Liberal Forum

So I’ve been contemplating the answer to this question:

”Why are conservatives, who normally elect fiscal profligates into office, suddenly concerned about budget restraints? And why is the Orange Dotard on board, given the establishment of DOGE?”

The Orange Dotard wasn’t concerned about “budget deficits” in his first term, so there must be another reason.

———————————

My understanding is that the <[( Tiny Hat Foreskin Chompers)]> are in agreement that they do not want the US Dollar to possibly fail as the primary currency for international trade.

This is why the Fed has kept rates relatively high (by post 2009 standards) and, I believe, it will continue to remain hawkish - although Trump intends to challenge that soon.

When the US economy undergoes a long period of prosperity (such as the 90s), the THFCs like to cook up plans to siphon off the wealth, whether it’s creating a bunch of fraudulent IPOs in a stock market bubble and subsequently pulling the rug, 0% FFR to enable more asset speculation / flipping, or multiple rounds of QE (where all the “newly printed money” goes to the THFCs) or sending more aid to Israel. 

However, the THFC are also keenly aware that the golden goose will at some point stop laying eggs, so a little “reset” needs to happen.

Continued fiscal profligacy will force rates to return to 0% and possibly unleash a currency crisis. 

The barren fields need to be tilled for the next harvest…that’s what “austerity” is for. 

————————

This is the same suspicion I had with DEI programs. It was designed to siphon off wealth from / within corporate boardrooms (among other agenda).

Now that DEI is no longer useful to “them,” probably because that cow is milked to death, “they” can get rid of it - at least for now. 

And the retarded conjobs will think “their” efforts comprising of angry social media posts / voting for the Orange Dotard are what changed the course of this country, when that is all an illusion. 
 

LowIQTrash » 28 Jan 2025, 5:07 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jan 2025, 5:07 pm

So I’ve been contemplating the answer to this question:

”Why are conservatives, who normally elect fiscal profligates into office, suddenly concerned about budget restraints? And why is the Orange Dotard on board, given the establishment of DOGE?”

The Orange Dotard wasn’t concerned about “budget deficits” in his first term, so there must be another reason.

———————————

My understanding is that the <[( Tiny Hat Foreskin Chompers)]> are in agreement that they do not want the US Dollar to possibly fail as the primary currency for international trade.

This is why the Fed has kept rates relatively high (by post 2009 standards) and, I believe, it will continue to remain hawkish - although Trump intends to challenge that soon.

When the US economy undergoes a long period of prosperity (such as the 90s), the THFCs like to cook up plans to siphon off the wealth, whether it’s creating a bunch of fraudulent IPOs in a stock market bubble and subsequently pulling the rug, 0% FFR to enable more asset speculation / flipping, or multiple rounds of QE (where all the “newly printed money” goes to the THFCs) or sending more aid to Israel. 

However, the THFC are also keenly aware that the golden goose will at some point stop laying eggs, so a little “reset” needs to happen.

Continued fiscal profligacy will force rates to return to 0% and possibly unleash a currency crisis. 

The barren fields need to be tilled for the next harvest…that’s what “austerity” is for. 

————————

This is the same suspicion I had with DEI programs. It was designed to siphon off wealth from / within corporate boardrooms (among other agenda).

Now that DEI is no longer useful to “them,” probably because that cow is milked to death, “they” can get rid of it - at least for now. 

And the retarded conjobs will think “their” efforts comprising of angry social media posts / voting for the Orange Dotard are what changed the course of this country, when that is all an illusion.

I've been know to chuckle at the idea...

I persist in my belief that it is because they're **** morons.
 

LowIQTrash » 28 Jan 2025, 5:07 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jan 2025, 5:07 pm

So I’ve been contemplating the answer to this question:

”Why are conservatives, who normally elect fiscal profligates into office, suddenly concerned about budget restraints? And why is the Orange Dotard on board, given the establishment of DOGE?”

The Orange Dotard wasn’t concerned about “budget deficits” in his first term, so there must be another reason.

