Liberal Forum

Here's how I can prove AI should be renamed AMS - Artificially Manipulated Stupidity.  I asked Chat GPT how many genders there are.  It replied

"The concept of gender is complex and can vary across cultures, societies, and individual experiences. Traditionally, many societies have recognized only two genders, male and female, often based on biological sex. However, in contemporary discussions, especially within fields like sociology, psychology, and gender studies, gender is understood as a spectrum that includes a variety of identities beyond just male and female. "

What a F-tard answer.  Manipulated by woke cock-suckers for sure. It conclusively proves this IS NOT anything remotely close to non-human intelligence writing this ****.

So, who exactly owns and controls Chat GPT?  Lots of layers of **** to figure this out.  Let's see how far I can get.....

• OpenAI owns Chat GPT
• OpenAI is Governed by OpenAI, Inc. (non-profit parent) and OpenAI, LP (for profit subsidiary)
• OpenAI, Inc. Board of Directors
  • Sam Altman, CEO and co-founder
  • Greg Brockman, president and co-founder
  • Ilya Sutskever, co-founder and chief-scientist
  • Reid Hoffman - LinkedIn co-founder; In 2019, Hoffman had hosted dinner attended by Jeffrey Epstein along with Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg. September 2014, Hoffman visited Epstein's private island for a weekend.
  • Bill Gates - because Microsoft gave crap-tons of money to this venture
  • Tasha McCauley
• OpenAI, LP
  •  General Partner is OpenAI, Inc.
  • Limited Partners are primarily Microsoft
  • Other limited partners identities are kept on the "down-low".  But, they include
    • Reid Hoffman Foundation (Hoffman is the founder of LinkedIn, On the board of PayPal and part of founders),
    • Khosla Ventures - founded by Vinod Khosla

Doing a deeper dive into the Reid Hoffman Foundation and Khosla Ventures is more difficult.  I'm sure Hoffman runs his foundation; I don't know who's asses Khosla has his nose in. 

Skans » Yesterday, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:51 am

Here's how I can prove AI should be renamed AMS - Artificially Manipulated Stupidity.  I asked Chat GPT how many genders there are.  It replied

"The concept of gender is complex and can vary across cultures, societies, and individual experiences. Traditionally, many societies have recognized only two genders, male and female, often based on biological sex. However, in contemporary discussions, especially within fields like sociology, psychology, and gender studies, gender is understood as a spectrum that includes a variety of identities beyond just male and female. "

What a F-tard answer.  Manipulated by woke cock-suckers for sure. It conclusively proves this IS NOT anything remotely close to non-human intelligence writing this ****.

So, who exactly owns and controls Chat GPT?  Lots of layers of **** to figure this out.  Let's see how far I can get.....

• OpenAI owns Chat GPT
• OpenAI is Governed by OpenAI, Inc. (non-profit parent) and OpenAI, LP (for profit subsidiary)
• OpenAI, Inc. Board of Directors
  • Sam Altman, CEO and co-founder
  • Greg Brockman, president and co-founder
  • Ilya Sutskever, co-founder and chief-scientist
  • Reid Hoffman - LinkedIn co-founder; In 2019, Hoffman had hosted dinner attended by Jeffrey Epstein along with Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg. September 2014, Hoffman visited Epstein's private island for a weekend.
  • Bill Gates - because Microsoft gave crap-tons of money to this venture
  • Tasha McCauley
• OpenAI, LP
  •  General Partner is OpenAI, Inc.
  • Limited Partners are primarily Microsoft
  • Other limited partners identities are kept on the "down-low".  But, they include
    • Reid Hoffman Foundation (Hoffman is the founder of LinkedIn, On the board of PayPal and part of founders),
    • Khosla Ventures - founded by Vinod Khosla

Doing a deeper dive into the Reid Hoffman Foundation and Khosla Ventures is more difficult.  I'm sure Hoffman runs his foundation; I don't know who's asses Khosla has his nose in.

There are more conspiratorial reasons to worry about AI, but there's a more cynical one:

Namely, investors have nowhere left to put their money (thanks to the trillions printed in the aftermath of the Great Financial Crisis and Covid). So they need to invent a "narrative" to get investors to pour their money into dead end money sinks...in other words, AI.

It's mostly a ton of BS and once the bubble implodes...well, let's just say you don't want to be in ANY stocks except inverse ETFs like SQQQ or SOXS. 

But until then, enjoy the ride. It's a gravy train that will eventually fall off a bridge.

