Liberal Forum

EDC4ALL! » 19 Nov 2025, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Nov 2025, 3:32 pm

if they are doing "ILLEGAL" things, then............****!

“ ILEGAL”  because they have the nerve to talk about Israel   

think about it   


 

jerra b » 19 Nov 2025, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Nov 2025, 2:11 pm

but  trump says he knew nothink, nothink


(trying to imitate sgt schulz)

Thinking is the current actions of a single brain navigating space living forward per heart beating next, now. People debating ideas all the time don't navigate space equally living one at a time factually here.

Mrkelly » 28 Apr 2025, 8:08 am » wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2025, 8:08 am

 Suckers

Kansas City, MissouriCNN — Donald Trump on Saturday called for protesters who demonstrate at his rallies to be arrested by police.“I hope they arrest these people because they’re really violating all of us,” Trump said at a rally here during which dozens of protesters were ejected from the venue by police. “They deserve to be arrested.”During one of more than a dozen interruptions, Trump asked police to arrest the demonstrators, saying he would “file whatever charges you want.”But Trump’s call went beyond the protesters in this Kansas City theater, with the Republican front-runner suggesting he would like to institute a practice of arresting protesters who disrupt his rallies.“Once that’s starts happening, we’re not going to have any more protesters, folks,” Trump said.Trump’s remark is not the first time he has called for a tightening of First Amendment protections. Protests are covered as a fundamental exercise of free speech.Trump also said late last month that he wants to “open up libel laws” so he can sue media publications that write negative and, in his view, inaccurate news stories.

As a PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT, you can PROTEST in PUBLIC all you want.

You CANNOT, however, PROTEST INSIDE ANY BUILDING or at any RALLY where there is space that has been leased, reserved or retained by a PRIVATE INDIVIDUAL OR GROUP. Protesting likeT HAT is a CRIME, SUCKFACE!!

You MIGHT want to learn how the LAW WORKS IN CONCERT WITH THE CONSTITUTION before you spew a bunch of DUMBASSERY EVEN MORE THAN YOU ALREADY HAVE!!

Sucks, huh??

Beekeeper » 19 Nov 2025, 6:17 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Nov 2025, 6:17 pm

As a PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT, you can PROTEST in PUBLIC all you want.

You CANNOT, however, PROTEST INSIDE ANY BUILDING or at any RALLY where there is space that has been leased, reserved or retained by a PRIVATE INDIVIDUAL OR GROUP. Protesting likeT HAT is a CRIME, SUCKFACE!!

You MIGHT want to learn how the LAW WORKS IN CONCERT WITH THE CONSTITUTION before you spew a bunch of DUMBASSERY EVEN MORE THAN YOU ALREADY HAVE!!

Sucks, huh??

  That has ZERO to do with tRump wanting to remove a media outlets license because he didn’t like the questions that they were asking   

where was the “protest” Cletus?   

damn you are dumb   
 
 

Mrkelly » 20 Nov 2025, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑

20 Nov 2025, 10:31 am

  That has ZERO to do with tRump wanting to remove a media outlets license because he didn’t like the questions that they were asking   

where was the “protest” Cletus?   

damn you are dumb 

I guess you would be OK with a pedophile hanging around your child's lemonade stand asking questions.....same thing.

RebelGator » 20 Nov 2025, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑

20 Nov 2025, 10:35 am

I guess you would be OK with a pedophile hanging around your child's lemonade stand asking questions.....same thing.

  even dumber 

Mrkelly » 20 Nov 2025, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑

20 Nov 2025, 10:37 am

  even dumber

Narrow, myopic views are a curse you can't seem to shake.

Has everyone donated to the ball room fund? You can be a part of history

Mrkelly » 06 Mar 2025, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Mar 2025, 2:37 pm

  tRump “truthed”

“All Federal Funding will STOP for any College, School, or University that allows illegal protests. Agitators will be imprisoned/or permanently sent back to the country from which they came. American students will be permanently expelled or, depending on on the crime, arrested. NO MASKS! Thank you for your attention to this matter.”

So you're in favor of criminal illegals, illegal protests (those without obtaining a permit), and the kind of terrorist threats being used against ICE and the entire Trump administration, while hurling rocks and bricks at ICE vehicles?

No surprise there!
But I'd bet you fully supported Biden's anti-1st Amendment right desires by his attempting to create a "Ministry of Truth", didn't you?
 

Mrkelly » 20 Nov 2025, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑

20 Nov 2025, 10:31 am

  That has ZERO to do with tRump wanting to remove a media outlets license because he didn’t like the questions that they were asking   

where was the “protest” Cletus?   

damn you are dumb 

Why is it that you think the President must tolerate snarky, biased questions from the reporter at ABC which has already been proven to have a hate-filled agenda against Trump?