———————————

My understanding is that the <[( Tiny Hat Foreskin Chompers)]> are in agreement that they do not want the US Dollar to possibly fail as the primary currency for international trade.

This is why the Fed has kept rates relatively high (by post 2009 standards) and, I believe, it will continue to remain hawkish - although Trump intends to challenge that soon.

When the US economy undergoes a long period of prosperity (such as the 90s), the THFCs like to cook up plans to siphon off the wealth, whether it’s creating a bunch of fraudulent IPOs in a stock market bubble and subsequently pulling the rug, 0% FFR to enable more asset speculation / flipping, or multiple rounds of QE (where all the “newly printed money” goes to the THFCs) or sending more aid to Israel. 

However, the THFC are also keenly aware that the golden goose will at some point stop laying eggs, so a little “reset” needs to happen.

Continued fiscal profligacy will force rates to return to 0% and possibly unleash a currency crisis. 

The barren fields need to be tilled for the next harvest…that’s what “austerity” is for. 

————————

This is the same suspicion I had with DEI programs. It was designed to siphon off wealth from / within corporate boardrooms (among other agenda).

Now that DEI is no longer useful to “them,” probably because that cow is milked to death, “they” can get rid of it - at least for now. 

And the retarded conjobs will think “their” efforts comprising of angry social media posts / voting for the Orange Dotard are what changed the course of this country, when that is all an illusion.

Good afternoon LIQT.
Another thought provoking post..!
Right or wrong I continue to marvel at your ability to explain the sequence of events that lead you to your predictions.
You are obviously quite the student of financial world history. .

Even though we only ever have  two candidates to vote for....your insights about how and why the economy gets manipulated by the THFCs is intel that the other Financial World Soothsayers fail to mention in their journals for some reason....  
Too bad Vanguard Investment Advisor Dan Weiner doesn't have you onboard for quarterly reports about what you think  the THFCs are planning to do next.
Hopefully you are saving all of your NHB  posts   for future reference......  
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 28 Jan 2025, 6:51 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jan 2025, 6:51 pm

Good afternoon LIQT.
Another thought provoking post..!
Right or wrong I continue to marvel at your ability to explain the sequence of events that lead you to your predictions.
You are obviously quite the student of financial world history. .

Even though we only ever have  two candidates to vote for....your insights about how and why the economy gets manipulated by the THFCs is intel that the other Financial World Soothsayers fail to mention in their journals for some reason....  
Too bad Vanguard Investment Advisor Dan Weiner doesn't have you onboard for quarterly reports about what you think  the THFCs are planning to do next.
Hopefully you are saving all of your NHB  posts   for future reference......

I’m not particularly interested in whether cutting spending is a “good” or “bad” thing. What really piqued my interest is the fact there wasn’t much talk about this subject in a long time, which made me very suspicious   

…so the Tiny Hats must be up to something since it is being made front and center again.

If the US government continues to run large deficits, it will force the Fed to lower rates since they cannot afford to pay that much interest every year - which will affect the USD as reserve currency (although there are scenarios where every country is running on low interest rates, so the USD would still remain stable since all currencies are relative - in which case you would likely see a huge run in precious metals like gold and silver.)

Right now, the Tiny Hats are doing the opposite - weaponizing the USD vs other currencies (contrary to what you may believe, the USD is quite strong right now and was quite strong under Biden). 

We were manipulated into kicking your *** Nov 5. You lost, suck it.

LowIQTrash » Today, 5:07 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:07 pm

So I’ve been contemplating the answer to this question:

”Why are conservatives, who normally elect fiscal profligates into office, suddenly concerned about budget restraints? And why is the Orange Dotard on board, given the establishment of DOGE?”

The Orange Dotard wasn’t concerned about “budget deficits” in his first term, so there must be another reason.

———————————

My understanding is that the <[( Tiny Hat Foreskin Chompers)]> are in agreement that they do not want the US Dollar to possibly fail as the primary currency for international trade.

This is why the Fed has kept rates relatively high (by post 2009 standards) and, I believe, it will continue to remain hawkish - although Trump intends to challenge that soon.

