Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
What do you think would be the worst consequence for the U.S. if it left NATO?
What do you think would be the worst consequence for the U.S. if it left NATO?
By Vegas
Yesterday 3:58 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
7 posts • Page 1 of 1
Musk and Trump both are not big fans of NATO. However, it's good to weigh the pros/cons.
Pros of Leaving NATO
1. Increased Security Threats – Without NATO, the U.S. could face greater security risks, as adversaries like Russia and China may feel emboldened to challenge Western interests.
2. Economic and Trade Consequences – NATO fosters economic stability and strong trade relationships. A U.S. exit could strain diplomatic ties and impact defense industry profits.
Pros of Leaving NATO
- Reduced Financial Burden – The U.S. contributes the largest share to NATO’s budget, and leaving would free up billions of dollars for domestic priorities.
- Avoiding Entanglements – NATO’s collective defense policy (Article 5) could drag the U.S. into conflicts that may not directly serve its interests.
1. Increased Security Threats – Without NATO, the U.S. could face greater security risks, as adversaries like Russia and China may feel emboldened to challenge Western interests.
2. Economic and Trade Consequences – NATO fosters economic stability and strong trade relationships. A U.S. exit could strain diplomatic ties and impact defense industry profits.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
Yesterday 4:15 pm
The US contributes 68% of NATO's defense. That is 860 billion dollars. That is a lot of money saved.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
Yesterday 4:43 pm
Your short sighted intellect really doesn't understand long term evolving in plain sight with logistics without a tomorrow possible.Vegas » 48 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Musk and Trump both are not big fans of NATO. However, it's good to weigh the pros/cons.
Pros of Leaving NATOCons of Leaving NATO
- Reduced Financial Burden – The U.S. contributes the largest share to NATO’s budget, and leaving would free up billions of dollars for domestic priorities.
- Avoiding Entanglements – NATO’s collective defense policy (Article 5) could drag the U.S. into conflicts that may not directly serve its interests.
1. Increased Security Threats – Without NATO, the U.S. could face greater security risks, as adversaries like Russia and China may feel emboldened to challenge Western interests.
2. Economic and Trade Consequences – NATO fosters economic stability and strong trade relationships. A U.S. exit could strain diplomatic ties and impact defense industry profits.
Yesterday 5:13 pm
Yesterday 5:13 pm
Yesterday 5:15 pm
31stArrival » 33 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Your short sighted intellect really doesn't understand long term evolving in plain sight with logistics without a tomorrow possible.
**** you ya goddamn babbling idiot.
Yesterday 5:15 pm
Fake news.
7 posts • Page 1 of 1
Who is online
In total there are 4636 users online :: 3 registered, 16 bots, and 4617 guests
Bots: facebookexternalhit, proximic, YandexBot, LCC, Custo, CriteoBot, ADmantX, Mediapartners-Google, DuckDuckBot, semantic-visions.com, app.hypefactors.com, linkfluence.com, bingbot, Googlebot, curl/7, oBot