 2 million.Kaplan apparently searched until he found a definition he liked more than the law he swore to uphold as a judge.
Because the award was for Digital Penetration. It was much greater than the awards normally associated with cases of Sexual Assault, exactly because the jury wasn't bound by NY criminal code in determining the amount of the award for damages.You will need to ask him why he chose to ignore NY law when it had no bearing on the amount of the award
"Dismissal" of what?demonstrates a prejudicial bias that may be grounds for dismissal.
When the trial occurred, digital penetration was defined by NY law as sexual assault. That is what the jury found Trump committed, NOT RAPE. If you have the courage to look at the actual jury verdict form, you will see the jury made an award for sexual assault. They DID NOT award a single dollar for rape...because they found Trump DID NOT COMMIT RAPE. NY criminal code is referenced because it is the law on which the jury was REQUIRED to use when determining a verdict. The DOJ definition of rape is completely irrelevant because, as you love to say, this was a NY civil trial. Besides, juries are never bound by any criminal code in determining an award in a civil trial. They could have awarded Carroll $1 billion if they wanted to. Of course, that award would have immediately been slashed. Lastly, Kaplan...in his filing...was NOT ruling on the accusations made against Trump. His opinion does NOT change the jury verdict. In his filing, he could only change the award amount and make it lower...he could not increase it.Blackvegetable » 22 Dec 2024, 8:44 pm » wrote: ↑
The award was calibrated to the alleged offense, specifically Digital Penetration.
The reason for his filing was his obligation to respond to Team Grifty's petition.
it is a CIVIL MATTER. The only reason NY criminal code is referenced is to distinguish penile from digital penetration.
He didn't have to "search" further than the DoJ definition....in explaining why the jury awarded 2 million.
Because the award was for Digital Penetration. It was much greater than the awards normally associated with cases of Sexual Assault, exactly because the jury wasn't bound by NY criminal code in determining the amount of the award for damages.
"Dismissal" of what?
He did - but without judicial immunity.
Show me.Cannonpointer » 22 Dec 2024, 8:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes. that is PRECISELY what the little greek did - and then he coughed up a million dollars.
I posted George's words, and I've posted the judge's words.Cannonpointer » 22 Dec 2024, 11:46 pm » wrote: ↑ He did - but without judicial immunity.
I know that your piss poor education did not qualify you to understand this, but you are making the claim that he said something other than what the judge said. It is on YOU to show the board the distinction you CLAIM exists.
you could've posted it a thousand times...it'll never penetrate brown's thick, ultradense skull...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom FIFY...Cannonpointer » 22 Dec 2024, 8:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes. that is PRECISELY what the little greek did - and then he coughed up 15 million dollars.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom brown, bring that up to ABC's legal team...you can get their monies back...you'll be the hero of the day as the only person in the whole wide world that "knew"...Blackvegetable » 23 Dec 2024, 6:27 am » wrote: ↑ I posted George's words, and I've posted the judge's words.
You've humiliated the rest of your litter.

JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom JuCo,ROG62 » 23 Dec 2024, 7:07 am » wrote: ↑ brown, bring that up to ABC's legal team...you can get their monies back...you'll be the hero of the day as the only person in the whole wide world that "knew"...
*Beekeeper » 23 Dec 2024, 7:20 am » wrote: ↑ You're so **** STUPID!!
The point is, YOU need to call and give them the GOOD NEWS you claim will SAVE KAPLAN from having this ENTIRE CASE DISMISSED!!
That **** "education" you claim you have sucks massively.
on what grounds, BGroomer?will SAVE KAPLAN from having this ENTIRE CASE DISMISSED!!
The word Rape in Kaplan's filing is in quotation marks.ConsRule » 22 Dec 2024, 9:37 pm » wrote: ↑ When the trial occurred, digital penetration was defined by NY law as sexual assault. That is what the jury found Trump committed, NOT RAPE. If you have the courage to look at the actual jury verdict form, you will see the jury made an award for sexual assault. They DID NOT award a single dollar for rape...because they found Trump DID NOT COMMIT RAPE. NY criminal code is referenced because it is the law on which the jury was REQUIRED to use when determining a verdict. The DOJ definition of rape is completely irrelevant because, as you love to say, this was a NY civil trial. Besides, juries are never bound by any criminal code in determining an award in a civil trial. They could have awarded Carroll $1 billion if they wanted to. Of course, that award would have immediately been slashed. Lastly, Kaplan...in his filing...was NOT ruling on the accusations made against Trump. His opinion does NOT change the jury verdict. In his filing, he could only change the award amount and make it lower...he could not increase it.
We all know you and far too stupid to ever understand those facts. You are free to do as everyone in the FAW community...live in your fantasy world.
Here, ASSHOLE.Blackvegetable » 23 Dec 2024, 6:27 am » wrote: ↑I posted George's words, and I've posted the judge's words.Cannonpointer » 22 Dec 2024, 11:46 pm » wrote: ↑ He did - but without judicial immunity.
I know that your piss poor education did not qualify you to understand this, but you are making the claim that he said something other than what the judge said. It is on YOU to show the board the distinction you CLAIM exists.
You've humiliated the rest of your litter.
@*VegasVagina*Beekeeper » 23 Dec 2024, 7:31 am » wrote: ↑ Here, ASSHOLE.
Let YOUR OWN WORDS be refreshed for you to see!!
Sucks how **** MORONIC you are and have no problem in DODGING WHAT YOU SAID IN PLAIN PRINT!!
Nice try, ***. No questions.
Well yes you did, pookie - in some other thread, on some other day.Blackvegetable » 23 Dec 2024, 6:27 am » wrote: ↑ I posted George's words, and I've posted the judge's words.
You've humiliated the rest of your litter.
abc paid the 15 - the greek coughed a mil of his OWN money.