Liberal Forum

 A challenge for BV. @Cannonpointer  though we both know he will not accept, but just in case the planets happen to be aligned to induce an anomaly, would you mind modding?
The stakes.
If I lose, then I am permanently banned. If he loses then he is banned for a month. 

What a deal!
Ladies and gentlemen, longtime forum warriors, and admirers of Olympic-level debate dodging,

We are gathered here today to honor a true forum legend. A man who has spent years perfecting the fine art of copy-pasting, cherry-picking, dodging direct challenges, and calling people stupid as his only counterargument. Yes, I am, of course, talking about @Blackvegetable  , the grandmaster of quoting without comprehension.
 In his honor, I am issuing a simple challenge that he will, without question, refuse to accept.Below is my full statement on job creation:

Survivorship bias example: The numbers from the senile pedo (Biden) and the ho didn't reflect the gross, only the net job creation. Their job creation figure typically reflects net jobs added only. The problem with that is that this figure does not account for jobs that were lost during the same period or workers who exited the labor market entirely. Some industries have experienced significant job losses that are overshadowed by growth in other areas. AI being one example of the growth that overshadowed the loss of manufacturing jobs. However, only the AI jobs were counted, while not accounting for the loss of manufacturing jobs. That's just one example that happened under the senile pedo and the Ho. A focus on job creation without accounting for the quality or sustainability of these jobs skews the perception of the labor market's true health.

 Now, here’s the challenge for Veghead

1. Debunk it in your own words. No copy-pasting, no link dumps. Just an actual, reasoned response.
2. No cherry-picking. Address the entire statement, not just one sentence out of context.
3. No insults as a replacement for an argument. If “so stupid” is your best response, you’ve already lost.
4. Explain why my analysis is wrong. If net job numbers are an accurate reflection of job creation, prove it. If AI job growth doesn't overshadow manufacturing losses, explain why.

This should be easy if my statement is as wrong as he claims. So, what will it be? Will the Copy-Paste King finally step up and offer an actual argument, or will he do what we all expect—dodge, cherry-pick, and post another quote with an insult?We all know the answer, but hey, let’s give him a chance to prove us wrong.

Vegas » 07 Mar 2025, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2025, 12:35 pm

 A challenge for BV. @Cannonpointer  though we both know he will not accept, but just in case the planets happen to be aligned to induce an anomaly, would you mind modding?
The stakes.
If I lose, then I am permanently banned. If he loses then he is banned for a month. 

What a deal!
Ladies and gentlemen, longtime forum warriors, and admirers of Olympic-level debate dodging,

We are gathered here today to honor a true forum legend. A man who has spent years perfecting the fine art of copy-pasting, cherry-picking, dodging direct challenges, and calling people stupid as his only counterargument. Yes, I am, of course, talking about @Blackvegetable  , the grandmaster of quoting without comprehension.
 In his honor, I am issuing a simple challenge that he will, without question, refuse to accept.Below is my full statement on job creation:

 Now, here’s the challenge for Veghead

1. Debunk it in your own words. No copy-pasting, no link dumps. Just an actual, reasoned response.
2. No cherry-picking. Address the entire statement, not just one sentence out of context.
3. No insults as a replacement for an argument. If “so stupid” is your best response, you’ve already lost.
4. Explain why my analysis is wrong. If net job numbers are an accurate reflection of job creation, prove it. If AI job growth doesn't overshadow manufacturing losses, explain why.

This should be easy if my statement is as wrong as he claims. So, what will it be? Will the Copy-Paste King finally step up and offer an actual argument, or will he do what we all expect—dodge, cherry-pick, and post another quote with an insult?We all know the answer, but hey, let’s give him a chance to prove us wrong.

@Blackvegetable       This is your chance to get rid of me permanently. All you need to do is turn your conviction and confidence into a sound argument. Then Bam! I am out of here forever. 

Hey, what's keeping the *** dick sucker?

murdock » 07 Mar 2025, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2025, 12:50 pm

Hey, what's keeping the *** dick sucker?

The same thing that always keeps him from accepting challenges from anyone---his tiny balls. 

Vegas » 07 Mar 2025, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2025, 12:50 pm

The same thing that always keeps him from accepting challenges from anyone---his tiny balls.

If he has balls I bet they're in his mouth.

Vegas » 07 Mar 2025, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2025, 12:35 pm

 A challenge for BV. @Cannonpointer  though we both know he will not accept, but just in case the planets happen to be aligned to induce an anomaly, would you mind modding?
The stakes.
If I lose, then I am permanently banned. If he loses then he is banned for a month. 

What a deal!
Ladies and gentlemen, longtime forum warriors, and admirers of Olympic-level debate dodging,

We are gathered here today to honor a true forum legend. A man who has spent years perfecting the fine art of copy-pasting, cherry-picking, dodging direct challenges, and calling people stupid as his only counterargument. Yes, I am, of course, talking about @Blackvegetable  , the grandmaster of quoting without comprehension.
 In his honor, I am issuing a simple challenge that he will, without question, refuse to accept.Below is my full statement on job creation:

 Now, here’s the challenge for Veghead

1. Debunk it in your own words. No copy-pasting, no link dumps. Just an actual, reasoned response.
2. No cherry-picking. Address the entire statement, not just one sentence out of context.
3. No insults as a replacement for an argument. If “so stupid” is your best response, you’ve already lost.
4. Explain why my analysis is wrong. If net job numbers are an accurate reflection of job creation, prove it. If AI job growth doesn't overshadow manufacturing losses, explain why.

This should be easy if my statement is as wrong as he claims. So, what will it be? Will the Copy-Paste King finally step up and offer an actual argument, or will he do what we all expect—dodge, cherry-pick, and post another quote with an insult?We all know the answer, but hey, let’s give him a chance to prove us wrong.

  Looks like a lot of work for a tribute tread

Mrkelly » 07 Mar 2025, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2025, 12:57 pm

  Looks like a lot of work for a tribute tread

Demeaning narcissists can be a lot of work. However, I have a civic duty to demoralize them wherever they may roam. It's all part of the job, my man. It's all part of the job.   

Vegas » 07 Mar 2025, 12:58 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Mar 2025, 12:58 pm

Demeaning narcissists can be a lot of work. However, I have a civic duty to demoralize them wherever they may roam. It's all part of the job, my man. It's all part of the job. 

you seem obsessed 

but hey

whatever lets you sleep at night