Skans » Yesterday, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:51 am

Here's how I can prove AI should be renamed AMS - Artificially Manipulated Stupidity.  I asked Chat GPT how many genders there are.  It replied

"The concept of gender is complex and can vary across cultures, societies, and individual experiences. Traditionally, many societies have recognized only two genders, male and female, often based on biological sex. However, in contemporary discussions, especially within fields like sociology, psychology, and gender studies, gender is understood as a spectrum that includes a variety of identities beyond just male and female. "

What a F-tard answer.  Manipulated by woke cock-suckers for sure. It conclusively proves this IS NOT anything remotely close to non-human intelligence writing this ****.

So, who exactly owns and controls Chat GPT?  Lots of layers of **** to figure this out.  Let's see how far I can get.....

• OpenAI owns Chat GPT
• OpenAI is Governed by OpenAI, Inc. (non-profit parent) and OpenAI, LP (for profit subsidiary)
• OpenAI, Inc. Board of Directors
  • Sam Altman, CEO and co-founder
  • Greg Brockman, president and co-founder
  • Ilya Sutskever, co-founder and chief-scientist
  • Reid Hoffman - LinkedIn co-founder; In 2019, Hoffman had hosted dinner attended by Jeffrey Epstein along with Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg. September 2014, Hoffman visited Epstein's private island for a weekend.
  • Bill Gates - because Microsoft gave crap-tons of money to this venture
  • Tasha McCauley
• OpenAI, LP
  •  General Partner is OpenAI, Inc.
  • Limited Partners are primarily Microsoft
  • Other limited partners identities are kept on the "down-low".  But, they include
    • Reid Hoffman Foundation (Hoffman is the founder of LinkedIn, On the board of PayPal and part of founders),
    • Khosla Ventures - founded by Vinod Khosla

Doing a deeper dive into the Reid Hoffman Foundation and Khosla Ventures is more difficult.  I'm sure Hoffman runs his foundation; I don't know who's asses Khosla has his nose in.

Maybe you should listen to @FOS ?

(<[ Sam Altman ]>) ... hmm, oh right he's a Tribe member. LOL!!! 

Skans » Yesterday, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:51 am

Here's how I can prove AI should be renamed AMS - Artificially Manipulated Stupidity.  I asked Chat GPT how many genders there are.  It replied

"The concept of gender is complex and can vary across cultures, societies, and individual experiences. Traditionally, many societies have recognized only two genders, male and female, often based on biological sex. However, in contemporary discussions, especially within fields like sociology, psychology, and gender studies, gender is understood as a spectrum that includes a variety of identities beyond just male and female. "

What a F-tard answer.  Manipulated by woke cock-suckers for sure. It conclusively proves this IS NOT anything remotely close to non-human intelligence writing this ****.

So, who exactly owns and controls Chat GPT?  Lots of layers of **** to figure this out.  Let's see how far I can get.....

• OpenAI owns Chat GPT
• OpenAI is Governed by OpenAI, Inc. (non-profit parent) and OpenAI, LP (for profit subsidiary)
• OpenAI, Inc. Board of Directors
  • Sam Altman, CEO and co-founder
  • Greg Brockman, president and co-founder
  • Ilya Sutskever, co-founder and chief-scientist
  • Reid Hoffman - LinkedIn co-founder; In 2019, Hoffman had hosted dinner attended by Jeffrey Epstein along with Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg. September 2014, Hoffman visited Epstein's private island for a weekend.
  • Bill Gates - because Microsoft gave crap-tons of money to this venture
  • Tasha McCauley
• OpenAI, LP
  •  General Partner is OpenAI, Inc.
  • Limited Partners are primarily Microsoft
  • Other limited partners identities are kept on the "down-low".  But, they include
    • Reid Hoffman Foundation (Hoffman is the founder of LinkedIn, On the board of PayPal and part of founders),
    • Khosla Ventures - founded by Vinod Khosla

Doing a deeper dive into the Reid Hoffman Foundation and Khosla Ventures is more difficult.  I'm sure Hoffman runs his foundation; I don't know who's asses Khosla has his nose in. 

everyone says I speak gibberish and I am stupid thinking I understand how reality governs ancestors 24/7. Factual reality governs each person's Estimated Time Alive when occupying space cradle to grave.

How is that measured contextually, intellectually, ancestrally so far since dawn of civilization and the invention of longitude and latitude measurements of the surface of this planet each rotation forward now.

Why does each ancestor get a specific time living in a specific generation gap present since inception of the DNA genetic arrival of mixing chromosomes of the past to perpetuate the current population by the numbers in the atmosphere here now as a whole food chain in series parallel positions currently staging humanity's outcomes tomorrow midnight to noon punishing anyone not complying to power of suggestion noon to midnight same rotation?

