Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 16 Jan 2025, 11:37 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2025, 11:37 pm

The butt hurt is extreme in this one. 

eMOshunal DAMage.     

Hey Karen....

Like the way you Pootin' Sniffers use emoji's to make it look like your posts are funny. 

Takes all the effort out of having to display wit you might not possess doesn't it?

Oak Tree!      

Fertilizer!      

Light Bulb!      


Well Karen.....seems I just destroyed your ability to be perceived as witty and humorous doesn't it?


OOPS!

nefarious101 » 17 Jan 2025, 7:48 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 7:48 am

Hey Karen....

Like the way you Pootin' Sniffers use emoji's to make it look like your posts are funny. 

Takes all the effort out of having to display wit you might not possess doesn't it?

Oak Tree! :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:  

Fertilizer! :die:   :die:   :die:  

Light Bulb! :clap:   :rofl:   :die:  


Well Karen.....seems I just destroyed your ability to be perceived as witty and humorous doesn't it?


OOPS!

Actions and reactions are equal in natural time displaced. Opposite polarities are mirror results of both doing the same thing at the same time.

and look what I get my post stuck between in post sequence top down and bottom up, while political might to the left and spiritual freedom to the right, rule of law defining tomorrow, and genetics put me here so far.

nefarious101 » 17 Jan 2025, 7:48 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 7:48 am

Hey Karen....

Like the way you Pootin' Sniffers use emoji's to make it look like your posts are funny. 

Takes all the effort out of having to display wit you might not possess doesn't it?

Oak Tree!      

Fertilizer!      

Light Bulb!      

Well Karen.....seems I just destroyed your ability to be perceived as witty and humorous doesn't it?

OOPS!

You okay now, Betty?

THERE'S A GOOD GIRL - have a cry.
 

Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2025, 12:16 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 12:16 am

I call ****. The gelding of slaves is a far cry from pretending they are women. Castrati have always been a thing apart. No rancher ever mistook his steers for cows, and no society has ever mistaken a eunuch for a woman. That is just pure silliness.

Who said anything of 'mistaking' a man for a woman? The Greeks back in the Alexander the Great days knew the difference. The point is that they didn't give a **** if a man wanted to take on the role of a woman and try to look like a woman. Of course they knew he had a schlong. Duh. It was just the way they were. I don't agree with it, it's stupid. However, AI is correct in saying that some cultures are like that. Chatgpt didn't agree or disagree with it. It was simply just saying what other cultures did and still do. It's not AIs job to tell us what to think. At least it isn't supposed to. It was just saying that not all cultures are onboard with a common definition. 

Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2025, 12:10 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 12:10 am

Name one.

Every culture around the world, including ours, views gender as binary. 

There is a cancer in our culture that is trying and failing to change that. 

ChatGPT is doing precisely what Skans has said: drawing on the bias of its controllers.

****.Hijra (South Asia)

• In India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh, the hijra community is recognized as a third gender.

Kathoey (Thailand)

• Kathoey, or "ladyboys," are individuals assigned male at birth who express femininity. While they may be categorized as transgender in a Western context, they often have a culturally specific role in Thai society.

Bissu (Bugis People of Sulawesi, Indonesia)

• The Bugis people recognize five genders: male, female, calabai (assigned male but embodying feminine traits), calalai (assigned female but embodying masculine traits), and bissu (androgynous or transcendent gender roles with spiritual significance).

Khoisan Cultures (Southern Africa)

• Some anthropologists have noted that certain Khoisan-speaking societies conceptualize gender with less rigid binary distinctions, often focusing more on roles and contributions to the community than strict male/female divisions.

Cheyenne and Lakota Tribes (North America)

• Among some Cheyenne and Lakota communities, gender is understood less as a binary and more as a spectrum, often shaped by spiritual roles and societal contributions.

 

Vegas » 17 Jan 2025, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 10:18 am

Who said anything of 'mistaking' a man for a woman? The Greeks back in the Alexander the Great days knew the difference. The point is that they didn't give a **** if a man wanted to take on the role of a woman and try to look like a woman. Of course they knew he had a schlong. Duh. It was just the way they were. I don't agree with it, it's stupid. However, AI is correct in saying that some cultures are like that. Chatgpt didn't agree or disagree with it. It was simply just saying what other cultures did and still do. It's not AIs job to tell us what to think. At least it isn't supposed to. It was just saying that not all cultures are onboard with a common definition.

