Liberal Forum

Sumela » 21 Jan 2025, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jan 2025, 12:12 pm

Hell yes.  Suddenly Bush/Cheney were big spending libbies.
When they had been that THE WHOLE **** TIME....
well, for never-ending wars anyway.  

I recall cons becoming 'libertarians' overnight.  Alex Jones
popularity exploded.  Actually, some pretty fun times!

ConTards are equally as eaten up with **** as are LibTards.

2 sides of the MemeCoin

Oh, no, sir. No sir! NO SIR!

Not just on the foreign front. On the DOMESTIC front. 

The bush administration created homeland security. Pushed through the patriot act - a big fat **** on the Constitution that the democrats were delighted to make "bipartisan." They created medicare part d - a social program. They created the american dream act - a give away to your of coloreds, to your bankers, to your builders, to your real estate industry, and to God knows who else. They spent so **** much money on such counter-productive **** - on pushing the housing boom to the busting point - that they crashed the **** economy, and stole the next generation's futures to pay for it. 

NO ONE ON EARTH spend like a republican. The minute they get the check book, the party hat store runs out of inventory. 

Fuelman » 21 Jan 2025, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jan 2025, 10:39 am

Hmm, I had you in high school in 2008. You must be older. Keep pushing out this "great crash", you will eventually be right.

BV treats the data as gospel, at best it's a ball park number. The "birth-death model" for business can be "wildly inaccurate" (not my words). What could go wrong with *** pull numbers from historical data? Makes a person wonder how accurate the end result is and just how accurate are the other models used.

Conjobs aren't the only ones that move to the middle, there is crazy in both parties.

The difference is I will be putting all my liquid $$$ on the line. Boomers were told to buy and hold for decades…that antiquated thinking will come back and haunt them.

Real estate investors are extremely overleveraged and underwater. They will not survive.

Welcome to the Big Short 2.0 
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 21 Jan 2025, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jan 2025, 11:27 am

Thanks for  the BUZZ KILLING reminder that we could very well be getting set up for a life changing  GUT PUNCH from the [[[JWO]]]       
[You're undoubtedly going to take a lot of heat from the Peanut Gallery for making this bold prediction...but once again you present a well reasoned argument for how and why the next financial collapse will occur.]
We can't allow ourselves to be ruled by [[[JWO BLACK MAIL]]]  though.
Might as well not hold any elections or aspire to make life in the USA better for our children.

The JWO loves pulling liquidity out of the system to reset asset prices and drive middle class and even lower tier millionaires into bankruptcy 

Kind of like how the fires collapsed Pacific Palisades’ property prices…   Lots of vultures picking up distressed properties from 70 y old retirees…they are “no longer needed” for the <Agenda>

Skans » 21 Jan 2025, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑

21 Jan 2025, 10:39 am

I still have a soft spot in my heart for Dick Cheny.  His kids are worthless, but the man struck fear in the hearts of Arabs."SOMEONE'S GOTTA OCCUPY AFGHANISTAN"

Ok, but did you come out and say it back when they were at 23% approval? 

Your cohorts pretended to be “libertarians” all along   

*GHETTOBLASTER » 21 Jan 2025, 4:00 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jan 2025, 4:00 pm

In the time it took you to type that out you could have simply answered my question.

What was the point of your incoherent rant...?
You actually DID predict the Trump was going to avoid a crash..but you failed to explain  how he was going to accomplish that with an unemployment problem that is much worse than what has been reported.

This is what you said word for word....

If your IQ was 2 points higher, you'd be smarter than a rock.

NO WHERE did I say a damn thing about any "stock market crash". Your attempt to "read into" what I said makes you dumber than a sack of hammers.

Blackvegetable » 21 Jan 2025, 8:13 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jan 2025, 8:13 pm

Wow...the coherence...

Your antenna doesn't pick up all the channels now does it??

If we put your brain on the edge of a razor blade, it would look like a BB rolling down a 10 lane highway.

Cannonpointer » 21 Jan 2025, 11:45 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jan 2025, 11:45 pm

Oh, no, sir. No sir! NO SIR!

Not just on the foreign front. On the DOMESTIC front. 

The bush administration created homeland security. Pushed through the patriot act - a big fat **** on the Constitution that the democrats were delighted to make "bipartisan." They created medicare part d - a social program. They created the american dream act - a give away to your of coloreds, to your bankers, to your builders, to your real estate industry, and to God knows who else. They spent so **** much money on such counter-productive **** - on pushing the housing boom to the busting point - that they crashed the **** economy, and stole the next generation's futures to pay for it. 

NO ONE ON EARTH spend like a republican. The minute they get the check book, the party hat store runs out of inventory. 

What is personal liberty vs human rights to pretend life isn't self evident time living eternally separated adaptingto the moment here limited to adapting with each heartbeat forward now? here are 4 variations of PC
1. personally conceived
2. personal choice
3. public consensus
4. political correctness.
5. perpetual corruption.

LowIQTrash » 20 Jan 2025, 11:38 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Jan 2025, 11:38 pm

Remember back in 2008, Bush/Cheney had like a 23% approval rating, the stock market was crashing, and everyone pretended they never supported those 2?

(I distinctly remember a large contingency of political junkies coming out and saying they were "libertarians" around that time. Just a coincidence I'm sure... )

That's going to happen in 2027 - 2028 with tRump.

BROWN is going to have the last laugh. 

----------------------------------------------

And then we re-enter this cycle again:

Conjob: [Insert Democrat]'s deficits are out of control!

BROWN: Have you EVER voted for a POTUS in the past 30 years who bequeathed a smaller deficit than the one he inherited unto his successor?
 
------------------------------------------------

P.S. The jobs/unemployment data is/was fake and it will soon be "revealed" how truly sh*tty the economy is. Lots of unrealized losses just waiting to go kaboom...