Here's hoping that idiot reporter gets to eat crow publicly when all those liberal Democrats she loves get revealed as pedophiles and criminals!
 

Zeets2 » 20 Nov 2025, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Nov 2025, 12:01 pm

Why is it that you think the President must tolerate  which has already been proven to have a hate-filled agenda against Trump?

Here's hoping that idiot reporter gets to eat crow publicly when all those liberal Democrats she loves get revealed as pedophiles and criminals!

I think that he should tolerate snarky questions from the press to some degree 

And tRump is welcome to be snarky right back

what tRump is not allowed to do is threaten the licensing of the press because he is a **** snowflake 
 

Mrkelly » 20 Nov 2025, 4:03 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Nov 2025, 4:03 pm

I think that he should tolerate snarky questions from the press to some degree 

And tRump is welcome to be snarky right back

what tRump is not allowed to do is threaten the licensing of the press because he is a **** snowflake

Of course that's what you'd want, when the left-wing media is so biased against the president that their questions consist of nothing but one after another "gotcha" questions intended to discredit anything and everything Trump says or does.  Trump doesn't have to call on anyone that he knows is not a sincere journalist, and they DESERVE to be ignored or have their access to the President denied.

So tell me, Kelly.  Did you utter the same objections when a pissed off Biden cursed out and insulted reporters who posed questions he didn't like?  Was it OK when a cranky Biden promises to "beat the hell" out of CNN reporter Jake Tapper for questioning his mental cognitive abilities when he was posing the exact questions that every American was wondering about Biden's obvious dementia?  And wasn't it Obama who illegally spied on a Fox News reporter's phone records, calling James Rosen an "unindicted co-conspirator"?  Didn't Obama boot 3 conservative journalists off of Air Force One because he didn't like THEIR questions and the fact that they were supporters of John McCain?
No, OF COURSE you didn't object to ANY of that!
There are no accusations you could possibly make against Trump giving phony journalists a hard time that the last two idiot presidents you support didn't do the exact same thing or much worse, so stick your biased opinions where the sun doesn't shine!
 

Zeets2 » 21 Nov 2025, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑

21 Nov 2025, 10:32 am

Of course that's what you'd want, when the left-wing media is so biased against the president that their questions consist of nothing but one after another "gotcha" questions intended to discredit anything and everything Trump says or does.  Trump doesn't have to call on anyone that he knows is not a sincere journalist, and they DESERVE to be ignored or have their access to the President denied.

So tell me, Kelly.  Did you utter the same objections when a pissed off Biden cursed out and insulted reporters who posed questions he didn't like?  Was it OK when a cranky Biden promises to "beat the hell" out of CNN reporter Jake Tapper for questioning his mental cognitive abilities when he was posing the exact questions that every American was wondering about Biden's obvious dementia?  And wasn't it Obama who illegally spied on a Fox News reporter's phone records, calling James Rosen an "unindicted co-conspirator"?  Didn't Obama boot 3 conservative journalists off of Air Force One because he didn't like THEIR questions and the fact that they were supporters of John McCain?
No, OF COURSE you didn't object to ANY of that!
There are no accusations you could possibly make against Trump giving phony journalists a hard time that the last two idiot presidents you support didn't do the exact same thing or much worse, so stick your biased opinions where the sun doesn't shine!

Stop with the stupid wordy replies already

yur an idiot 

  BUTWHATABOUT 

NO president should threaten to take away the license of the press because his lil felling are hurt

not even tRump 
 

Zeets2 » 21 Nov 2025, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑

21 Nov 2025, 10:32 am

Of course that's what you'd want, when the left-wing media is so biased against the president that their questions consist of nothing but one after another "gotcha" questions intended to discredit anything and everything Trump says or does.  Trump doesn't have to call on anyone that he knows is not a sincere journalist, and they DESERVE to be ignored or have their access to the President denied.

So tell me, Kelly.  Did you utter the same objections when a pissed off Biden cursed out and insulted reporters who posed questions he didn't like?  Was it OK when a cranky Biden promises to "beat the hell" out of CNN reporter Jake Tapper for questioning his mental cognitive abilities when he was posing the exact questions that every American was wondering about Biden's obvious dementia?  And wasn't it Obama who illegally spied on a Fox News reporter's phone records, calling James Rosen an "unindicted co-conspirator"?  Didn't Obama boot 3 conservative journalists off of Air Force One because he didn't like THEIR questions and the fact that they were supporters of John McCain?
No, OF COURSE you didn't object to ANY of that!
There are no accusations you could possibly make against Trump giving phony journalists a hard time that the last two idiot presidents you support didn't do the exact same thing or much worse, so stick your biased opinions where the sun doesn't shine!

