R: Slack Jawed Morans...

User avatar
By Blackvegetable
Today 6:43 am in Peanut Gallery
11 posts • Page 1 of 1
User avatar
Blackvegetable
Today 6:43 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
36,268 posts
How **** stupid would you have to be to fall for Grifty's "Cancer child" moment?

Mango Moron appoints a fellow moron to head HHS, and invites Elon and his Elonjugend to savage the NIH..

Then he trots out some sick kid and deputizes him.

Predictably, **** toadies, frothing at the FOXaganda, bite down on the stinkbait.

Imagine being this **** stupid in real life...
I think you are a heartless **** bastard because you support the dems unable to stand and clap for a 13 year old with brain cancer who was given 5 months to live in 2018 and all he wanted to do was be a cop. Trump had his make a wish moment and made the kid an hoary SS officer. No dem stood and clapped. YOU supported this
So why did Grifty trot out a cancer patient? In their heedless quest to chainsaw the federal budget, the world’s most powerful person and the richest man on Earth managed to cut a program that had cost nothing at all—while developing more than 60 drugs for children with cancer and rare, life-threatening diseases.“This program has not cost taxpayers a dime,” notes Nancy Goodman, who conceived and championed the Give Kids A Chance Act, which passed Congress in 2011 and now needs renewal.

The year-long measure had been a great success when it needed to be reauthorized in December. The legislation to renew it was then bundled in with numerous health-care provisions as part of a huge Continuing Resolution meant to fund the government from December 2024 to March 2025.
 Musk, who has been tasked by President Donald Trump with gutting the federal government, took note that the entire resolution was 1,547 pages. He exulted in Latin on X when it was cut at his insistent urging to a mere 116 pages. “VOX POPULI! VOX DEI!” (The voice of the people [is] the voice of God!)



https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-awkward-truth-about-trump-musk-and-kids-with-cancer/?via=newsletter&source=DDMorning&user_emailA=747e2c47e25e88dd883ee1a00fac3b7b&user_emailB=6c501e8b62ed5b45ef9e02ca49deffe8dd47ba958fb41edb9dcab8991a363872&utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=250306-am-digest&utm_term=F%20List%20Daily%20Beast%20Newsletter%20AM



**** scumbags.
User avatar
Cannonpointer
Today 7:58 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
35,994 posts
Blackvegetable » Today, 7:43 am » wrote:
managed to cut a program that had cost nothing at all—while developing more than 60 drugs for children with cancer and rare, life-threatening diseases.“This program has not cost taxpayers a dime,” notes Nancy Goodman, who conceived and championed the Give Kids A Chance Act, which passed Congress in 2011 and now needs renewal.
He believes this. 

The irony is not intentional - this *** believes that there is a federal program that doesn't have any costs that developed more than 60 drugs.

But then, he believed that companies WHICH CANNOT DEVELOPE A VACCINE FOR HIV after nearly 50 years could produce four of them for a novel corona virus in a single year - and that's just in the U.S. alone. 
 
 
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.

Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.


If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Blackvegetable
Today 7:59 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
36,297 posts
HarperLee » 34 minutes ago » wrote: "which would lead to layoffs..."

Odd..
When the pipeline was shut down I didn't hear any Democrats care about layoffs.

And when Clinton bragged about cutting 337,000 government jobs I don't remember any resistance...
Hole, focus.

You started yapping about kids with cancer...

There's more to it than pinning a tin star on one...
 
User avatar
Cannonpointer
Today 8:00 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
35,994 posts
Blackvegetable » 16 minutes ago » wrote: Hole, focus.

You started yapping about kids with cancer...

There's more to it than pinning a tin star on one...
Moran, anyone cures cancer catches a bullet. No one is trying. TREATING cancer is far more lucrative. 
 
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.

Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.


If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
Today 8:02 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
35,994 posts
Blackvegetable » Today, 7:43 am » wrote:
 managed to cut a program that had cost nothing at all—while developing more than 60 drugs for children with cancer and rare, life-threatening diseases.
Irony deficient dick sucker believes this claptrap. ^ 

FWEE STUFF! THE OWANGE MAN FWEW AWAY OUW FWEE STUFF! 

