Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Who filmed the moon landing? Neil Armstrong first steps?
Who filmed the moon landing? Neil Armstrong first steps?
By Sumela
5 Mar 2025 10:49 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
5 Mar 2025 10:49 am
5 Mar 2025 11:13 am
The moon landing was filmed using cameras developed by RCA and Westinghouse, with the Westinghouse black and white camera capturing Neil Armstrong's first steps on the lunar surface. The footage was transmitted back to Earth and broadcast to millions of viewers worldwide.
I see no reason to doubt that explanation.
I toured the Space Museum while stationed at Redstone Arsenal in 1975.
They had a few of the space capsules on display.
They also had the Saturn V engine...
What struck me was how "ordinary" the space capsules looked as far as construction methods, materials and devices were concerned.
If you are familiar with what MILSPEC aeronautical equipment looks like..those early space capsules had no surprises, outside of how minimalistic they were.
5 Mar 2025 11:14 am
But who filmed it*GHETTOBLASTER » 05 Mar 2025, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑ The moon landing was filmed using cameras developed by RCA and Westinghouse, with the Westinghouse black and white camera capturing Neil Armstrong's first steps on the lunar surface. The footage was transmitted back to Earth and broadcast to millions of viewers worldwide.
Smithsonian Institution
National Archives
I see no reason to doubt that explanation.
I toured the Space Museum while stationed at Redstone Arsenal in 1975.
They had a few of the space capsules on display.
They also had the Saturn V engine...
What struck me was how "ordinary" the space capsules looked as far as construction methods, materials and devices were concerned.
If you are familiar with what MILSPEC aeronautical equipment looks like..those early space capsules had no surprises, outside of how minimalistic they were.
5 Mar 2025 11:22 am
Well maybe you've already read this explanation but have found details that don't add up...? https://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/spac ... oonlanding
5 Mar 2025 11:28 am
Sir, the OP was just for fun. Its just a comedy skit.*GHETTOBLASTER » 05 Mar 2025, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Well maybe you've already read this explanation but have found details that don't add up...? https://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/spac ... oonlanding
5 Mar 2025 11:31 am
oooops.......
!!The link didn't seem to work and so I thought you were serious.
5 Mar 2025 11:38 am
True.*GHETTOBLASTER » 05 Mar 2025, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑ The moon landing was filmed using cameras developed by RCA and Westinghouse, with the Westinghouse black and white camera capturing Neil Armstrong's first steps on the lunar surface. The footage was transmitted back to Earth and broadcast to millions of viewers worldwide.
I see no reason to doubt that explanation.
I toured the Space Museum while stationed at Redstone Arsenal in 1975.
They had a few of the space capsules on display.
They also had the Saturn V engine...
What struck me was how "ordinary" the space capsules looked as far as construction methods, materials and devices were concerned.
If you are familiar with what MILSPEC aeronautical equipment looks like..those early space capsules had no surprises, outside of how minimalistic they were.
It had some kind of autonomous arm that was able to put the camera out there.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
5 Mar 2025 11:38 am
'Smello posts with a lot of tongue and ***-cheek.*GHETTOBLASTER » 05 Mar 2025, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑ oooops.......ops: !!
The link didn't seem to work and so I thought you were serious.
5 Mar 2025 11:40 am
*GHETTOBLASTER » 05 Mar 2025, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑ oooops.......
The link didn't seem to work and so I thought you were serious.
No worries my man - work now?https://x.com/i/status/1897230756763582753
5 Mar 2025 12:36 pm
The moon landing has duped more people than biden's "win" in 2020. NASA says we have never left earth's low orbit. Russia states to this day that no one can get through the Van Allen Belts. Simple question...Why don't we have mining colonies on the moon?
The moon is rich in metals and minerals. Valuable resources that can be found on the moon include:
Helium-3,
Platinum group metals and rare-earth metals, which are tremendously valuable on Earth.
Basalt, iron, quartz, silicon, and other common minerals that can be turned into buildings, windows, stoneware, solar panels, and more.
Rare earth elements such as uranium and thorium, as well as other useful materials that we're not aware of today.
The largest single telescope in the southern hemisphere, SALT, can detect a single candle flame on the surface of the moon12.
But, But, But...we can't see anything else.
The moon is rich in metals and minerals. Valuable resources that can be found on the moon include:
Helium-3,
Platinum group metals and rare-earth metals, which are tremendously valuable on Earth.
Basalt, iron, quartz, silicon, and other common minerals that can be turned into buildings, windows, stoneware, solar panels, and more.
Rare earth elements such as uranium and thorium, as well as other useful materials that we're not aware of today.
The largest single telescope in the southern hemisphere, SALT, can detect a single candle flame on the surface of the moon12.
But, But, But...we can't see anything else.
5 Mar 2025 12:37 pm
Hollywood...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
5 Mar 2025 12:40 pm
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
5 Mar 2025 1:02 pm
Nasa says we don't have the technology to go "back" to the moon
How We Lost The Ability To Travel To The Moon
Robert Frost, Instructor and Flight Controller at NASA , on Quora.
The answer is that they are complex devices. A launch vehicle and spacecraft destined to go to the moon is much more complex and operates at the edge of the envelope where there is little tolerance for imprecision and error.