Plugs referred to a fox news reporter as a “stupid son of a bitch”

Come to think about it

This belongs here too

https://youtu.be/BB-Y2RCtlNQ?si=Ft64pNOGzmtcibI9 

 
 

Mrkelly » 21 Nov 2025, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Nov 2025, 12:09 pm

Come to think about it

This belongs here too

https://youtu.be/BB-Y2RCtlNQ?si=Ft64pNOGzmtcibI9 

 
 

 

What is stupid about this whole thing is service members are already obligated not to obey unlawful or illegal orders.  And the law members did not give any examples.  

Examples in a Military Context
Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), service members have a duty to disobey a "patently illegal" or "manifestly unlawful" order. Examples include:

• Targeting or intentionally harming civilians or non-combatants.
• Torturing or abusing prisoners of war or detainees.
• Committing war crimes such as looting or pillaging property.
• Falsifying official documents or legal records.
• • Using military force for unauthorized domestic law enforcement in violation of the Posse Comitatus Act (unless properly authorized by the Constitution or Congress).
  • Engaging in personal favors unrelated to military duty, such as ordering a subordinate to wash a personal vehicle.
  • Orders that are impossible to carry out, such as "swim across the Atlantic Ocean"

They get trained about this often.  So what unlawful orders have they been given?  
 

Mrkelly » 21 Nov 2025, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Nov 2025, 12:09 pm

Come to think about it

This belongs here too

https://youtu.be/BB-Y2RCtlNQ?si=Ft64pNOGzmtcibI9

Do you think they should be hung together at once or consecutively?

Huey » 21 Nov 2025, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Nov 2025, 12:13 pm

What is stupid about this whole thing is service members are already obligated not to obey unlawful or illegal orders.  And the law members did not give any examples.  

Examples in a Military Context
Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), service members have a duty to disobey a "patently illegal" or "manifestly unlawful" order. Examples include:

• Targeting or intentionally harming civilians or non-combatants.
• Torturing or abusing prisoners of war or detainees.
• Committing war crimes such as looting or pillaging property.
• Falsifying official documents or legal records.
• • Using military force for unauthorized domestic law enforcement in violation of the Posse Comitatus Act (unless properly authorized by the Constitution or Congress).
  • Engaging in personal favors unrelated to military duty, such as ordering a subordinate to wash a personal vehicle.
  • Orders that are impossible to carry out, such as "swim across the Atlantic Ocean"

They get trained about this often.  So what unlawful orders have they been given?

I don’t think that the point was what tRump has done

Its a warning to the troops about what tRump might do 

and to remind them that they don’t have to “follow illegal orders”

A weird thing to say for sure

The weirdest thing is … The people tRump wants to put in jail are veterans 

even weirdest… they felt the need to say it

but

It’s a cornered rat thing 
 
 

Mrkelly » 21 Nov 2025, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑

21 Nov 2025, 11:33 am

Stop with the stupid wordy replies already

yur an idiot 

  BUTWHATABOUT 

NO president should threaten to take away the license of the press because his lil felling are hurt

not even tRump

Yeah, obviously you don't like it when your example gets thrown in your face, do you?
And Trump NEVER threatened anyone that he would take away their license.  Here's is quote stating nothing but HIS OPINION of biased reporters:
"I think the license should be taken away from ABC, because your news is so fake and it's so wrong,"
Trump was calm and never even raised his voice when stating his opinion, compared to Biden screaming at Tapper after THIS exchange which actually proves the validity of Tapper's question:

Angry Joe Biden Threatens Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson
Matt Margolis May 30, 2025

But when a reporter brought up the ongoing public and internal party debate about Biden’s cognitive sharpness and stamina — an issue that’s dogged him for years — the former president didn’t hold back.“You can see that I’m mentally incompetent and I can’t walk,” Biden snapped.
You read that right. That is transcribed accurately.
And that’s not even the worst part. After that, he said, “and I can beat the hell out of both of them,” referring to CNN’s Jake Tapper and Axios’ Alex Thompson, the coauthors of the book “Original Sin,” which details his cognitive decline.

What you don't like is the fact that these examples show your insane, biased hatred for Trump while giving a pass to Biden and Obama when THEY responded similarly with anger toward a reporter.
 
 
 

Zeets2 » 21 Nov 2025, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Nov 2025, 3:36 pm

Yeah, obviously you don't like it when your example gets thrown in your face, do you?
And Trump NEVER threatened anyone that he would take away their license.  Here's is quote stating nothing but HIS OPINION of biased reporters:
"I think the license should be taken away from ABC, because your news is so fake and it's so wrong,"
Trump was calm and never even raised his voice when stating his opinion, compared to Biden screaming at Tapper after THIS exchange which actually proves the validity of Tapper's question:

What you don't like is the fact that these examples show your insane, biased hatred for Trump while giving a pass to Biden and Obama when THEY responded similarly with anger toward a reporter.

  tRumpers