To make this "dream come true" single family homes all across rural America have been torn down and replaced with 3 story apartment buildings that have banks and shops on the ground floor.Majik » 16 Jan 2025, 8:28 am » wrote: ↑ The SmartLA 2028 blueprint displays a map of Pacific Palisades, Santa Monica, and Hollywood areas, now seriously fire damaged. What a coincidence!
In light of the devastating fires in Los Angeles, it is important to mention that Los Angeles is one of the 100 or so cities that are part of the C40 Cities Initiative, a program developed by the United Nations to address the manufactured crisis of global warming/climate change and the globalist goals to remake the cities into their vision. This vision happens to coincide with The Ideal Communist City. A 166-page book, written in 1968 in Milan, describes in detail the architects’ vision of building the perfect communist city.The livable communities website describes Mobility as “Creating a walkable, bikeable life where everyone can safely and pleasantly walk, bike, trike, use a golf cart, and access great transit, allows for housing without parking – a key tool in creating abundance of homes that are affordable to workers and moderate to low income households.”An Urbanate will have all facilities needed for a prison-like community, i.e., schools, hospitals, shopping malls, waste management, recycling, sports centers, and public green areas. It is presented as a resort type where residents will have the highest standard of living possible. Because cities have been built by poor planning, the technate wants to erase them and build urbanates from a clean slate. Why bother to solve problems in the existing cities? The future of urban consumption in a 1.5°C world
Klaus Schwab of the WEF said at the World Government Summit in Dubai in 2015 that Los Angeles will be “Private Car-Driven-Free by 2030, transforming highways into parks and other public spheres.” Klaus Schwab: Los Angeles to Be "Private Car-Driven-Free" by 2030
https://canadafreepress.com/article/a-communist-urbanate
They are doing the same thing here in Canada ....*GHETTOBLASTER » 16 Jan 2025, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑ To make this "dream come true" single family homes all across rural America have been torn down and replaced with 3 story apartment buildings that have banks and shops on the ground floor.
Where a family of 5 once lived in a farm house are now where 100 people [who blew into town from who knows where] call it their home.
Many of these "Sardinecanistan Communes" are within easy walking distance of the nearby Walmart and those megalithic Amazon Warehouses [that are also popping up every where corn fields once stood.
My little brain started seeing that when was 13 years old and back then I didn't make hyde nor hair about it. But I do remember noticing it. Told that was progress and cannot go backwards in relative time theatrics on the world stage.
I do not believe such cities should come about by force, or that people should be herded into them against their will. But I DO believe that urban corridors can attract millions if they are well managed. I have lived in an urban corridor that was rather badly managed - San Francisco in the late nineties. And even with BAD management, it was a rather lovely way to live. Good mass transit, no need to own a car but every opportunity to rent one if one were needed for some immediate purpose, small independent specialist grocers - a butcher, a green grocer, a dairy, a baker, an irish store, tons of indy coffee houses that served breakfasts and brunches, lots of green space, extremely walkable, everything quite near by - just a joy to live in. Lots of people means lots of opportunities and possibilities. Urban corridors are environmentally friendly. But they are most suitable for young folks, while building careers. They are places to be cycled through, during a particular time of life. I'm sure there are plenty of people who will find them a good place to be born and to die, but most will want more space when they start families. Lotta old *** in san francisco. It suits their needs. I liked living there - but I would never want to raise kids there.
So an attempt to make it look like an act of God or force of nature(Karma) is OK in your mind? Organized reasonable doubt is debunked. Just the people defending it won't stop. Those people are all in the chain of command organizing reasonable doubt every day in every village raising great great grandchildren to believe there is a tomorrow next rotation of the planet dawn to dusk manipulating minds midnight to noon daily. and punishing anyone resisting noon to midnight same rotation.Cannonpointer » 16 Jan 2025, 11:16 pm » wrote: ↑ I do not believe such cities should come about by force, .....
C40 is a candy coated Trojan horse that seems as a good idea on it's surface .....Cannonpointer » 16 Jan 2025, 11:16 pm » wrote: ↑ I do not believe such cities should come about by force, or that people should be herded into them against their will. But I DO believe that urban corridors can attract millions if they are well managed. I have lived in an urban corridor that was rather badly managed - San Francisco in the late nineties. And even with BAD management, it was a rather lovely way to live. Good mass transit, no need to own a car but every opportunity to rent one if one were needed for some immediate purpose, small independent specialist grocers - a butcher, a green grocer, a dairy, a baker, an irish store, tons of indy coffee houses that served breakfasts and brunches, lots of green space, extremely walkable, everything quite near by - just a joy to live in. Lots of people means lots of opportunities and possibilities. Urban corridors are environmentally friendly. But they are most suitable for young folks, while building careers. They are places to be cycled through, during a particular time of life. I'm sure there are plenty of people who will find them a good place to be born and to die, but most will want more space when they start families. Lotta old *** in san francisco. It suits their needs. I liked living there - but I would never want to raise kids there.