Does this mean you're going to change the thread title?
 

RebelGator » 17 Jan 2025, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 10:26 am

Does this mean you're going to change the thread title?

It's not my thread. 

Vegas » 17 Jan 2025, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 10:28 am

It's not my thread.

, my bad.  

RebelGator » 17 Jan 2025, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 10:30 am

, my bad.

AI is awesome...for now anyway. In a year, who knows what it's going to do to us?

Vegas » 17 Jan 2025, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 10:23 am

****.Hijra (South Asia)

• In India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh, the hijra community is recognized as a third gender. Another name for "***".

Kathoey (Thailand)

• Kathoey, or "ladyboys," are individuals assigned male at birth who express femininity. While they may be categorized as transgender in a Western context, they often have a culturally specific role in Thai society.  Another name for "***".

Bissu (Bugis People of Sulawesi, Indonesia)

• The Bugis people recognize five genders: male, female, calabai (assigned male but embodying feminine traits), calalai (assigned female but embodying masculine traits), and bissu (androgynous or transcendent gender roles with spiritual significance). Another name for "***" and "dykes"

Khoisan Cultures (Southern Africa)

• Some anthropologists have noted that certain Khoisan-speaking societies conceptualize gender with less rigid binary distinctions, often focusing more on roles and contributions to the community than strict male/female divisions. ***.

Cheyenne and Lakota Tribes (North America)

• Among some Cheyenne and Lakota communities, gender is understood less as a binary and more as a spectrum, often shaped by spiritual roles and societal contributions. ***.

 

Vegas » 17 Jan 2025, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 10:23 am

****.Hijra (South Asia)

• In India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh, the hijra community is recognized as a third gender.

You said recognized as women. No **** they're a third **** gender. They sure as hell ain't men - but they ain't women, either, and women have a right to their own spaces away from freaks.

If you'd care to defend the argument you made, I am standing by.

Vegas » 17 Jan 2025, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 10:23 am

Kathoey (Thailand)

• Kathoey, or "ladyboys," are individuals assigned male at birth who express femininity. While they may be categorized as transgender in a Western context, they often have a culturally specific role in Thai society.

AGAIN, no ****.

Vegas » 17 Jan 2025, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 10:23 am

Bissu (Bugis People of Sulawesi, Indonesia)

• The Bugis people recognize five genders: male, female, calabai (assigned male but embodying feminine traits), calalai (assigned female but embodying masculine traits), and bissu (androgynous or transcendent gender roles with spiritual significance).

So what you are saying is, they do NOT recognize men - not even eunuchs - as women. So, you've changed your position, then. Thanks.

Vegas » 17 Jan 2025, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 10:23 am

Khoisan Cultures (Southern Africa)

• Some anthropologists have noted that certain Khoisan-speaking societies conceptualize gender with less rigid binary distinctions, often focusing more on roles and contributions to the community than strict male/female divisions.

If you do not know what is wrong with this "evidence," ^ I am not going to tell you. You're grown.

Vegas » 17 Jan 2025, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 10:23 am

Cheyenne and Lakota Tribes (North America)

• Among some Cheyenne and Lakota communities, gender is understood less as a binary and more as a spectrum, often shaped by spiritual roles and societal contributions.

Among many board members, **** like this ^ is considered laughable. It also does not back your claim.
 

Vegas » 17 Jan 2025, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 10:18 am

Who said anything of 'mistaking' a man for a woman? The Greeks back in the Alexander the Great days knew the difference. The point is that they didn't give a **** if a man wanted to take on the role of a woman and try to look like a woman. Of course they knew he had a schlong. Duh. It was just the way they were. I don't agree with it, it's stupid. However, AI is correct in saying that some cultures are like that. Chatgpt didn't agree or disagree with it. It was simply just saying what other cultures did and still do. It's not AIs job to tell us what to think. At least it isn't supposed to. It was just saying that not all cultures are onboard with a common definition.