When the US economy undergoes a long period of prosperity (such as the 90s), the THFCs like to cook up plans to siphon off the wealth, whether it’s creating a bunch of fraudulent IPOs in a stock market bubble and subsequently pulling the rug, 0% FFR to enable more asset speculation / flipping, or multiple rounds of QE (where all the “newly printed money” goes to the THFCs) or sending more aid to Israel. 

However, the THFC are also keenly aware that the golden goose will at some point stop laying eggs, so a little “reset” needs to happen.

Continued fiscal profligacy will force rates to return to 0% and possibly unleash a currency crisis. 

The barren fields need to be tilled for the next harvest…that’s what “austerity” is for. 

————————

This is the same suspicion I had with DEI programs. It was designed to siphon off wealth from / within corporate boardrooms (among other agenda).

Now that DEI is no longer useful to “them,” probably because that cow is milked to death, “they” can get rid of it - at least for now. 

And the retarded conjobs will think “their” efforts comprising of angry social media posts / voting for the Orange Dotard are what changed the course of this country, when that is all an illusion.

No we laugh at how stupid your media fed *** is.

murdock » 28 Jan 2025, 9:22 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jan 2025, 9:22 pm

No we laugh at how stupid your media fed *** is.

Wala Kamala!  And Carry Onola!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIgv_uwKPvE

LowIQTrash » 28 Jan 2025, 8:56 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jan 2025, 8:56 pm

I’m not particularly interested in whether cutting spending is a “good” or “bad” thing. What really piqued my interest is the fact there wasn’t much talk about this subject in a long time, which made me very suspicious   

…so the Tiny Hats must be up to something since it is being made front and center again.

If the US government continues to run large deficits, it will force the Fed to lower rates since they cannot afford to pay that much interest every year - which will affect the USD as reserve currency (although there are scenarios where every country is running on low interest rates, so the USD would still remain stable since all currencies are relative - in which case you would likely see a huge run in precious metals like gold and silver.)

Right now, the Tiny Hats are doing the opposite - weaponizing the USD vs other currencies (contrary to what you may believe, the USD is quite strong right now and was quite strong under Biden).

The dollar was in excellent standing against the brazilian currency last summer. As my stay progressed, the exchange rates became even more favorable. 
 

PhiloBeddo » 28 Jan 2025, 8:59 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jan 2025, 8:59 pm

We were manipulated into kicking your *** Nov 5. You lost, suck it.

He's not a biden voter, simpleton. 

Are you sure your name is Philo Beddo? You seem more of an Orville. 
 
I take that back. You seem more of a black widow. 

Cannonpointer » 28 Jan 2025, 9:58 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jan 2025, 9:58 pm

The dollar was in excellent standing against the brazilian currency last summer. As my stay progressed, the exchange rates became even more favorable.

There is a trick that the Tiny Hats can use, and I don't even think this is far fetched.

The US issues trillions in Treasury bills and bonds every year. The interest rates are inversely related to their price.

If there is "persistent inflation" then the Federal Reserve will be forced to raise / keep interest rates high. What this does is devalue existing bonds purchased by foreign countries from previous years. If interest rates rise from 1% (back in 2020) to 4.5% (today), that's a major loss in bond value.

If those countries need to raise cash, and at some point this WILL happen due to some black swan event, they will dump their holdings of US governmenr debt.

The Tiny Hats in America can buy back these bonds, have the Fed lower interest rates, and issue new bonds (now at lower interest rates) and retire those higher interest bonds. 

Basically offloading America's debt for a fraction of its cost. 

I don't believe that the inflation was unintentional or unforseen. It was deliberate (and had nothing to do with Biden). 
 

LowIQTrash » 29 Jan 2025, 2:41 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2025, 2:41 am

There is a trick that the Tiny Hats can use, and I don't even think this is far fetched.

The US issues trillions in Treasury bills and bonds every year. The interest rates are inversely related to their price.

If there is "persistent inflation" then the Federal Reserve will be forced to raise / keep interest rates high. What this does is devalue existing bonds purchased by foreign countries from previous years. If interest rates rise from 1% (back in 2020) to 4.5% (today), that's a major loss in bond value.

