YOU Tube only conveys the images and words that PROVE what what is TRUE, and what is NOT... YOU HOWEVER? YOU post YOUR BULL $HIT , without ANY supporting FACTS, DATA, or EVIDENCE... and just EXPECT (i.e. HOPE) that people BELIEVE it?Squatchman » 23 Dec 2024, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑ Oh boy!
YouTube news!
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Cutting edge **** right there.
Looks like we can't compel your proper use of the English Language.Squatchman » 25 Dec 2024, 6:35 am » wrote: ↑ They can compell Hunter to appear.
They can't compell him.to testify.
Squatchman » 25 Dec 2024, 6:35 am » wrote: ↑ They can compell Hunter to appear.
They can't compell him.to testify.
He'll just smirk at their flailing.
You think hunter got his daughter in Arkansas anything for Christmas?Squatchman » 25 Dec 2024, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑ He'll just smirk at their flailing.
It should be fun to watch.
**** you lying *** traitor.Squatchman » 23 Dec 2024, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑ Oh boy!
YouTube news!
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Cutting edge **** right there.
Squatchman » 25 Dec 2024, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑ He'll just smirk at their flailing.
It should be fun to watch.
YES... THEY CAN COMPEL him to answer questions... Normally, if he HAD NOT been given immunity, he could use the 5th amendment protection... BUT with the pardon, THAT is no longer an option... He can NO LONGER say: "I refuse to answer on the grounds that I may INCRIMINATE myself".. and get away scott free !!Squatchman » 25 Dec 2024, 6:35 am » wrote: ↑ They can compell Hunter to appear.
They can't compell him.to testify.
ConservativeWave » 25 Dec 2024, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑ YES... THEY CAN COMPEL him to answer questions... Normally, if he HAD NOT been given immunity, he could use the 5th amendment protection... BUT with the pardon, THAT is no longer an option... He can NO LONGER say: "I refuse to answer on the grounds that I may INCRIMINATE myself".. ad get away scott free !!
So, he can no longer plead the 5th... he needs to either answer TRUTHFULLY, or LIE...
1) If he answers truthfully, his testimony can be used as evidence to indict OTHERS,
2) If he LIES, and it can be proven, he CAN (i.e. WILL) be indicted for PERJURY !!
3) If he REFUSES to answer questions, he CAN (i.e. WILL) be indicted for Obstruction of Justice !!
As I understand it... THOSE are his ONLY 3 options !!
jerrab » 25 Dec 2024, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑ then they can ask questions of all the ones trump pardoned.
Donald Trump granted FEWER pardons than ANY other president in HISTORY... except for George W. Bush, and George HW Bush...jerrab » 25 Dec 2024, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑ then they can ask questions of all the ones trump pardoned.
---------------------------------------ConservativeWave » 25 Dec 2024, 5:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Donald Trump granted FEWER pardons than ANY other president in HISTORY... except for George W. Bush, and George HW Bush...
https://www.newsweek.com/list-who-donal ... ed-1993998
AND, his highest politically charged pardons? WERE ALREADY convicted and were an OPEN book... and the Democrats KNEW it, because they were NEVER even questioned after their pardons !!Michael Flynn –Former National Security Adviser who pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI over contacts with a Russian official.
Roger Stone –Trump ally convicted of lying to Congress regarding his attempts to contact WikiLeaks after the website released damaging emails about Trump's 2016 election rival Hillary Clinton.
Paul Manafort – Former Trump campaign chairman convicted of financial fraud, alleged Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. election and conspiring to obstruct the investigation.
Charles Kushner – Father of Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner, convicted of tax evasion and witness tampering, and recently nominated by Trump as the U.S.'s ambassador to France.
I think YOU got a BIG FAT NOTHING burger there... BUT, Democrats are used to that against Trump !!!
Honesty isn't cutting edge to corrupted souls staying on message as ancestrally practiced to date since dawn of civilization within this species pretending life exceeds adapting in the moment here 24/7.Squatchman » 23 Dec 2024, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑ Oh boy!
YouTube news!
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Cutting edge **** right there.
Can you get all of that on a head stone?Skans » 26 Dec 2024, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Joe Biden. Stupid. Corrupt. Liar. Extortionist. Weak. Money Launderer. Pedophile. Classified Document Thief. Plagiarist. Demented.
Barack Obama "Never underestimate Joe's ability to royally **** things up."
You laugh at You TubeSquatchman » 23 Dec 2024, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑ Oh boy!
YouTube news!
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Cutting edge **** right there.
It's Democrat logic... WHEN you GOT NOTHING... you ATTACK the Grammar, and/or IMPUGN the source !HarperLee » 27 Dec 2024, 7:01 am » wrote: ↑ You laugh at You Tube
6 months ago when asked where you read Babbitt was on meth you said Facebook.
Yeah ..
That's where you got your education