Liberal Forum

I am a huge proponent of AI. I work with it. I help with he algorithms, mathematics, neural maps, and the deep learning. Trust me when I say this needs to be regulated by people who know what they are doing. It's powerful. However, I also believe humans will find a way to adapt to it, regardless of its implications. 


 To the OP's question

It already has, if you know how to use it. Open ai can help us think differently. It doesn't just give answers. If you use it to do the work for you, rather than have it teach you how to look at things differently, then you can expect it took take over your own imagination. If you use it to teach you how to think the way it thinks, which is pretty damn clever and profound, then you will open your cognitive neural ways to all sorts of possibilities. Let me explain. In machine learning, the idea isn't for humans to teach machines how to think. The idea is to teach the machine to teach itself how to think. That is the gap. We need to figure out what it learned about thinking that we humans fall short on. 

Either AI will replace us or it will complete us. That depends on you. 


 

If you want to learn something now. What do you say. " Google it "

PhiloBeddo » 20 Jan 2025, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jan 2025, 11:45 am

If you want to learn something now. What do you say. " Google it "

That's not learning. That's retrieving an answer from someone who already has learned it. 

Vegas » 20 Jan 2025, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jan 2025, 11:46 am

That's not learning. That's retrieving an answer from someone who already has learned it.

It's learning If you don't know something, you get the answer, now you know. That's learning. 

Vegas » 20 Jan 2025, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jan 2025, 11:30 am

I am a huge proponent of AI. I work with it. I help with he algorithms, mathematics, neural maps, and the deep learning. Trust me when I say this needs to be regulated by people who know what they are doing. It's powerful. However, I also believe humans will find a way to adapt to it, regardless of its implications. 


 To the OP's question

It already has, if you know how to use it. Open ai can help us think differently. It doesn't just give answers. If you use it to do the work for you, rather than have it teach you how to look at things differently, then you can expect it took take over your own imagination. If you use it to teach you how to think the way it thinks, which is pretty damn clever and profound, then you will open your cognitive neural ways to all sorts of possibilities. Let me explain. In machine learning, the idea isn't for humans to teach machines how to think. The idea is to teach the machine to teach itself how to think. That is the gap. We need to figure out what it learned about thinking that we humans fall short on. 

Either AI will replace us or it will complete us. That depends on you. 


 

ha ha ha ha ha ha ha bull crap. The only thing AI saves is absolute corruption of next generations done so far, forward.

PhiloBeddo » 20 Jan 2025, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jan 2025, 11:53 am

It's learning If you don't know something, you get the answer, now you know. That's learning.

No, it isn't. Learning is where you know how the answer came to be. If you just copy all the answers on a math test, that doesn't mean you learned how to do the math. You just learned to get the answers. 

Vegas » 20 Jan 2025, 12:42 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jan 2025, 12:42 pm

No, it isn't. Learning is where you know how the answer came to be. If you just copy all the answers on a math test, that doesn't mean you learned how to do the math. You just learned to get the answers. 

how do the numbers of reproductions add up ancestrally since inception of ancestral lineages lived in series parallel situation every generation living in this atmosphere left alive, today.

You have to be inclusive of all life forms existed as lived so far.

The natural way it worked million of years ago still works this rotation.

Knowledge is learned by experience. Understanding is achieved surviving adapting in series parallel positions equally timed apart by the moment here regardless which generation gap one arrive in so far.