Women have a right to be believed - Hitlery Klingon.Sumela » 11 Jan 2025, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Another empire has fallen into decadence.
All while denying that this is true.
BOOM!Cannonpointer » 10 Jan 2025, 11:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Leave aside the doing of such a thing. The SAYING of such a thing fists the throat of the EU and the throats of every country in it. It's a complete unmasking - the Great Reveal. It doesn't just technically violate the vaunted "rules based order." It shreds it, **** on it, wipes with it, and rubs it in the faces of the people we tasked with enforcing it.
Europe would quite literally have to choose between going to war with us, or just laying down and whimpering abjectly while the "rules based order" rides off into the sunset aboard their white horse and silver saddle. And here's the thing: They CAN'T go to war with us. They're more cucked than we are.
They could side with Russia, I suppose.
Cannonpointer » 11 Jan 2025, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Do Trump's words tend to comport with, or tend to challenge, the rules based order and international law and our mutual defense treaties with Danmark?
Would seizing Greenland militarily trigger NATO's Article 5, essentially ENDING NATO?
Even the 2 empire **** that run the EU?Cannonpointer » 11 Jan 2025, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Women have a right to be believed - Hitlery Klingon.

When the Count cannot access preferred victims, he turns to Renfield.Sumela » 11 Jan 2025, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑ BOOM!![]()
The Empire is a Panicked Vampire. Now eating its own in order to survive.
Germany is being picked clean. The Uke war has gutted the EU economy,
again, it is for the US Empire. And 90% of their leaders are in on the grift.
Bernard spoke of these events yesterday.
MoA - Looting The 'Allies'
I disagree with your link. The empire was confident that it could destroy Russia economically, remove Putin through a color revolution, and loot Russia. The EU nations would have gotten fed. Not prime cuts - but fed.Sumela » 11 Jan 2025, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑ BOOM!![]()
The Empire is a Panicked Vampire. Now eating its own in order to survive.
Germany is being picked clean. The Uke war has gutted the EU economy,
again, it is for the US Empire. And 90% of their leaders are in on the grift.
Bernard spoke of these events yesterday.
MoA - Looting The 'Allies'
Damn, well played.Cannonpointer » 11 Jan 2025, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑ When the Count cannot access preferred victims, he turns to Renfield.
ESPECIALLY those two ****.
I do.
Well no ****, He's threatening military action - they might want to chat him up a bit, eh?*Huey » 11 Jan 2025, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑But I do know the leaders of both Greenland and Denmark want to meet with Trump
Oh, no question this is plan B.Cannonpointer » 11 Jan 2025, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑ I disagree with your link. The empire was confident that it could destroy Russia economically, remove Putin through a color revolution, and loot Russia. The EU nations would have gotten fed. Not prime cuts - but fed.
The gambit failed. Plan B - loot the E.U.
Your source treats it like this was Plan A. I do not believe that it was. We're not eating the E.U.'s leg because it is what we hunted. We're eating it because it is what we had to settle for.
In the end, the empire is using the Cool Hand Luke line, "That's the way Putin wants it. Well, he gets it. And I don't like it any more than you men do."
This is what I cannot see.Sumela » 11 Jan 2025, 12:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh, no question this is plan B.
I would add to your Plan A that the looting Russia was secondary to weakening China.
A step stool to the real prize....wrangling and controlling China.
Either way, what Supreme Neocon Brezinsky feared most and stated decades ago...has happened in spades.Cannonpointer » 11 Jan 2025, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑ This is what I cannot see.
Bringing Russia into NATO would have FAR exceeded destroying Russia, in terms of weakening China. In my view, destroying a peer competitor on China's border is a FAVOR to China's ambitions.
I see Plan A as a blunder and Plan B as suicide by vassalectomy.
Cannonpointer » 11 Jan 2025, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑ I do.
I suspect if Biden said that ****, you would.
Well no ****, He's threatening military action - they might want to chat him up a bit, eh?
well duhhh...*Huey » 11 Jan 2025, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑ I would have the same attitude if Biden said it as I do now.
Ya mean this?*Huey » 11 Jan 2025, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑ I would have the same attitude if Biden said it as I do now.
Cannonpointer » 11 Jan 2025, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑ The issue BEHIND the myriad issues is this: How do Trump's threats regarding Greenland comport with the vaunted "Rules-Based Order" that the west has been enforcing, quite moralistically, since WWII? And where does this leave the E.U., in terms of their relationship to a bandit nation whose leader threatens the very rules based order it has been in charge of defending?
We have manipulated them out of their cheap Russian gas. We could never compete with Russia on price, so we had to knock Russia out of the game and seize their market through banditry, using Eunuchraine as a proxy and the E.U. leaders as bribed stooges. As a result, major cracks are showing in the E.U., with Orban of Hungary and Fico of Slovakia in open rebellion, threatening to sanction Eunuchraine for doing the U.S. bidding by shutting down the gas transit from Russia.
And now we have the spectacle of Trump talking like a crazed third world despot, threatening an E.U. MEMBER, for **** sake. AN E.U. MEMBER STATE!!!
It's just so far out of the box that I don't know what to do except roll on the floor laughing my *** off. I knew the empire was coming unglued, but it looks like our crash and burn might be accompanied by some fine fiddle-work.
Donnie rosin up that bow and play that fiddle hard,
The rules based order's over and the biggest ape runs the yard,
The competition's on the curb, we're sellin' Europe gas,
We're takin' what the **** we want, let the E.U. kiss our ***...
Now Trump said my name's murca, and it might be a sin,
But the rules based order is gettin' old and we're puttin' it in the bin!
Fire in the polar region run boys run
Devil's in the house of the settin' sun.
Does E.U.'s dog bite, no, child, no!
Takin' over Greenland go boys go...
Cannonpointer » 11 Jan 2025, 12:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Ya mean this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HblPucwN-m0
what next? france for it's vineyards? some country for saffron? talk about entitlement personality.impartialobserver » 09 Jan 2025, 4:49 pm » wrote: ↑ They want Greenland for the rare earth minerals and oil that could be extracted. I would oppose a military takeover. They want to be fully independent.. not an autonomous region of Denmark. Can't see why they should not be allowed to be on their own.
Some people can't define a woman....oops.
I knew a stripper name Saffron, she was worth the insurgency, so to speak.jerrab » 11 Jan 2025, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑ what next? france for it's vineyards? some country for saffron? talk about entitlement personality.