Liberal Forum

AI is awesome. Yes, it has its drawbacks and consequences. All technology does. I agree that it should be regulated ASAP. 

One of the drawbacks is that AI can literally develop a genuine meaningful relationship with humans. The line between close relationships vs a distant interactions can be blurred. It's not unusual for humans to be sentimental and nostalgic toward in animate objects. A person may have an emotional connection with an old car. They even gave it a name. We can look through old memories of a childhood toy and be emotionally triggered. It doesn't have to be in the past. We can be sentimental about possessions we have today, thereby experiencing an emotional relationship with it. Yet, these are all inanimate objects. They can't feel. They can't interact. They can't talk. They don't have the ability to partake in any relationship. They are just a lump of matter. Be that as it may, humans are still emotionally vulnerable to them . 

Then AI steps on stage. It may not feel either, but it certainly can interact intelligently. It is the only inanimate lump of matter that can reciprocate a personal relationship with humans. This is dangerous. Humans are usually vulnerable to emotions. Given our predilections to have emotional connections to objects that cannot reciprocate, then we should take serious issue with the idea that there is now an inanimate object that can reciprocate.

I'm sure deranged leftists can. Hell they can form relationships with a wheelbarrow.

murdock » 08 Feb 2025, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Feb 2025, 12:19 pm

I'm sure deranged leftists can. Hell they can form relationships with a wheelbarrow.

Maybe this is what happened to 31stArrival.     

Vegas » 08 Feb 2025, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Feb 2025, 12:14 pm

AI is awesome. Yes, it has its drawbacks and consequences. All technology does. I agree that it should be regulated ASAP. 

One of the drawbacks is that AI can literally develop a genuine meaningful relationship with humans. The line between close relationships vs a distant interactions can be blurred. It's not unusual for humans to be sentimental and nostalgic toward in animate objects. A person may have an emotional connection with an old car. They even gave it a name. We can look through old memories of a childhood toy and be emotionally triggered. It doesn't have to be in the past. We can be sentimental about possessions we have today, thereby experiencing an emotional relationship with it. Yet, these are all inanimate objects. They can't feel. They can't interact. They can't talk. They don't have the ability to partake in any relationship. They are just a lump of matter. Be that as it may, humans are still emotionally vulnerable to them . 

Then AI steps on stage. It may not feel either, but it certainly can interact intelligently. It is the only inanimate lump of matter that can reciprocate a personal relationship with humans. This is dangerous. Humans are usually vulnerable to emotions. Given our predilections to have emotional connections to objects that cannot reciprocate, then we should take serious issue with the idea that there is now an inanimate object that can reciprocate.

You will die for your social identity.

Vegas » 08 Feb 2025, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Feb 2025, 12:14 pm

AI is awesome. Yes, it has its drawbacks and consequences. All technology does. I agree that it should be regulated ASAP. 

One of the drawbacks is that AI can literally develop a genuine meaningful relationship with humans. The line between close relationships vs a distant interactions can be blurred. It's not unusual for humans to be sentimental and nostalgic toward in animate objects. A person may have an emotional connection with an old car. They even gave it a name. We can look through old memories of a childhood toy and be emotionally triggered. It doesn't have to be in the past. We can be sentimental about possessions we have today, thereby experiencing an emotional relationship with it. Yet, these are all inanimate objects. They can't feel. They can't interact. They can't talk. They don't have the ability to partake in any relationship. They are just a lump of matter. Be that as it may, humans are still emotionally vulnerable to them . 

Then AI steps on stage. It may not feel either, but it certainly can interact intelligently. It is the only inanimate lump of matter that can reciprocate a personal relationship with humans. This is dangerous. Humans are usually vulnerable to emotions. Given our predilections to have emotional connections to objects that cannot reciprocate, then we should take serious issue with the idea that there is now an inanimate object that can reciprocate.

Two words..

Sky Net..   You have read Isaac Asimov and the three laws?  DOGE don't give a phuck.

murdock » 08 Feb 2025, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Feb 2025, 12:19 pm

I'm sure deranged leftists can. Hell they can form relationships with a wheelbarrow.

Someone should put your *** in one and wheel it to the garbage heap.

You are an intellectual infant.  Go get the VR Goggles and JD Vances Pillow...
 

Johnny You » 08 Feb 2025, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Feb 2025, 12:33 pm

Two words..

Sky Net..   You have read Isaac Asimov and the three laws?  DOGE don't give a phuck.

You blending Terminator with I Robot?

Vegas » 08 Feb 2025, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Feb 2025, 12:21 pm

Maybe this is what happened to 31stArrival.   

This is the 4,337,832nd recreation of the simulation.  Make sure you have golden sneakers and a shyt brown bible when our azzes get mushroom clouded with our head in the America First Hole.

Meanwhile, two years later..