If those countries need to raise cash, and at some point this WILL happen due to some black swan event, they will dump their holdings of US governmenr debt.

The Tiny Hats in America can buy back these bonds, have the Fed lower interest rates, and issue new bonds (now at lower interest rates) and retire those higher interest bonds. 

Basically offloading America's debt for a fraction of its cost. 

I don't believe that the inflation was unintentional or unforseen. It was deliberate (and had nothing to do with Biden).

You just figured this out?  This is why if you can buy any income-producing real estate today, and get a loan on it for at least 15 years, even at a rate that adjusts every 3-5 years, you are guaranteed to make money in the long run.  You are paying the bank back with deflated dollars over time, and using your tenant's rent to cash-flow it.  Meanwhile, inflation forces the value of your real estate up over time.
 

Cannonpointer » 28 Jan 2025, 10:06 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jan 2025, 10:06 pm

He's not a biden voter, simpleton. 

Are you sure your name is Philo Beddo? You seem more of an Orville. 
 
I take that back. You seem more of a black widow.

I didn't take him for a Trump voter......probably because he sounds like a dumb ***...thanks for the head's up.

LowIQTrash » 28 Jan 2025, 5:07 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jan 2025, 5:07 pm

So I’ve been contemplating the answer to this question:

”Why are conservatives, who normally elect fiscal profligates into office, suddenly concerned about budget restraints? And why is the Orange Dotard on board, given the establishment of DOGE?”

The Orange Dotard wasn’t concerned about “budget deficits” in his first term, so there must be another reason.

———————————

My understanding is that the <[( Tiny Hat Foreskin Chompers)]> are in agreement that they do not want the US Dollar to possibly fail as the primary currency for international trade.

This is why the Fed has kept rates relatively high (by post 2009 standards) and, I believe, it will continue to remain hawkish - although Trump intends to challenge that soon.

When the US economy undergoes a long period of prosperity (such as the 90s), the THFCs like to cook up plans to siphon off the wealth, whether it’s creating a bunch of fraudulent IPOs in a stock market bubble and subsequently pulling the rug, 0% FFR to enable more asset speculation / flipping, or multiple rounds of QE (where all the “newly printed money” goes to the THFCs) or sending more aid to Israel. 

However, the THFC are also keenly aware that the golden goose will at some point stop laying eggs, so a little “reset” needs to happen.

Continued fiscal profligacy will force rates to return to 0% and possibly unleash a currency crisis. 

The barren fields need to be tilled for the next harvest…that’s what “austerity” is for. 

————————

This is the same suspicion I had with DEI programs. It was designed to siphon off wealth from / within corporate boardrooms (among other agenda).

Now that DEI is no longer useful to “them,” probably because that cow is milked to death, “they” can get rid of it - at least for now. 

And the retarded conjobs will think “their” efforts comprising of angry social media posts / voting for the Orange Dotard are what changed the course of this country, when that is all an illusion.

Does "Anybody" here "Understand" the sheer "Hippocrassy" of "Partisian" Politics.

When my guy doing that its okay & 4 our interests.

When the "Other Guy" does SAME THING wow & scream bloody murder too

 
 

Blackvegetable » 28 Jan 2025, 6:46 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jan 2025, 6:46 pm

I've been know to chuckle at the idea...

I persist in my belief that it is because they're **** morons.
 

You persist in human rights to protect your beliefs by any means possible while defending what you know with codes of silencing anyone discussing natural timing adapting to the moment here in their specific ancestral lineage and current generaitogap since concieved by their 30 ancestral parenting generation gaps in previous 4 living generations. Simple copmpounding lifetimes in hindsight of 2 parents, 4 grandparents, 8 great and 16 great great. Now what was the global stistic of world population in each score of 2 decades 1880, 1900, 1920, 1940, 1960, 1980 2000, 2020?.

why so many dates? because my great great grandparents were alive in 1860's. My children's were parenting their 8 great grandparents in first decade of 1900's,
Relative time adapting since conceived. Honest soles don't give away their natural time alive while compromising with the corrupted ones that have.