Living doesn't exceed being alive now. Never has but humanity governs like it isn't possible genetics eternally separates each sole ancestor displaced ancestrally here, today.

Reasonable doubt only lasts when personal brains chant a social mantra until extinction arrives.

What is the cause of extinction event? no more great great grandchildren added again.

LowIQTrash » Today, 3:12 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:12 am

Maybe you should listen to @FOS ?

(<[ Sam Altman ]> ... hmm, oh right he's a Tribe member. LOL!!!

Yes, by all means listen to 'Lil Hitler......he can give you the final solution to all your problems...."It's da Joos"  

RebelGator » 35 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

35 minutes ago

Yes, by all means listen to 'Lil Hitler......he can give you the final solution to all your problems...."It's da Joos"

I'm just surprised noIQ didn't even bring up the joo card...will wonders ever cease...
 

Skans » Yesterday, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:51 am

Here's how I can prove AI should be renamed AMS - Artificially Manipulated Stupidity.  I asked Chat GPT how many genders there are.  It replied

"The concept of gender is complex and can vary across cultures, societies, and individual experiences. Traditionally, many societies have recognized only two genders, male and female, often based on biological sex. However, in contemporary discussions, especially within fields like sociology, psychology, and gender studies, gender is understood as a spectrum that includes a variety of identities beyond just male and female. "

What a F-tard answer.  Manipulated by woke cock-suckers for sure. It conclusively proves this IS NOT anything remotely close to non-human intelligence writing this ****.

So, who exactly owns and controls Chat GPT?  Lots of layers of **** to figure this out.  Let's see how far I can get.....

• OpenAI owns Chat GPT
• OpenAI is Governed by OpenAI, Inc. (non-profit parent) and OpenAI, LP (for profit subsidiary)
• OpenAI, Inc. Board of Directors
  • Sam Altman, CEO and co-founder
  • Greg Brockman, president and co-founder
  • Ilya Sutskever, co-founder and chief-scientist
  • Reid Hoffman - LinkedIn co-founder; In 2019, Hoffman had hosted dinner attended by Jeffrey Epstein along with Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg. September 2014, Hoffman visited Epstein's private island for a weekend.
  • Bill Gates - because Microsoft gave crap-tons of money to this venture
  • Tasha McCauley
• OpenAI, LP
  •  General Partner is OpenAI, Inc.
  • Limited Partners are primarily Microsoft
  • Other limited partners identities are kept on the "down-low".  But, they include
    • Reid Hoffman Foundation (Hoffman is the founder of LinkedIn, On the board of PayPal and part of founders),
    • Khosla Ventures - founded by Vinod Khosla

Doing a deeper dive into the Reid Hoffman Foundation and Khosla Ventures is more difficult.  I'm sure Hoffman runs his foundation; I don't know whose asses Khosla has his nose in.

proof it's only as good as the information put into it...until it becomes an organic self replicating independent entity...*

*author GASPS after reading and apologizes for any similarities to posts written by 31st arrival...please show mercy as his secretary has disavowed any knowledge of his actions...
 

31stArrival » Today, 5:50 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:50 am

everyone says I speak gibberish and I am stupid 
 

They are right. You spew more **** than a nut house. Choke babblestain.

LowIQTrash » Today, 3:07 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:07 am

There are more conspiratorial reasons to worry about AI, but here is my cynical take:

------------------------------------------

Namely, investors have nowhere left to put their money (thanks to the trillions printed in the aftermath of the Great Financial Crisis and Covid). Even local car washes that are relatively hands-off ("semi-passive" sources of income) are valued at historically high multiples to cash flow.

So "they" need to invent a "narrative" to get investors to pour their money into dead end money sinks...in other words, AI.

Same with "quantum computing" which is also ****.

It's mostly a ton of BS and once the bubble implodes...well, let's just say you don't want to be in ANY stocks except inverse ETFs like SQQQ or SOXS. I myself will be SHORTING the stock market to create generational wealth, assuming my brokerage doesn't implode as well. 

But until then, enjoy the ride. It's a gravy train that will eventually fall off a bridge.

Your perspective is interesting.  I, myself, do not really know where the AI boom will end up. I do recall saying this in the early '90's "The internet is the CB radio of the 1990's".  I had a similar sentiment pertaining to the internet as you do with AI.  Clearly, I couldn't have been more wrong.  Instead, I should have said "The Internet will make TV will go the way of the CB radio".  Hindsight  .

What I do know is this.  No matter what the future of AI is, Nvidia will be selling its chips and its platform at least until the end of this decade. So, I'm long on Nvidia - not a stock I would choose to short. As for all the others, especially with anything with a P/E well over 50 - who knows, you may be right.
 