 
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.

Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.


If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
ROG62
Today 8:17 am
User avatar
      
19,284 posts
Cannonpointer » 11 minutes ago » wrote: The irony deficient dick sucker beevee believes in free stuff.

FWEE STUFF! THE OWANGE MAN FWEW AWAY OUW FWEE STUFF! 

He has no concept -no adult thoughts. There's a program, you see. It developed SIXTY FREE DRUG FOR LITTLE KIDS! No, really.

No, REALLY! 

STOP LAUGHING! THIS HAPPENED! 

THE OWANGE MAN FWEW AWAY OUW FWEE STUFF!
Guaranteed he saw red after skimming the headline and never read further...
 
Image “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." brown's unheeded words of wisdom :rofl:
User avatar
Cannonpointer
Today 8:17 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
35,996 posts
Mrkelly » 49 minutes ago » wrote:
However, those savings come at a steep cost for the pediatric cancer research community. 
I want you to really, really think about that statement. I mean REALLY - not a once over. Do a deep mental dive on that statement, and ask yourself if you should care - and if so, why?

Observe your assumptions in arriving at your conclusion, and question them against a hundred years of evidence. 

We have a medical research establishment so incredibly powerful that it can develop not one, but FOUR patented vaccines for a novel corona virus in a SINGLE YEAR. Clearly, such a prodigious set of institutions could have cured cancer since 1913, when the american cancer society (and the creature form jekyll island) was born into our midst. 

Ask yourself - in your adult voice - what would happen to anyone who cured cancer. And ask yourself if anyone from the "pediatric cancer research community" is sucking your dick on the regular, that you should give a ****. Because what they AIN'T **** DOING is curing pediatric cancer.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.

Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.


If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Mrkelly
Today 8:26 am
User avatar
      
8,280 posts
Cannonpointer » 13 minutes ago » wrote: I want you to really, really think about that statement. I mean REALLY - not a once over. Do a deep mental dive on that statement, and ask yourself if you should care - and if so, why?

Observe your assumptions in arriving at your conclusion, and question them against a hundred years of evidence. 

We have a medical research establishment so incredibly powerful that it can develop not one, but FOUR patented vaccines for a novel corona virus in a SINGLE YEAR. Clearly, such a prodigious set of institutions could have cured cancer since 1913, when the american cancer society (and the creature form jekyll island) was born into our midst. 

Ask yourself - in your adult voice - what would happen to anyone who cured cancer. And ask yourself if anyone from the "pediatric cancer research community" is sucking your dick on the regular, that you should give a ****. Because what they AIN'T **** DOING is curing pediatric cancer.
I took your advice 

and you are right

**** um

it can’t be fixed

out with the bath water
Image
User avatar
Cannonpointer
Today 8:30 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
35,997 posts
Mrkelly » 4 minutes ago » wrote: I took your advice 

and you are right

**** um

it can’t be fixed

out with the bath water
There isn't a baby. If there was a baby, we'd have cured cancer. 

That *** PG'd us, by the way. He is really protective of this particular lie. 
 
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not your friend

An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.

Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.


If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Mrkelly
Today 8:38 am
User avatar
      
8,281 posts
Cannonpointer » 11 minutes ago » wrote: There isn't a baby. If there was a baby, we'd have cured cancer. 

That *** PG'd us, by the way. He is really protective of this particular lie.
sadly, their are a lot of babies 

but few researchers give a damn for anything but money

the bleeding heart liberal in me wants to find the ones that do give a damn

and fund them

it could be done …. But

greed

Oh … and politicians 

 
Image
11 posts • Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there are 7224 users online :: 21 registered, 17 bots, and 7186 guests
Bots: DuckDuckBot, DuckDuckGo, Applebot, LCC, CriteoBot, app.hypefactors.com, ADmantX, facebookexternalhit, proximic, Mediapartners-Google, semantic-visions.com, linkfluence.com, YandexBot, oBot, bingbot, Googlebot, curl/7
Updated 1 minute ago
© 2012-2025 Liberal Forum