**** you.31stArrival » Yesterday, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑ You'll never have the opportunity because you keep screwing yourself 24/7 and being the kind sole I am I give you the natural information to stop, and you won't.
the beauty of cyberspace tech is I never have to get near you, ever. I don't have to chase anyone around living in series parallel positions so far. I only have to be honest about how chromosomes exist as inhabting space same way I have done since conceived regardless their separate ancestral lineage and generation gap reached after birth.
31stArrival » Yesterday, 8:03 am » wrote: ↑ And your soul is filled with collusion to reasonable doubt.
Like your avatar of pushing up daisies. Your social identity is debunked and all you have left is the ancestral position that brought you into existence as conceived by your ancestry. Can't believe something possible doesn't change anything about how you exist in plain sight other than explain your behavior after birth won't accept all you been since conceived.murdock » Today, 4:03 am » wrote: ↑ You're *** is filled with horse jizz spilled from your mom's ***.
runs in which direction? Away from what you been since conceived or who you became after birth? One is physically here an the other philosophically anything else than all you been.Johnny You » Today, 1:36 am » wrote: ↑ There is no doubt without consciousness. It's a wonderful mechanism for survival.
It doesn't matter if we are the slowest Gazelle or the fastest Lion, everyone runs.
he's actually on a limited budget and can only afford low tech...plus, he's already living his fantasy in an old alias...*GHETTOBLASTER » 08 Feb 2025, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑ For super lonely Losers who average over 100 posts per day [just at this forum]...I think odds are good that BV has already established "emotional attachments" to basically every [[[MSM PROPAGANDA BOT]]] that's out there.
you're asking a mentally midgeted libtardo to educate themselves?murdock » 08 Feb 2025, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑ It's a shame but you really have no idea how ignorant you are.
For example, if you're in my yard saying things I do not like I have every right to shut you down. My god, educate yourself you ignorant bitch!
so now she was a dyke?JohnnyYou » 08 Feb 2025, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑ so can you brief on if the female pilot on the training mission in DC that took AA 5432 out wan't pissed Hegseth was kicking dykes out of the helicopter squad?
Yeah, and they've been programmed to avoid your hands, lips and tongue...they're also working on tech that'll shoot lasers at your eyes if you even look causing permanent eyesight loss...
short for Alesha...murdock » Yesterday, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑ I doubt that woman is named AL. No one one with tits like that is named AL. Anyone naming her AL would be outcast!
Ruthlessness is relentless from a mob mentality corrupting each great great grandhild added to life. The inherent problem of a village raising a family's child..
People claim to have formed emotional bonds with inanimate objects like rubber balloons. Never underestimate the power of a human to be a completely incapable, non-functioning, self-destructive idiot.Vegas » 08 Feb 2025, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑ AI is awesome. Yes, it has its drawbacks and consequences. All technology does. I agree that it should be regulated ASAP.
One of the drawbacks is that AI can literally develop a genuine meaningful relationship with humans. The line between close relationships vs a distant interactions can be blurred. It's not unusual for humans to be sentimental and nostalgic toward in animate objects. A person may have an emotional connection with an old car. They even gave it a name. We can look through old memories of a childhood toy and be emotionally triggered. It doesn't have to be in the past. We can be sentimental about possessions we have today, thereby experiencing an emotional relationship with it. Yet, these are all inanimate objects. They can't feel. They can't interact. They can't talk. They don't have the ability to partake in any relationship. They are just a lump of matter. Be that as it may, humans are still emotionally vulnerable to them .
Then AI steps on stage. It may not feel either, but it certainly can interact intelligently. It is the only inanimate lump of matter that can reciprocate a personal relationship with humans. This is dangerous. Humans are usually vulnerable to emotions. Given our predilections to have emotional connections to objects that cannot reciprocate, then we should take serious issue with the idea that there is now an inanimate object that can reciprocate.