I took issue with your "different definitions of gender" claim. The acknowledgment that a cut male is not the same as an uncut male is not a "different definition of gender." We have different words for freak, same as they did. Neither you nor AI are going to post evidence of this **** being normalized and people pretending the **** that is being forced on us by the parasite class. It does not exist. 
 

Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2025, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 3:25 pm

You said recognized as women. No **** they're a third **** gender. They sure as hell ain't men - but they ain't women, either, and women have a right to their own spaces away from freaks.

If you'd care to defend the argument you made, I am standing by.

AGAIN, no ****.

So what you are saying is, they do NOT recognize men - not even eunuchs - as women. So, you've changed your position, then. Thanks.

If you do not know what is wrong with this "evidence," ^ I am not going to tell you. You're grown.

Among many board members, **** like this ^ is considered laughable. It also does not back your claim.

I am not changing any of my stances. You asked for cultures that believe there are more than one gender...so there you have it. I gave you examples. Do you remember your own damn question? 

The impact of AI will be more noticeable when it’s fused with robotics, and the avg peon sees them on a daily basis. Until then it’s better to assume for now it’s a cash grab for disgruntled investors.

The bubble will pop, the advancements will pave the way in another decade or so.

Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2025, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 8:25 am

You okay now, Betty?

THERE'S A GOOD GIRL - have a cry.

Hey Karen...

ChlorFIT, CPVC, 1/2 in Nominal Pipe Size      

stainless steel farmhouse sink with drainboard       
 
 

LowIQTrash » 17 Jan 2025, 3:53 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 3:53 pm

The impact of AI will be more noticeable when it’s fused with robotics, and the avg peon sees them on a daily basis. Until then it’s better to assume for now it’s a cash grab for disgruntled investors.

The bubble will pop, the advancements will pave the way in another decade or so.

Nvidia up 4.14 today.
 

Vegas » 17 Jan 2025, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 3:36 pm

I am not changing any of my stances. You asked for cultures that believe there are more than one gender...so there you have it. I gave you examples. Do you remember your own damn question?

Lol.

I still call ****. Those cultures acknowledge the existence of sexual freaks. They still recognize the binary. When a child is born, NONE of those cultures wonder, is it a boy, a girl, a flackervaunter, a flishmacon - no. It's a boy or a girl at birth, because those are the choices. That other **** is all after-market and NOT considered biological. More like pathological. 
 

nefarious101 » 17 Jan 2025, 4:16 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 4:16 pm

Hey Karen...

ChlorFIT, CPVC, 1/2 in Nominal Pipe Size      

stainless steel farmhouse sink with drainboard     

Looks like you've gone full mode, son. 

Hope you're okay.
 

Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2025, 7:48 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 7:48 pm

Lol.

I still call ****. Those cultures acknowledge the existence of sexual freaks. They still recognize the binary. When a child is born, NONE of those cultures wonder, is it a boy, a girl, a flackervaunter, a flishmacon - no. It's a boy or a girl at birth, because those are the choices. That other **** is all after-market and NOT considered biological. More like pathological.

They clearly believe there are more than 2 genders. Why is it so hard to believe that there are cultures around the world that believe stupid ****? There are still cultures in the Middle East and South Asia where 'honor killing' is justifiable under Islamic or tribal laws. That is when a family will kill a relative if that person did something dishonorable.  They also have some cultures there that still practice female genital mutilation because they believe it promotes purity. 

These are just modern examples that still exist. Just think of all the examples we could find going back to the dawn of mankind. Why is it so hard to believe that some groups can be that **** stupid? 

Vegas » 17 Jan 2025, 8:41 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 8:41 pm

They clearly believe there are more than 2 genders. Why is it so hard to believe that there are cultures around the world that believe stupid ****? There are still cultures in the Middle East and South Asia where 'honor killing' is justifiable under Islamic or tribal laws. That is when a family will kill a relative if that person did something dishonorable.  They also have some cultures there that still practice female genital mutilation because they believe it promotes purity. 

These are just modern examples that still exist. Just think of all the examples we could find going back to the dawn of mankind. Why is it so hard to believe that some groups can be that **** stupid?

Is it your thesis that parents understand their babies to be open slates and have no idea how to raise them - as girls or boys, - since they might be something else?