Liberal Forum

Documents signed by Biden were done using an autopen, report finds

He was a lazy ****

righteous » 10 Mar 2025, 1:32 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2025, 1:32 pm

Documents signed by Biden were done using an autopen, report finds

And just think, Biden wanted to run again. 

BuckNaked » 10 Mar 2025, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2025, 2:20 pm

He was a lazy ****

Don't think he was lazy
I think someone else was approving things 

Vegas » 10 Mar 2025, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2025, 2:35 pm

And just think, Biden wanted to run again.

And he thinks he would have won   

righteous » 10 Mar 2025, 1:32 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2025, 1:32 pm

Documents signed by Biden were done using an autopen, report finds

When someone other than The Heritage Foundation reports it, I'll give it credibility...just like I would if The Huff & Puff posted something about Trump.

ConsRule » 10 Mar 2025, 3:49 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2025, 3:49 pm

When someone other than The Heritage Foundation reports it, I'll give it credibility...just like I would if The Huff & Puff posted something about Trump.

HERITAGE HAS ZERO TO DO WITH IT. THEY EXAMINED ALL THE DOCUMENTS
MANY PRESIDENTS HAVE USED THE AUTO PEN IN THE PAST GOING BACK TO TRUMAN. THE DIFFERENCE BEING, BIDEN WAS MENTALLY IMPAIRED AND MOST LIKELY KNEW NOTHING ABOUT WHAT WAS BEING SIGNED 

YOU DON'T HAVE TO BE EINSTEIN TO IDENTIFY EXACT SIGNATURES CREATED BY AN AUTOPEN. 
SECONDLY, HAD YOU SEEN BIDEN PHYSICALLY SIGN ALL162 EXECUTIVE ORDERS?  HE HAD SIGNED A FEW DURING THE FIRST LIVE PRESS MEETING. JOHNSON, IN AN INTERVIEW SAID THE FORMER PRESIDENT BIDEN DID NOT REMEMBER SIGNING AN EXECUTIVE ORDER ON ENERGY EXPORTS.
YOU HAVE SEEN TRUMP SIGN MANY OF HIS.
MOST EVERY DOCUMENT WITH BIDENS SIGNATURE USED THE SAME AUTOPEN SIGNATURE EXCEPT FOR THE ANNOUNCEMENT THAT HE WAS DROPPING OUT OF THE RACE.

NOTHING HERE IS A BIG SURPRISE 
 

Vegas » 10 Mar 2025, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2025, 2:35 pm

And just think, Biden wanted to run again.

YOU MEAN JILL WANTED HIM TO RUN AGAIN
 
 

righteous » 10 Mar 2025, 8:40 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2025, 8:40 pm

HERITAGE HAS ZERO TO DO WITH IT. THEY EXAMINED ALL THE DOCUMENTS
MANY PRESIDENTS HAVE USED THE AUTO PEN IN THE PAST GOING BACK TO TRUMAN. THE DIFFERENCE BEING, BIDEN WAS MENTALLY IMPAIRED AND MOST LIKELY KNEW NOTHING ABOUT WHAT WAS BEING SIGNED 

YOU DON'T HAVE TO BE EINSTEIN TO IDENTIFY EXACT SIGNATURES CREATED BY AN AUTOPEN. 
SECONDLY, HAD YOU SEEN BIDEN PHYSICALLY SIGN ALL162 EXECUTIVE ORDERS?  HE HAD SIGNED A FEW DURING THE FIRST LIVE PRESS MEETING. JOHNSON, IN AN INTERVIEW SAID THE FORMER PRESIDENT BIDEN DID NOT REMEMBER SIGNING AN EXECUTIVE ORDER ON ENERGY EXPORTS.
YOU HAVE SEEN TRUMP SIGN MANY OF HIS.
MOST EVERY DOCUMENT WITH BIDENS SIGNATURE USED THE SAME AUTOPEN SIGNATURE EXCEPT FOR THE ANNOUNCEMENT THAT HE WAS DROPPING OUT OF THE RACE.

NOTHING HERE IS A BIG SURPRISE

I know all that.  And when someone other than The Heritage Foundation examines them and agrees with the reports, I will give the report credibility.  I have never given an allegation/assertion made by a partisan organization...media or not...credence when it involves a politician on the "other side" when they are the ONLY group saying it.  You may not like that, but tough ****.
 

righteous » 10 Mar 2025, 8:40 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2025, 8:40 pm

HERITAGE HAS ZERO TO DO WITH IT. THEY EXAMINED ALL THE DOCUMENTS
MANY PRESIDENTS HAVE USED THE AUTO PEN IN THE PAST GOING BACK TO TRUMAN. THE DIFFERENCE BEING, BIDEN WAS MENTALLY IMPAIRED AND MOST LIKELY KNEW NOTHING ABOUT WHAT WAS BEING SIGNED 