Ironically the one thing BROWN insists is real (the "Stats") is what will cause tRump's downfall.

yea I remember I bought a house 

*Beekeeper » 22 Jan 2025, 5:39 am » wrote: ↑

22 Jan 2025, 5:39 am

If your IQ was 2 points higher, you'd be smarter than a rock.

NO WHERE did I say a damn thing about any "stock market crash". Your attempt to "read into" what I said makes you dumber than a sack of hammers.

The OP is the one who predicted a crash.

YOU were the one who flew off the handle like an autistic child... saying that he was FOS but you failed to explain how pulling 2 Trillion out of circulation wasn't going to cause anything like that to happen.

Looks like you shot your mouth off once again and now your only way out of it is to "Play Dumb".
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 22 Jan 2025, 7:11 am » wrote: ↑

22 Jan 2025, 7:11 am

The OP is the one who predicted a crash.

YOU were the one who flew off the handle like an autistic child... saying that he was FOS but you failed to explain how pulling 2 Trillion out of circulation wasn't going to cause anything like that to happen.

Looks like you shot your mouth off once again and now your only way out of it is to "Play Dumb".

Can you point out where the OP said a damn thing about "pulling 2 trillion out of circulation" by Trump??

Not there, huh??

YOU'RE A **** IDIOT!!

*Beekeeper » 22 Jan 2025, 7:14 am » wrote: ↑

22 Jan 2025, 7:14 am

Can you point out where the OP said a damn thing about "pulling 2 trillion out of circulation" by Trump??

Oooops..

I assumed you knew what "pulling liquidity out of the system"  means as far as what the current plans are.

I shouldn't have assumed that you knew enough about this topic so that I wouldn't have to explain it all to you..
Well here is your crash course......

"Central banks purchased tens of trillions of dollars worth of government bonds and other assets in a bid to bring down longer-term borrowing costs and stimulate their economies. This measure, known as “quantitative easing,” or QE, created a flood of cheap cash and gave policymakers newfound sway over markets. Investors called it the era of “easy money.”But since inflation hit its highest level in a generation last year, central banks have embarked on the quest — unprecedented in scale — of shrinking their bloated balance sheets by selling securities or letting them mature and disappear from their books. “Quantitative tightening,” or QT, by top central banks will suck $2 trillion in liquidity out of the financial system over the next two years, according to a recent analysis by Fitch Ratings."

https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/19/economy/ ... index.html
 
 

*Beekeeper » 22 Jan 2025, 5:41 am » wrote: ↑

22 Jan 2025, 5:41 am

Your antenna doesn't pick up all the channels now does it??

If we put your brain on the edge of a razor blade, it would look like a BB rolling down a 10 lane highway.

Zzzzzzz

Vegas » 21 Jan 2025, 10:29 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jan 2025, 10:29 pm

As always. No intelligent rebuttal.

I see I stumped you again. 

1, Here comes his "The **** writes itself. I don't need to rebut anything."     

You're a **** rube.

Blackvegetable » 22 Jan 2025, 8:15 am » wrote: ↑

22 Jan 2025, 8:15 am

You're a **** rube.

You are an intellectual stooge by choice. And ancestral position by no choice of your own.

Blackvegetable » 22 Jan 2025, 8:15 am » wrote: ↑

22 Jan 2025, 8:15 am

I am a **** rube.

We all know that

FJB » 22 Jan 2025, 8:28 am » wrote: ↑

22 Jan 2025, 8:28 am

We all know that

I tried to help.

LowIQTrash » 22 Jan 2025, 1:32 am » wrote: ↑

22 Jan 2025, 1:32 am

Ok, but did you come out and say it back when they were at 23% approval? 

Your cohorts pretended to be “libertarians” all along 

Dick Cheney was a ruthles SOB back in the day.  He's a limp-dick, lesbian-loving fruitcake now - people change.
 

Skans » 22 Jan 2025, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑

22 Jan 2025, 9:05 am

Dick Cheney was a ruthles SOB back in the day.  He's a limp-dick, lesbian-loving fruitcake now - people change.
 

Population changes with each ancestor uniquely timed apart now in series parallel proportions of numbers inhabiting space here gemetrically by numbers, geologically by chromosomes, geographically positioned occupyingspce one at a time now.

Accountability given for my time equal to any others time alive all previous generation gaps, the one I am in today being 1 of 4 grandparents since I arrived one of each great great grandchildren to my 16 great great grandparents and each generation gap after their birth.

Cannonpointer » 21 Jan 2025, 11:32 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jan 2025, 11:32 pm

Just stop. You look like a **** idiot. You are not addressing what he says - you are addressing him, personally. And you are doing it very stupidly, since everyone on this board knows that he sees biden the same way he saw bush: as a failure.

And he is absolutely spot on with his claim that half you *** became overnight libertardians - even though none of you knew how to pull it off. 

Read the OP, and address his points. He has a thesis. Can you spot it and generate an rebuttal?

Is he or is he not addressing his own opinion about the failure he thinks Trump will be over the next 4 years?  That is NOT a "thesis", you **** moron!  I responded to his fact-less opinion by pointing out how virtually every Biden/Harris supporter believes and claims the same thing, which is nothing but a continuation of their ignorant rants prior to losing the election.  He's learned NOTHING since Democrats got their asses handed to them in the Trump landslide victory, and deserve nothing more in the way of rebuttal from me.

Tell you what.
You respond to the opinions posted here as you want, and stop expecting others to follow the prescription you demand.
Is that a deal, Adolf?
 

Blackvegetable » 22 Jan 2025, 8:15 am » wrote: ↑

22 Jan 2025, 8:15 am

You're a **** rube.

The usual level 0 response.