*Huey » 27 Feb 2025, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑ *Huey » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
15 minutes ago
Sorry, not taking demands from non reading Dishonest Pricks. Anyway, the exemption you are against is no longer active.
Blackvegetable » 27 Feb 2025, 1:35 pm » wrote: ↑ so it would be fair to say that you never had a point....
Your link included 2 other outbreaks not involving immigrants.*Huey » 27 Feb 2025, 1:58 pm » wrote: ↑ Sure. I accept the fact that I have to explain the citation to you as proof that you don't read well, The Chicago outbreak was in Mar of 2024 and started in a migrant center. Additionally, at that time, the exemption was in place. So kids were exposed to it who went to school. Additionally, we allow migrants to come in unvaccinated and I never hear a peep out of the likes of you.
Blackvegetable » 27 Feb 2025, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Your link included 2 other outbreaks not involving immigrants.
What qualified a child for the exemption?
Demonstrate that you understand what you insist I can't read.
You've made no point..*Huey » 27 Feb 2025, 4:00 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm good. I made my point. You have been told I am not answering demands from a Dishonest Prick who doesn't answer questions.
Blackvegetable » 27 Feb 2025, 4:16 pm » wrote: ↑ You've made no point..
You rebleated something false you were told by The Five. There was no exemption for children of immigrants.
Had you read your citation you might have known better...
https://youtu.be/t_wbyv1TgIQ?si=M627tdk2mT4DhvFJ*Beekeeper » 27 Feb 2025, 6:58 pm » wrote: ↑ I kicked YOUR *** with the point I MADE about Clinton's CDC declaring that measles were no longer present in the UNITED STATES!!
AND because of that, MANY STATES no longer required the measles vax be administered to school age children.
Sucks, huh?? And PARENTS also voluntarily stopped requesting them BECAUSE DOCTORS NO LONGER RECOMMENDED THEM EITHER!!
So how's that POINT I just SHOVED UP THAT FILTHY *** OF YOURS?? You know, that CUM FILLED ONE YOU OWN!!
Blackvegetable » 26 Feb 2025, 5:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Texas child is first confirmed death in growing measles outbreakThe unvaccinated school-age child is the first confirmed fatality in Texas’s worst measles outbreak in three decades.
LUBBOCK, Texas — A child has died of measles here , the first confirmed fatality in Texas’s worst outbreak of the disease in three decades, state health officials said Wednesday.
The unvaccinated school-age child was hospitalized last week, according to the Texas Department of State Health Services. The death is the first known U.S. measles fatality since 2015.
Officials have reported 124 cases in Texas, mostly in west Texas, since late January, and nine cases in a neighboring New Mexico county. Nearly 80 percent are children, who are more susceptible to the vaccine-preventable disease.
https://youtu.be/lZRNjAJdPaI?si=Tsu8b0iVQzzOt3Jg
Blackvegetable » 27 Feb 2025, 4:16 pm » wrote: ↑ You've made no point..
You rebleated something false you were told by The Five. There was no exemption for children of immigrants.
Had you read your citation you might have known better...
@ROG62*Beekeeper » 28 Feb 2025, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑ Please. You're making a total FOOL out of yourself.
Second thought, it's comical as hell watching you flail like you do in a vapid attempt to be relevant, which you never will be in case you didn't know.
It's WHY only THIS is what you are
Are these your words?*Huey » 28 Feb 2025, 6:10 am » wrote: ↑ Please tell us what the Five specifically said about this and on which episode. You don’t watch the Five, Dishonest Prick, and have no clue what they discuss unless told by your influencer.
Arms Length, you ain’t ****. Had to throw that in….
I'm good. I made my point. You have been told I am not answering demands from a Dishonest Prick who doesn't answer questions.
That's another runner....*Huey » 28 Feb 2025, 7:54 am » wrote: ↑ That’s a diversion.
with a link and a date tell us what the five panel said about our discussion, DP.

No it didn't, lying little ****..*Huey » 28 Feb 2025, 8:02 am » wrote: ↑ No, Dishonest Prick. This came first:
Please tell us what the Five specifically said about this and on which episode. You don’t watch the Five, Dishonest Prick, and have no clue what they discuss unless told by your influencer.
Arms Length, you ain’t ****. Had to throw that in….
Looks like, as usual, you are the runner, ArmsLength. Keep running.....
Today at 0610:

Child Groomer, Sexual PredatorPosts: 35,779Contact:
Are these your words?*Huey » Today, 6:10 am » wrote: ↑
Today, 6:10 am
Please tell us what the Five specifically said about this and on which episode. You don’t watch the Five, Dishonest Prick, and have no clue what they discuss unless told by your influencer.
Arms Length, you ain’t ****. Had to throw that in….
I'm good. I made my point. You have been told I am not answering demands from a Dishonest Prick who doesn't answer questions.
https://i.postimg.cc/DfXWRQX9/People-****-stupid.jpg