Liberal Forum

Hope you stupid Dems are happy killing people with your racist ****. 

PhiloBeddo » 09 Jan 2025, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jan 2025, 1:04 pm

Hope you stupid Dems are happy killing people with your racist ****.

Do you have some sort of link on this?

We got a DEI president elect.
Old. Check
Fat. Check
Stupid. Check
Orange. Check

DEI is dead

Vids of fatass lezzies trying to put out these fires is **** hilarious.

Squatchman » 09 Jan 2025, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jan 2025, 1:30 pm

We got a DEI president elect.
Old. Check
Fat. Check
Stupid. Check
Orange. Check

LOl, these little pussified bitches absolutely cannot stop lying or talking about trump. I bet you jack off to videos of trump.

Sumela » 09 Jan 2025, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jan 2025, 2:03 pm

Vids of fatass lezzies trying to put out these fires is **** hilarious.

No such thing you lying **** stain.

murdock » 09 Jan 2025, 4:07 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jan 2025, 4:07 pm

No such thing you lying **** stain.

said the rainbow boi  
 

Sumela » 09 Jan 2025, 4:17 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jan 2025, 4:17 pm

said the rainbow boi

Still praying your lying *** lying *** gets hit by a car and destroyed.
 

If the surgeon had the required degree and experience then so be it.

impartialobserver » 09 Jan 2025, 4:43 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jan 2025, 4:43 pm

If the surgeon had the required degree and experience then so be it.

What if the standards were lowered to make it easier for certain people. 
 

PhiloBeddo » 09 Jan 2025, 4:45 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jan 2025, 4:45 pm

What if the standards were lowered to make it easier for certain people.

Then i would not be so calm. I know someone who works for the University of Utah medical school and at least there, there has been no relaxing of standards. If anything at U of U, it has became even more competitive. 

impartialobserver » 09 Jan 2025, 4:43 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jan 2025, 4:43 pm

If the surgeon had the required degree and experience then so be it.

I don't think in the medical field we have to worry about DEI and doctors.  But when talking about jobs like fireman there is no room for DEI.  You either can pass the physical requirements or you can't.  If you can't, find another profession.

Same as when I was in the Army.  There was a standard for women and standard for men.  The women's standard was lower.  But my opinion was if a woman could pass the men's standards then let her be a combat arms troop if she so chooses.

I was also in aviation as a crew member.  Flying is more of a hand eye co-ordination thing and for helicopters add in the feet.  I flew within who were outstanding, avg and **** pilots.  I flew with a small sample of women when I was in non combat units.  Same thing.  Some were avg, some outstanding, and some sucked.   

Anyone with avg hand eye skills can learn to fly.  What separates the good from the bad is the ability to make decisions in a high stress situation.


There are certain professions where we must not allow watered down standards.

https://youtu.be/CnxFHVrcivw?si=Z879rkxE6ivJwuM2
 

*Huey » 09 Jan 2025, 4:51 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jan 2025, 4:51 pm

I don't think in the medical field we have to worry about DEI and doctors.  But when talking about jobs like fireman there is no room for DEI.  You either can pass the physical requirements or you can't.  If you can't, find another profession.

Same as when I was in the Army.  There was a standard for women and standard for men.  The women's standard was lower.  But my opinion was if a woman could pass the men's standards then let her be a combat arms troop if she so chooses.

I was also in aviation as a crew member.  Flying is more of a hand eye co-ordination thing and for helicopters add in the feet.  I flew within who were outstanding, avg and **** pilots.  I flew with a small sample of women when I was in non combat units.  Same thing.  Some were avg, some outstanding, and some sucked.   

Anyone with avg hand eye skills can learn to fly.  What separates the good from the bad is the ability to make decisions in a high stress situation.

There are certain professions where we must not allow watered down standards.

I agree with what you wrote. Where it gets mucked up is the assumption by folks like the OP that any non-white who works in a given profession is a DEI hire. Also, just because an employer (public or private) has DEI embedded in their operation, that does not effectively exclude whites. Lastly, even if it is a DEI hire in xyz profession... as long as it is the private sector, they are free to hire whoever they want and then sink/swim based on that. When I was with the state of Nevada.. there was no official DEI policy but in the past 3 years the nonwhites outnumbered the whites. As to why.. lower wages. 

impartialobserver » 09 Jan 2025, 4:58 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jan 2025, 4:58 pm

I agree with what you wrote. Where it gets mucked up is the assumption by folks like the OP that any non-white who works in a given profession is a DEI hire. Also, just because an employer (public or private) has DEI embedded in their operation, that does not effectively exclude whites. Lastly, even if it is a DEI hire in xyz profession... as long as it is the private sector, they are free to hire whoever they want and then sink/swim based on that. When I was with the state of Nevada.. there was no official DEI policy but in the past 3 years the nonwhites outnumbered the whites. As to why.. lower wages.

All I want to hear from politicians is they are going to appoint or choose the best qualified.

In the military there weren't many black pilots or crew members or females when I served.  As far as blacks, when I served, many minorities went into non combat fields to learn a skill that would transfer to the civilian world.  Clerks, finance types, cooks, whatever.  They would make a career of it.  Many of the middle class whites were in for education benefits and would join combat arms for the adventure.

Keep in mind I joined the post draft military.  1983 was in thru the 90s.  

I think DEI is done though.  What screwed Biden, and Harris, is when he said he was looking at females, black females, for VP.  He should have kept his mouth shut and said he was looking for the most qualified.

*Huey » 09 Jan 2025, 5:07 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jan 2025, 5:07 pm

I think DEI is done though.  What screwed Biden, and Harris, is when he said he was looking at females, black females, for VP.  He should have kept his mouth shut and said he was looking for the most qualified.

Maybe in the public sector. However, in other sectors it is going to continue in pockets. Especially in industries where style means more than substance. The younger generation cares about this. If you give off the impression as being inclusive/diverse, you will see increased revenues from that demographic. 

PhiloBeddo » 09 Jan 2025, 4:45 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jan 2025, 4:45 pm

What if the standards were lowered to make it easier for certain people.

Do you really believe the DEI hires apply to heart surgeons or pilots ?

factory, foundry, manufacturing, warehouse, construction, landscaping …. Sure

Your OP is stupid 

PhiloBeddo » 09 Jan 2025, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jan 2025, 1:04 pm

Hope you stupid Dems are happy killing people with your racist ****.

Well, at least the FAA and AMA have requirements where DEI wouldn't make it unless they passed all required schooling...

Squatchman » 09 Jan 2025, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jan 2025, 1:30 pm

We got a DEI president elect.
Old. Check
Fat. Check
Stupid. Check
Orange. Check

sorry squatboi, kamalatoe lost...