Liberal Forum

*GHETTOBLASTER » 27 Jan 2025, 5:14 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Jan 2025, 5:14 pm

I've known about this movie but haven't seen it yet. 
I wonder if John Silviera made just  a nickle from it...?
I don't know anything  about what THE OFFICIAL LIBERTARIAN PARTY position is with respect to allowing Big Business to make their own rules and not having to abide by any regulations is.
I really have no idea...but I think only the most radical members of any political or religious sect take the ALL OR NOTHING path with their belief system.

Libertarianism was a psyop concocted by the Tiny Hats back in the late 1800s/early 1900s (Ludwig von Mises, Frederich Hayek just to name 2 of the more prominent names) to allow the Tiny Hats and their wealthy shabbos goy subordinates to take "rents" from the g0yim with impunity under the guise of "freedom."

The big business backers of Morgan, Dupont, etc. had a clear interest in establishing near-monopolies in "Big Business" by acquiring smaller, failed businesses. Every bank run, panic, or stock market crash (like the crash of 1907) would lead to lucrative opportunities to consolidate more and more market share into fewer hands, which was exactly what the Tiny Hats wanted. 

Tiny Hat Libertarianism professes to be "against" the Federal Reserve...except the Federal Reserve was established with the full blessings of the Tiny Hats. 

Don't confuse wanting to build / own your own house with minimal property taxes / only a small # of reasonable regulations (like fire hazard protection) with the "Libertarian" political movement. 

 
 

LowIQTrash » 02 Feb 2025, 5:36 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2025, 5:36 pm

Libertarianism was a psyop concocted by the Tiny Hats back in the late 1800s/early 1900s (Ludwig von Mises, Frederich Hayek just to name 2 of the more prominent names) to allow the Tiny Hats and their wealthy shabbos goy subordinates to take "rents" from the g0yim with impunity under the guise of "freedom."

The big business backers of Morgan, Dupont, etc. had a clear interest in establishing near-monopolies in "Big Business" by acquiring smaller, failed businesses. Every bank run, panic, or stock market crash (like the crash of 1907) would lead to lucrative opportunities to consolidate more and more market share into fewer hands, which was exactly what the Tiny Hats wanted. 

Tiny Hat Libertarianism professes to be "against" the Federal Reserve...except the Federal Reserve was established with the full blessings of the Tiny Hats. 

Don't confuse wanting to build / own your own house with minimal property taxes / only a small # of reasonable regulations (like fire hazard protection) with the "Libertarian" political movement.

Thanks for the information..!

The THs were very busy establishing dominance in the USA around 1900 once the dirty work of evicting the Indians and Mexicans was done by the Goyim.
So let me guess...if I do a quick search of the American Libertarian movement it will be full of THFC last names who take credit as  the founding fathers..    
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 02 Feb 2025, 6:19 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2025, 6:19 pm

Thanks for the information..!

The THs were very busy establishing dominance in the USA around 1900 once the dirty work of evicting the Indians and Mexicans was done by the Goyim.
So let me guess...if I do a quick search of the American Libertarian movement it will be full of THFC last names who take credit as  the founding fathers..  

I wouldn't be shocked if the THFCs waged ideological warfare in pre-Roman times, arguing it was their "right" to engage in usury (because some seafaring merchants from Phoenicia needed loans to buy their first vessel). 

Times change, human nature doesn't. ~ Ancient proverb

Applies doubly to Tiny Hats.

*GHETTOBLASTER » 02 Feb 2025, 6:19 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2025, 6:19 pm

Thanks for the information..!

The THs were very busy establishing dominance in the USA around 1900 once the dirty work of evicting the Indians and Mexicans was done by the Goyim.
So let me guess...if I do a quick search of the American Libertarian movement it will be full of THFC last names who take credit as  the founding fathers..  

I feel some perspective is needed to further cement my argument.

As @FOS mentioned this at least 3x in debates with other members (like LibDave 2-3 years ago, to which I was a witness), power is a zero sum game. 

People who proclaim the dire need to "reduce the power of the state" always have a hidden motive in mind (or are naive teenagers who finished Atlas Shrugged and tried their first cigarette at a friend's Sweet 16 party before getting wasted on booze).

Motives, which, to nobody's shock, will not benefit you. 

---------------------------------------

The <[( JWO )]> was kicked out by European monarchs over the course of centuries. Raw state power. 

Meanwhile, under "liberal, freeDUMB-loving democracies," they have been allowed to thrive. Not once have they been expelled successfully.

Libertarianism = "Liberal, freeDUMB-loving democracies" minus <labor protections, environmental laws, state pensions or even minimal investment in public services> on steroids
 

LowIQTrash » 02 Feb 2025, 7:46 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2025, 7:46 pm

I feel some perspective is needed to further cement my argument.

As @FOS mentioned this at least 3x in debates with other members (like LibDave 2-3 years ago, to which I was a witness), power is a zero sum game. 

People who proclaim the dire need to "reduce the power of the state" always have a hidden motive in mind (or are naive teenagers who finished Atlas Shrugged and tried their first cigarette at a friend's Sweet 16 party before getting wasted on booze).

Motives, which, to nobody's shock, will not benefit you. 

---------------------------------------

The <[( JWO )]> was kicked out by European monarchs over the course of centuries. Raw state power. 

Meanwhile, under "liberal, freeDUMB-loving democracies," they have been allowed to thrive. Not once have they been expelled successfully.

Libertarianism = "Liberal, freeDUMB-loving democracies" minus <labor protections, environmental laws, state pensions or even minimal investment in public services> on steroids

When the [[[ACLU and SPLC]]] were first launched they both looked to the Casual      Observer to be as pure as the driven snow.
They both claim to be "fighting against totalitarianism" ...yet they are working 24 / 7 [along with the [[[ADL]]] to make it punishable by law for the two  of us to be having the discussion that we are having right now..
 

*GHETTO BLASTER » 02 Feb 2025, 7:58 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Feb 2025, 7:58 pm

When the [[[ACLU and SPLC]]] were first launched they both looked to the Casual      Observer to be as pure as the driven snow.
They both claim to be "fighting against totalitarianism" ...yet they are working 24 / 7 [along with the [[[ADL]]] to make it punishable by law for the two  of us to be having the discussion that we are having right now..
 

Evolving is totalitarian to the numbers in the food chain native to this atmospehre adapting forward one at a time since conceived, here now living as eternally spearated by the moment here. Even inorganic periodic elements evolve and with the end of their cycle reached by evaporation or decomposition of molecular mineral content.

Individually displaced self evident results cannot exist any other way.