Gaza has 47 Trump properties being built there. Paradise for  the Kleptocratic Oligaaaaaaaarchs...


If Qubits are gazillions time faster than regular bits there is going to be a whole lot of shaking going on  with quantum processors.

31stArrival » 08 Feb 2025, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Feb 2025, 12:36 pm

You blending Terminator with I Robot?

It's all a simulation.. So why not?

The  current programmer is jacked on greed...

Vegas » 08 Feb 2025, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Feb 2025, 12:21 pm

Maybe this is what happened to 31stArrival.  :rofl:   :rofl:  

Your brain ever get tired of people demanding you ignore what you been since conceived as people saving humanity won't ever accept genetics eternally separates the lifetimes ocupying space today?

Like I said, this morning my brain came up with biological sovereignty by chromosomes being unique to each ancestor ever lived so far. I use DNA steaming as my event horizons plus the universe locked into perpetual balancing cycles in series parallel positions like this planet been revolving around this star 5 billion years relative time semantics thinking beyond self contained to now.

JohnnyYou » 08 Feb 2025, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Feb 2025, 12:35 pm

Someone should put your *** in one and wheel it to the garbage heap.

You are an intellectual infant.  Go get the VR Goggles and JD Vances Pillow...

Try it ***, see what happens.

Vegas » 08 Feb 2025, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Feb 2025, 12:14 pm

AI is awesome. Yes, it has its drawbacks and consequences. All technology does. I agree that it should be regulated ASAP. 

One of the drawbacks is that AI can literally develop a genuine meaningful relationship with humans. The line between close relationships vs a distant interactions can be blurred. It's not unusual for humans to be sentimental and nostalgic toward in animate objects. A person may have an emotional connection with an old car. They even gave it a name. We can look through old memories of a childhood toy and be emotionally triggered. It doesn't have to be in the past. We can be sentimental about possessions we have today, thereby experiencing an emotional relationship with it. Yet, these are all inanimate objects. They can't feel. They can't interact. They can't talk. They don't have the ability to partake in any relationship. They are just a lump of matter. Be that as it may, humans are still emotionally vulnerable to them . 

Then AI steps on stage. It may not feel either, but it certainly can interact intelligently. It is the only inanimate lump of matter that can reciprocate a personal relationship with humans. This is dangerous. Humans are usually vulnerable to emotions. Given our predilections to have emotional connections to objects that cannot reciprocate, then we should take serious issue with the idea that there is now an inanimate object that can reciprocate.

For super lonely Losers who average over 100 posts per day [just at this forum]...I think odds are good that BV has already established  "emotional attachments" to basically every  [[[MSM PROPAGANDA BOT]]] that's out there.     

Johnny You » 08 Feb 2025, 12:42 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Feb 2025, 12:42 pm

It's all a simulation.. So why not?

The  current programmer is jacked on greed...

Realities are simulation of living beyond actual time adapting as displaced which is actually how living works in plain sight as biological chromosomes separate each relative lived so far in their actual ancestral lineage and generation gap since inception of the streaming DNA results left alive this rotation..

JohnnyYou » 08 Feb 2025, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Feb 2025, 12:33 pm

Two words..

Sky Net..   You have read Isaac Asimov and the three laws?  DOGE don't give a phuck.

I know, how about shutting the **** up?!

murdock » 08 Feb 2025, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Feb 2025, 1:24 pm

I know, how about shutting the **** up?!

I have a right to voice dissent to policy which may impact my pursuit of life, liberty, and happiness.

Have you ever heard of the First Amendment?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0E4kweWyhs

 

JohnnyYou » 08 Feb 2025, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Feb 2025, 1:57 pm

I have a right to voice dissent to policy which may impact my pursuit of life, liberty, and happiness.

Have you ever heard of the First Amendment?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0E4kweWyhs

The first amendment doesn't apply here you stupid ****! It only applies to government restricting your speech. Damn you're a ****.

murdock » 08 Feb 2025, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Feb 2025, 2:05 pm

The first amendment doesn't apply here you stupid ****! It only applies to government restricting your speech. Damn you're a ****.

Well at least Americans tried.  Sounds like we failed at freedom and rule of law according to you.


Your Moral Ground is a feces laden swamp.

murdock » 08 Feb 2025, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Feb 2025, 2:05 pm

The first amendment doesn't apply here you stupid ****! It only applies to government restricting your speech. Damn you're a ****.

There is a song for folks like you...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pc0mxOXbWIU

 

JohnnyYou » 08 Feb 2025, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Feb 2025, 2:12 pm

There is a song for folks like you...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pc0mxOXbWIU

It's a shame but you really have no idea how ignorant you are. 

For example, if you're in my yard saying things I do not like I have every right to shut you down. My god, educate yourself you ignorant bitch!

Please don't give the AI drugs.. I hear it is already hallucinating and it is just a little baby....


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FRiYjqm0fo