So why did Grifty trot out a cancer patient? In their heedless quest to chainsaw the federal budget, the world’s most powerful person and the richest man on Earth managed to cut a program that had cost nothing at all—while developing more than 60 drugs for children with cancer and rare, life-threatening diseases.“This program has not cost taxpayers a dime,” notes Nancy Goodman, who conceived and championed the Give Kids A Chance Act, which passed Congress in 2011 and now needs renewal.I think you are a heartless **** bastard because you support the dems unable to stand and clap for a 13 year old with brain cancer who was given 5 months to live in 2018 and all he wanted to do was be a cop. Trump had his make a wish moment and made the kid an hoary SS officer. No dem stood and clapped. YOU supported this
Great catch...!RebelGator » 06 Mar 2025, 7:50 am » wrote: ↑ Your post source claims the program didn't cost the tax-payers a dime......then you went on to bitch about how Musk has cut the funding for the bill. Sounds like someone is lying, when you get your facts straight, you may present yourself here again....do you understand, I'll be watching.
Yep, he needs to stick with lifting heavy weights with his pinky finger.
He believes this.Blackvegetable » 06 Mar 2025, 7:43 am » wrote: ↑
managed to cut a program that had cost nothing at all—while developing more than 60 drugs for children with cancer and rare, life-threatening diseases.“This program has not cost taxpayers a dime,” notes Nancy Goodman, who conceived and championed the Give Kids A Chance Act, which passed Congress in 2011 and now needs renewal.
Hole, focus.HarperLee » 06 Mar 2025, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑ "which would lead to layoffs..."
Odd..
When the pipeline was shut down I didn't hear any Democrats care about layoffs.
And when Clinton bragged about cutting 337,000 government jobs I don't remember any resistance...
Moran, anyone cures cancer catches a bullet. No one is trying. TREATING cancer is far more lucrative.Blackvegetable » 06 Mar 2025, 8:59 am » wrote: ↑ Hole, focus.
You started yapping about kids with cancer...
There's more to it than pinning a tin star on one...
Irony deficient dick sucker believes this claptrap. ^Blackvegetable » 06 Mar 2025, 7:43 am » wrote: ↑
managed to cut a program that had cost nothing at all—while developing more than 60 drugs for children with cancer and rare, life-threatening diseases.
Irony deficient dick sucker believes this claptrap. ^Blackvegetable » 06 Mar 2025, 7:43 am » wrote: ↑
managed to cut a program that had cost nothing at all—while developing more than 60 drugs for children with cancer and rare, life-threatening diseases.
Irony deficient dick sucker believes this claptrap. ^Blackvegetable » 06 Mar 2025, 7:43 am » wrote: ↑
managed to cut a program that had cost nothing at all—while developing more than 60 drugs for children with cancer and rare, life-threatening diseases.
There is no free stuff - but this slack jawed moran belives what he posted. He is THAT **** stupid.RebelGator » 06 Mar 2025, 7:50 am » wrote: ↑ Your post source claims the program didn't cost the tax-payers a dime......then you went on to bitch about how Musk has cut the funding for the bill. Sounds like someone is lying, when you get your facts straight, you may present yourself here again....do you understand, I'll be watching.
nefarious101 » 06 Mar 2025, 8:02 am » wrote: ↑ CHA-CHING....TRUMP scores one hell of a trigger on the Dickhead.
you ok dickhead?.....looks like you stoked out on that one
HarperLee » 06 Mar 2025, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑ Are you that upset over a 13 year old black boy having a shining moment.??
Yep
You are
Tell us..
Were the Democrats this cruel...
Or were they just being racists?
The queer believes in free stuff. 60 life saving drugs at no cost.
well, as @RebelGator called him out on, it's an "either / or" situation...either they're a for profit organization that is doing it well, or it's costing us a boatload...Cannonpointer » 06 Mar 2025, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑ Irony deficient dick sucker believes this claptrap. ^
FWEE STUFF! THE OWANGE MAN FWEW AWAY OUW FWEE STUFF!
Guaranteed he saw red after skimming the headline and never read further...Cannonpointer » 06 Mar 2025, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑ The irony deficient dick sucker beevee believes in free stuff.
FWEE STUFF! THE OWANGE MAN FWEW AWAY OUW FWEE STUFF!
He has no concept -no adult thoughts. There's a program, you see. It developed SIXTY FREE DRUG FOR LITTLE KIDS! No, really.
No, REALLY!
STOP LAUGHING! THIS HAPPENED!
THE OWANGE MAN FWEW AWAY OUW FWEE STUFF!
I want you to really, really think about that statement. I mean REALLY - not a once over. Do a deep mental dive on that statement, and ask yourself if you should care - and if so, why?Mrkelly » 06 Mar 2025, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑
However, those savings come at a steep cost for the pediatric cancer research community.
Says the cretinous moran who insists there's free stuff in the federal budget.Blackvegetable » 06 Mar 2025, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑ These morons would be so conflicted were they possessed of any self awareness...
I took your adviceCannonpointer » 06 Mar 2025, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑ I want you to really, really think about that statement. I mean REALLY - not a once over. Do a deep mental dive on that statement, and ask yourself if you should care - and if so, why?
Observe your assumptions in arriving at your conclusion, and question them against a hundred years of evidence.
We have a medical research establishment so incredibly powerful that it can develop not one, but FOUR patented vaccines for a novel corona virus in a SINGLE YEAR. Clearly, such a prodigious set of institutions could have cured cancer since 1913, when the american cancer society (and the creature form jekyll island) was born into our midst.
Ask yourself - in your adult voice - what would happen to anyone who cured cancer. And ask yourself if anyone from the "pediatric cancer research community" is sucking your dick on the regular, that you should give a ****. Because what they AIN'T **** DOING is curing pediatric cancer.