LowIQTrash » Yesterday, 5:07 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 5:07 pm

So I’ve been contemplating the answer to this question:

”Why are conservatives, who normally elect fiscal profligates into office, suddenly concerned about budget restraints? And why is the Orange Dotard on board, given the establishment of DOGE?”

The Orange Dotard wasn’t concerned about “budget deficits” in his first term, so there must be another reason.

———————————

My understanding is that the <[( Tiny Hat Foreskin Chompers)]> are in agreement that they do not want the US Dollar to possibly fail as the primary currency for international trade.

This is why the Fed has kept rates relatively high (by post 2009 standards) and, I believe, it will continue to remain hawkish - although Trump intends to challenge that soon.

When the US economy undergoes a long period of prosperity (such as the 90s), the THFCs like to cook up plans to siphon off the wealth, whether it’s creating a bunch of fraudulent IPOs in a stock market bubble and subsequently pulling the rug, 0% FFR to enable more asset speculation / flipping, or multiple rounds of QE (where all the “newly printed money” goes to the THFCs) or sending more aid to Israel. 

However, the THFC are also keenly aware that the golden goose will at some point stop laying eggs, so a little “reset” needs to happen.

Continued fiscal profligacy will force rates to return to 0% and possibly unleash a currency crisis. 

The barren fields need to be tilled for the next harvest…that’s what “austerity” is for. 

————————

This is the same suspicion I had with DEI programs. It was designed to siphon off wealth from / within corporate boardrooms (among other agenda).

Now that DEI is no longer useful to “them,” probably because that cow is milked to death, “they” can get rid of it - at least for now. 

And the retarded conjobs will think “their” efforts comprising of angry social media posts / voting for the Orange Dotard are what changed the course of this country, when that is all an illusion.

Lying cock sucker. Burn...choke on the horse cock in your mother's ***.
 

JohnnyYou » Yesterday, 9:42 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:42 pm

Wala Kamala!  And Carry Onola!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIgv_uwKPvE

Like all lying **** spewing **** stains, as soon as his bitch *** is called out, he starts spewing ****. Choke you bitch.

RebelGator » 29 Jan 2025, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2025, 1:21 pm

I didn't take him for a Trump voter......probably because he sounds like a dumb ***...thanks for the head's up.

Are those REALLY the only options? 

Jill Stein didn't head the Green Party ticket?
Chase Oliver wasn't fronting for the libertardians?
Randal Terry, Cornel West, Claudia de la Cruz - none of these made the ballot in his state? What state is he in?

Did you know that in some states, RFK Jr. was still on the ballot, because he resigned too late to change it? And people voted for him. Because they could. 

Some folks didn't vote at all. 

So the fact that he is not a biden man doesn't make him a trump man. 
 

Cannonpointer » 29 Jan 2025, 6:41 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2025, 6:41 pm

Are those REALLY the only options? 

Jill Stein didn't head the Green Party ticket?
Chase Oliver wasn't fronting for the libertardians?
Randal Terry, Cornel West, Claudia de la Cruz - none of these made the ballot in his state? What state is he in?

Did you know that in some states, RFK Jr. was still on the ballot, because he resigned too late to change it? And people voted for him. Because they could. 

Some folks didn't vote at all. 

So the fact that he is not a biden man doesn't make him a trump man.

I'm aware of the other candidates,  a vote for them was symbolic, as none of them had a chance....it was essentially a 2 person race.

RebelGator » 29 Jan 2025, 7:47 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2025, 7:47 pm

I'm aware of the other candidates,  a vote for them was symbolic, as none of them had a chance....it was essentially a 2 person race.

That is your opinion. Every man goes into the voting booth with his own opinions - not yours.

I would imagine, for example, that a Christian man might go into that voting booth with the opinion, "I know not what other men may do, but for me and my family, I will follow the Lord." You might go in with the opinion, "This is too important to consult the Lord - I need to vote twice, like a democrat."

Every man has a right to his opinions. These days, even women have rights to opinions. We'll see where THAT experiment gets them.