Line up another company to contract with that doesn't use union employees...then fire the current company. I would be shocked it this doesn't violate a clause in their contract.Squatchman » 23 Dec 2024, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑ They're driving trucks and vans with the Amazon name on them aren't they?
Close enough.
And their timing is perfect.
Ever hear of right to work states? Any company at risk of having a union sniffing around knows it's coming. I see a layoff coming. Much cheaper to have your tax rate go up than deal with union employees.*GHETTOBLASTER » 23 Dec 2024, 9:03 pm » wrote: ↑
Demonstrating to the powerless sheep [the non union full time employees] how to improve your working conditions...
Biden drives trucks that saySquatchman » 23 Dec 2024, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑ They're driving trucks and vans with the Amazon name on them aren't they?
Close enough.
And their timing is perfect.
It looks like that strategy to insulate themselves failed.PhiloBeddo » 23 Dec 2024, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑ Non of these workers on strike work for Amazon. They are hired contractors to deliver packages. The people on strike don't get a paycheck from Amazon.
It looks a lot like you can. Pretty sure they're doing it.PhiloBeddo » 23 Dec 2024, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑ You cannot strike a company because you don't like the pay another company pays their employees.
So Amazon is making a lot of money, ya say?PhiloBeddo » 23 Dec 2024, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑Teamsters are just going after the deep pockets of Amazon.
Those are opinions, and you're entitled to them. But I don't think you've made any case with this OP. You've just expressed opinions - some of which are demonstrably incorrect.PhiloBeddo » 23 Dec 2024, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑ Teamsters are completely wrong. I bet a lot of these strikers are paid professional strikers.
The ones that come to my house are.Squatchman » 23 Dec 2024, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑ They're driving trucks and vans with the Amazon name on them aren't they?
Seems so.
Flawless plan - you should be the Amazon CEO.ConsRule » 23 Dec 2024, 9:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Line up another company to contract with that doesn't use union employees...then fire the current company. I would be shocked it this doesn't violate a clause in their contract.