YOU DON'T HAVE TO BE EINSTEIN TO IDENTIFY EXACT SIGNATURES CREATED BY AN AUTOPEN. 
SECONDLY, HAD YOU SEEN BIDEN PHYSICALLY SIGN ALL162 EXECUTIVE ORDERS?  HE HAD SIGNED A FEW DURING THE FIRST LIVE PRESS MEETING. JOHNSON, IN AN INTERVIEW SAID THE FORMER PRESIDENT BIDEN DID NOT REMEMBER SIGNING AN EXECUTIVE ORDER ON ENERGY EXPORTS.
YOU HAVE SEEN TRUMP SIGN MANY OF HIS.
MOST EVERY DOCUMENT WITH BIDENS SIGNATURE USED THE SAME AUTOPEN SIGNATURE EXCEPT FOR THE ANNOUNCEMENT THAT HE WAS DROPPING OUT OF THE RACE.

NOTHING HERE IS A BIG SURPRISE

MANY PRESIDENTS HAVE USED THE AUTO PEN IN THE PAST GOING BACK TO TRUMAN.

:rofl:  

righteous » 10 Mar 2025, 1:32 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2025, 1:32 pm

Documents signed by Biden were done using an autopen, report finds

It sounds like all of those Pardons he signed are invalid.
 

BuckNaked » 10 Mar 2025, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2025, 3:35 pm

And he thinks he would have won 

No.  Biden is incapable of thinking.  Jill thinks he could have won.  Biden's brain has about as much thought in it as tomato soup.
 

ConsRule » 11 Mar 2025, 5:57 am » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2025, 5:57 am

I know all that.  And when someone other than The Heritage Foundation examines them and agrees with the reports, I will give the report credibility.  I have never given an allegation/assertion made by a partisan organization...media or not...credence when it involves a politician on the "other side" when they are the ONLY group saying it.  You may not like that, but tough ****.

IT'S A MORE THAN OBVIOUS SCENARIO FOR ANYONE WITH HALF A BRAIN. DOESN'T MATTER WHO THE **** REPORTS IT.
YOU CAN'T TELL WHEN THE FACTS ARE SLAPPING YOU UPSIDE THE HEAD. 
 NOT MY **** PROBLEM
 

Skans » 11 Mar 2025, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2025, 10:38 am

It sounds like all of those Pardons he signed are invalid.

MIGHT BE HARD TO PROVE HE WASN'T PRESENT WHEN DOCUMENTS WERE SIGNED
 

righteous » 11 Mar 2025, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2025, 2:51 pm

MIGHT BE HARD TO PROVE HE WASN'T PRESENT WHEN DOCUMENTS WERE SIGNED

Yeah, but the World can prove he was incompetent at the time they were robo-signed.  Heck, even the FBI said he was too incompetent to prosecute for stealing classified documents.
 

righteous » 11 Mar 2025, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2025, 2:51 pm

MIGHT BE HARD TO PROVE HE WASN'T PRESENT WHEN DOCUMENTS WERE SIGNED

True, but what are the odds he was awake at the same time?

ConsRule » 10 Mar 2025, 3:49 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2025, 3:49 pm

When someone other than The Heritage Foundation reports it, I'll give it credibility...just like I would if The Huff & Puff posted something about Trump.

https://www.heritage.org/public-health/ ... n-covid-19

 

righteous » 10 Mar 2025, 1:32 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Mar 2025, 1:32 pm

Documents signed by Biden were done using an autopen, report finds

I heard the 8 Billion Dollar Transgenic Mouse dressed in drag and used one of Trump's sharpies to sign it.

ConsRule » 11 Mar 2025, 5:57 am » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2025, 5:57 am

I know all that.  And when someone other than The Heritage Foundation examines them and agrees with the reports, I will give the report credibility.  I have never given an allegation/assertion made by a partisan organization...media or not...credence when it involves a politician on the "other side" when they are the ONLY group saying it.  You may not like that, but tough ****.

Dude the heritage foundations economist who assisted Kudlow in the first shyt show was on Fox the other day pleading for sanity on the tariff madness. He is a familiar face and has been an acceptable source on the side you have chosen. I guess he goes in the MAGA Garbage can now.

Tariffs are not admired in the Project 2025 Mandate for Destruction..

 
Kudlow got regurgitated and sent back to Fox.  From my perspective it's a bright spot in the 47th Reich Media Conglomerate.

Skans » 11 Mar 2025, 3:05 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2025, 3:05 pm

Yeah, but the World can prove he was incompetent at the time they were robo-signed.  Heck, even the FBI said he was too incompetent to prosecute for stealing classified documents.

LEFTISTS ALWAYS HAD THEIR OWN SET OF RULES. 
I'M WAITING FOR PATEL TO SEND THE EVIDENCE TO BONDI TO START THE PROSECUTIONS. TIMES A WASTING BUT I WON'T HOLD MY BREATH