I always go with the middle option.31stArrival » 17 Jan 2025, 6:52 am » wrote: ↑
So an attempt to make it look like an act of God or force of nature(Karma) is OK in your mind?
Yeah, that is some seriously **** up ****. I had not heard of C4O before this.Majik » 17 Jan 2025, 8:18 am » wrote: ↑ C40 is a candy coated Trojan horse that seems as a good idea on it's surface .....
until you
realize what their real agenda is ....
another C4O test site was Maui....
and it was mysteriously destroyed by wildfires due to supposed mismanagement paving the way for C40 ....
And guess what ...
L.A. is another C40 test site....
and it's being destroyed by wildfires and mismanagement which is also paving the way for it's C40 agenda ....
there is a pattern forming ....
https://www.c40.org/funders-partners/
They are an extension of the WEF...Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2025, 8:27 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah, that is some seriously **** up ****. I had not heard of C4O before this.
https://youtu.be/L-PwJe7ldTI?si=AUpaMZrDlrxDrGNmCannonpointer » 16 Jan 2025, 11:16 pm » wrote: ↑ I do not believe such cities should come about by force, or that people should be herded into them against their will. But I DO believe that urban corridors can attract millions if they are well managed. I have lived in an urban corridor that was rather badly managed - San Francisco in the late nineties. And even with BAD management, it was a rather lovely way to live. Good mass transit, no need to own a car but every opportunity to rent one if one were needed for some immediate purpose, small independent specialist grocers - a butcher, a green grocer, a dairy, a baker, an irish store, tons of indy coffee houses that served breakfasts and brunches, lots of green space, extremely walkable, everything quite near by - just a joy to live in. Lots of people means lots of opportunities and possibilities. Urban corridors are environmentally friendly. But they are most suitable for young folks, while building careers. They are places to be cycled through, during a particular time of life. I'm sure there are plenty of people who will find them a good place to be born and to die, but most will want more space when they start families. Lotta old *** in san francisco. It suits their needs. I liked living there - but I would never want to raise kids there.
I give the only two options a brain has to take in surviving the binary code of zero or one displacement alive now as specifically inhabiting space here as alive surrounded by the universe sustaining one's time since conceived in its origin form of a fertilized cell the nucleus becomes the brain able to navigate space cradle to grave on its own time alive.Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2025, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑ I always go with the middle option.
You didn't give three options - you're cooking the books.
I still need a third option. I always pick the middle one.31stArrival » 17 Jan 2025, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑ I give the only two options a brain has to take in surviving the binary code of zero or one displacement alive now as specifically inhabiting space here as alive surrounded by the universe sustaining one's time since conceived in its origin form of a fertilized cell the nucleus becomes the brain able to navigate space cradle to grave on its own time alive.
No exceptions due to social consensus saying otherwise every generation gap to each ancestral lineage living today.
you have reasonable doubt promising better tomorrows 12 hours a day 7 days a week and by the way, every one of those seven days has an artificial 3 minutes and 56 seconds of factual time added daily that doesn't happen per rotation of the planet.Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2025, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑ I still need a third option. I always pick the middle one.
your time evolving has your body stabilized in this position of possibilities cradle to grave while your brain only inhabits the core/center of space time alive in this atmosphere.

Don't you love the obvious fusion of planned obsolescence and plausible deniability teaming up together.Majik » 17 Jan 2025, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑ Evacuations, Road Closures Begin as Fire Engulfs World’s Largest Battery Plant in California
A massive fire broke out at a Californian power plant early Friday morning, threatening one of the largest battery energy storage facilities in the world.
The blaze began in a building containing lithium-ion batteries hours earlier, an official at the Monterey County Sheriff’s office told the BBC.
The Moss Landing power plant, run by Vistra Corp, was evacuated, as were people in the surrounding area. No injuries were reported.
Officials are not actively fighting the fire, the Monterey Sheriff spokesperson said, and are instead leaving the building and the batteries to burn on the advice of fire experts.
Hundreds of people have been ordered to evacuate and part of Highway 1 in Northern California has been closed.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025 ... alifornia/
Can't have lithium plants in Northern California ....
It doesn't fit the C40 agenda for California . ..