 
 

The ability to think, adapt, and survive are a human trait, artificial intelligence is just that, it parrots prior human input.....that's all it is, nothing more.

murdock » 21 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

21 minutes ago

They are right. You spew more **** than a nut house. Choke babblestain.

Your intellectual calendar of past results is 52 weeks of stacked cards wishing now isn't eternity 365, 365, 365, 366 days in a row pretending your body isn't living eternally separated today.

See I can agree with Skans on a talking point about AI being bullcrap, but everything existing outside that talking point humanity is fertilizing ancestral brains with dried cow patties.

31stArrival » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

Your intellectual calendar of past results is 52 weeks of stacked cards wishing now isn't eternity 365, 365, 365, 366 days in a row pretending your body isn't living eternally separated today.

See I can agree with Skans on a talking point about AI being bullcrap, but everything existing outside that talking point humanity is fertilizing ancestral brains with dried cow patties.

Choke you lousy bastard.

murdock » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Choke you lousy bastard.

You like playing devil's advocate threatening to send anyone's soul not complying to eternal hell. I just happen to understand how eternal separation works genetically here eternally separating every fertilized cell of anything reproductively alive now without a doubt.

The standard response from the "Bots" is to always start out with "The issue is very complex"......

A good question to ask is "Why do all you AI Bots sound like you are effeminately raised ****** Bitches...?

ROG62 » Today, 7:44 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:44 am

*author GASPS after reading and apologizes for any similarities to posts written by 31st arrival...please show mercy as his secretary has disavowed any knowledge of his actions...
 

HOW DARE YOU!

Skans » Today, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:39 am

Your perspective is interesting.  I, myself, do not really know where the AI boom will end up. I do recall saying this in the early '90's "The internet is the CB radio of the 1990's".  I had a similar sentiment pertaining to the internet as you do with AI.  Clearly, I couldn't have been more wrong.  Instead, I should have said "The Internet will make TV will go the way of the CB radio".  Hindsight  .

What I do know is this.  No matter what the future of AI is, Nvidia will be selling its chips and its platform at least until the end of this decade. So, I'm long on Nvidia - not a stock I would choose to short. As for all the others, especially with anything with a P/E well over 50 - who knows, you may be right.

I’ve thought about that perspective you mentioned; namely, skepticism surrounding AI echoes skepticism from the 90s regarding the final impact of the Internet.

The main differences are that the Internet slowly seeped into all facets of our lives, from the first iteration of Netscape Navigator to the pop up ads asking you to click their link to win $50K, and the fact society was not nearly as decayed as it is now with the rampant nihilism and lack of social cohesion. 

The Internet and social media in particular have turned people into dopamine seeking zombies looking for the next hit. Hardly anyone today can survive without Internet at their disposal. (“Survive” metaphorically)

If someone in power cut off access to AI, I doubt ANYTHING would change. Its impact is minimal, and I think if ChatGPT were to disappear not that many people would care. I heard it can write spaghetti code in software but that’s a specific business application. Limited in scope.


 

Skans » Today, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:39 am

Your perspective is interesting.  I, myself, do not really know where the AI boom will end up. I do recall saying this in the early '90's "The internet is the CB radio of the 1990's".  I had a similar sentiment pertaining to the internet as you do with AI.  Clearly, I couldn't have been more wrong.  Instead, I should have said "The Internet will make TV will go the way of the CB radio".  Hindsight  .

What I do know is this.  No matter what the future of AI is, Nvidia will be selling its chips and its platform at least until the end of this decade. So, I'm long on Nvidia - not a stock I would choose to short. As for all the others, especially with anything with a P/E well over 50 - who knows, you may be right.

Nvidia is definitely not a short now, but its inferiors like AMD are. There will come a time where the king itself will have topped out and I doubt it will take until 2030 to see it…you may even see a meaningful top in 2025.

Skans » Yesterday, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:51 am

Here's how I can prove AI should be renamed AMS - Artificially Manipulated Stupidity.  I asked Chat GPT how many genders there are.  It replied

"The concept of gender is complex and can vary across cultures, societies, and individual experiences. Traditionally, many societies have recognized only two genders, male and female, often based on biological sex. However, in contemporary discussions, especially within fields like sociology, psychology, and gender studies, gender is understood as a spectrum that includes a variety of identities beyond just male and female. "

What a F-tard answer.  Manipulated by woke cock-suckers for sure. It conclusively proves this IS NOT anything remotely close to non-human intelligence writing this ****.

So, who exactly owns and controls Chat GPT?  Lots of layers of **** to figure this out.  Let's see how far I can get.....