Operating a space mission involves reams of paper in the forms of flight rules and operational procedures. Those rules and procedures are drafted over thousands of hours of test and simulations. A change in the vehicle can send ripples of changes through those documents.
The Saturn V rocket had over three million parts. The command and service modules and lunar module were composed of millions of additional parts. An individual person cannot contemplate the scale of detail needed to assemble and operate those vehicles. So, when the Apollo program ended, the factories that assembled those vehicles were re-tasked or shut down. The jigs were disassembled. The molds were destroyed. The technicians, engineers, scientists, and flight controllers moved onto other jobs. Over time, some of the materials used became obsolete.
Moon landing tapes got erased, NASA admits |
Reuters..NASA lost moon footage, but Hollywood restores it (Update) - Phys.org
The GREATEST event in History.....And we destroyed/lost it all....
How We Lost The Ability To Travel To The Moon
Robert Frost, Instructor and Flight Controller at NASA , on Quora.
The answer is that they are complex devices. A launch vehicle and spacecraft destined to go to the moon is much more complex and operates at the edge of the envelope where there is little tolerance for imprecision and error.
Operating a space mission involves reams of paper in the forms of flight rules and operational procedures. Those rules and procedures are drafted over thousands of hours of test and simulations. A change in the vehicle can send ripples of changes through those documents.
The Saturn V rocket had over three million parts. The command and service modules and lunar module were composed of millions of additional parts. An individual person cannot contemplate the scale of detail needed to assemble and operate those vehicles. So, when the Apollo program ended, the factories that assembled those vehicles were re-tasked or shut down. The jigs were disassembled. The molds were destroyed. The technicians, engineers, scientists, and flight controllers moved onto other jobs. Over time, some of the materials used became obsolete.
Moon landing tapes got erased, NASA admits |
Reuters..NASA lost moon footage, but Hollywood restores it (Update) - Phys.org
The GREATEST event in History.....And we destroyed/lost it all....
5 Mar 2025 1:35 pm
5 Mar 2025 1:47 pm
Another "Pootin Sniffer" conspiracy thread...two dickheads....BV and Sumela the dickhead both constantly pushing conspiracy threads...
Who filmed the moon landing?
The Man in the moon?.....or is the answer the man in a dress?
Pootin Sniffers want to know
Who filmed the moon landing?
The Man in the moon?.....or is the answer the man in a dress?
Pootin Sniffers want to know
5 Mar 2025 1:48 pm
I toured the Kennedy Space Center and the Smithsonian exhibits. I had the exact same impression you did. Much of it looked like old aeronautic equipment. Lots of removable panels with knobs and toggle switches. Cramped and uncomfortable - IIRC, most of the early astronauts were all under 6 feet.*GHETTOBLASTER » 05 Mar 2025, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑ The moon landing was filmed using cameras developed by RCA and Westinghouse, with the Westinghouse black and white camera capturing Neil Armstrong's first steps on the lunar surface. The footage was transmitted back to Earth and broadcast to millions of viewers worldwide.
I see no reason to doubt that explanation.
I toured the Space Museum while stationed at Redstone Arsenal in 1975.
They had a few of the space capsules on display.
They also had the Saturn V engine...
What struck me was how "ordinary" the space capsules looked as far as construction methods, materials and devices were concerned.
If you are familiar with what MILSPEC aeronautical equipment looks like..those early space capsules had no surprises, outside of how minimalistic they were.
5 Mar 2025 1:52 pm
Lighten up Francisnefarious101 » 05 Mar 2025, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Another "Pootin Sniffer" conspiracy thread...two dickheads....BV and Sumela the dickhead both constantly pushing conspiracy threads...
Who filmed the moon landing?
The Man in the moon?.....or is the answer the man in a dress?
Pootin Sniffers want to know
It was a joke
5 Mar 2025 1:57 pm
Sound like more a bitter old woman than anything else
5 Mar 2025 2:08 pm
Lil Neffy is having a heavy flow this month....
5 Mar 2025 2:11 pm
All of the copper wiring carries a lot of weight too.Skans » 05 Mar 2025, 2:48 pm » wrote: ↑ I toured the Kennedy Space Center and the Smithsonian exhibits. I had the exact same impression you did. Much of it looked like old aeronautic equipment. Lots of removable panels with knobs and toggle switches. Cramped and uncomfortable - IIRC, most of the early astronauts were all under 6 feet.
There has to be a certain amount of redundancy..so plan on added weight with more wiring and electronic gizmos for that too.
As I type this it makes me wonder of they used aluminum cable anywhere to save weight...?
At White Sands Missile Range was where they did the destructive "Torture Chamber" testing of this sort of electro mechanical equipment before it got the Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval..
A big source of trouble early in the Jet / Rocket Age was the over use of soldered connections. Soldered copper strands tend to "work harden" due to vibration and break.
This is what led to the use of solderless "crimp" style connectors called "Cannon Plugs" . The male and female connectors are gold plated brass.
Reliability / survivability / maintainability testing was a huge success and this technology trickled back into commercial aviation.
Who is online
In total there are 5980 users online :: 4 registered, 15 bots, and 5961 guests
Bots: MicroMessenger, Mediatoolkitbot, DuckDuckBot, Bolt, proximic, YandexBot, Baidu, ADmantX, Applebot, curl/7, facebookexternalhit, bingbot, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot, CriteoBot