• OpenAI owns Chat GPT
• OpenAI is Governed by OpenAI, Inc. (non-profit parent) and OpenAI, LP (for profit subsidiary)
• OpenAI, Inc. Board of Directors
  • Sam Altman, CEO and co-founder
  • Greg Brockman, president and co-founder
  • Ilya Sutskever, co-founder and chief-scientist
  • Reid Hoffman - LinkedIn co-founder; In 2019, Hoffman had hosted dinner attended by Jeffrey Epstein along with Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg. September 2014, Hoffman visited Epstein's private island for a weekend.
  • Bill Gates - because Microsoft gave crap-tons of money to this venture
  • Tasha McCauley
• OpenAI, LP
  •  General Partner is OpenAI, Inc.
  • Limited Partners are primarily Microsoft
  • Other limited partners identities are kept on the "down-low".  But, they include
    • Reid Hoffman Foundation (Hoffman is the founder of LinkedIn, On the board of PayPal and part of founders),
    • Khosla Ventures - founded by Vinod Khosla

Doing a deeper dive into the Reid Hoffman Foundation and Khosla Ventures is more difficult.  I'm sure Hoffman runs his foundation; I don't know who's asses Khosla has his nose in.

Would Pedo-progs and "Pootin' Sniffers" fall under the "Artificial Intelligence" category? 

Their intelligence seems to be as artificial as if gets!

Skans » Yesterday, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:51 am

Here's how I can prove AI should be renamed AMS - Artificially Manipulated Stupidity.  I asked Chat GPT how many genders there are.  It replied

"The concept of gender is complex and can vary across cultures, societies, and individual experiences. Traditionally, many societies have recognized only two genders, male and female, often based on biological sex. However, in contemporary discussions, especially within fields like sociology, psychology, and gender studies, gender is understood as a spectrum that includes a variety of identities beyond just male and female. "

What a F-tard answer.  Manipulated by woke cock-suckers for sure. It conclusively proves this IS NOT anything remotely close to non-human intelligence writing this ****.

So, who exactly owns and controls Chat GPT?  Lots of layers of **** to figure this out.  Let's see how far I can get.....

• OpenAI owns Chat GPT
• OpenAI is Governed by OpenAI, Inc. (non-profit parent) and OpenAI, LP (for profit subsidiary)
• OpenAI, Inc. Board of Directors
  • Sam Altman, CEO and co-founder
  • Greg Brockman, president and co-founder
  • Ilya Sutskever, co-founder and chief-scientist
  • Reid Hoffman - LinkedIn co-founder; In 2019, Hoffman had hosted dinner attended by Jeffrey Epstein along with Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg. September 2014, Hoffman visited Epstein's private island for a weekend.
  • Bill Gates - because Microsoft gave crap-tons of money to this venture
  • Tasha McCauley
• OpenAI, LP
  •  General Partner is OpenAI, Inc.
  • Limited Partners are primarily Microsoft
  • Other limited partners identities are kept on the "down-low".  But, they include
    • Reid Hoffman Foundation (Hoffman is the founder of LinkedIn, On the board of PayPal and part of founders),
    • Khosla Ventures - founded by Vinod Khosla

Doing a deeper dive into the Reid Hoffman Foundation and Khosla Ventures is more difficult.  I'm sure Hoffman runs his foundation; I don't know who's asses Khosla has his nose in.

You were off to a decent start...

The response it gave to your query is correct...because the answer is "relatively simple" in AI terms.

Where AI gets into trouble is trying to make qualitative distinctions between inputs. Bad ones can easily corrupt output even in very small numbers.

You were even close with the question of ownership.....but on the wrong track.

it's a 501 c non profit.this is generating headaches because it now wants to establish a "for profit" arm...the debate is over how to value any such equity stake (the non profit would have to be compensated) and what constitutes "Control" as well as any premium which should be attached thereto.
 

LowIQTrash » 30 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

30 minutes ago

Nvidia is definitely not a short now, but its inferiors like AMD are. There will come a time where the king itself will have topped out and I doubt it will take until 2030 to see it…you may even see a meaningful top in 2025.

I disagree.  Nvidia's P/E is not high compared to its growth.  It is reasonably priced, perhaps even in value territory - again, based on its growth and existing demand for its products.

AMD's P/E is 105, which is not justified by any explosive growth or demand for its products.  Also, AMD has Qualcom and Intel (maybe) to compete with; not to mention Nvidia.  You're right, it may be a potential short play.  The bottom line, I never short the big tech darlings because I don't know what new 3-ring circus tricks they have ready to come on stage.