Liberal Forum

He said Grifty "should listen to Steven"...

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6369850725112

Gotta love the host speaking somewhat truthily....

But where did they dig up someone who considers Steve either an economist and/or worth heeding?

The nomination stirred immediate criticism by economists,[64][65][14][66] and was widely viewed as the most political appointment to the Federal Reserve Board since the 1980s.[43][67] Benn Steil, director of international economics for the Council on Foreign Relations, stated he found the decision appalling.[68] Monetary economist George Selgin stated he believed Moore was unfit to serve on the Board.[65] Economist Justin Wolfers called the selection of Moore "the first genuinely bad Trump pick for the Fed" and called on the Senate not to confirm Moore.[43] Harvard economics professor Greg Mankiw said that Moore "does not have the intellectual gravitas" for the position.[69][70] Economist Menzie Chinn noted that Moore has not authored or co-authored any peer-reviewed journal articles.[71

Steve draws jeers from both left and right...
 

If you pull your head out of those economist's asses, you would greatly increase your probability of being right.

Economists rarely get economic predictions "completely right," as forecasting the future is inherently difficult, and even the most experienced economists often miss significant economic trends or events, making their accuracy rate generally considered low, especially when predicting far into the future; studies have shown that even when confident in their forecasts, economists may only be correct a small percentage of the time.

Blackvegetable » 11 Mar 2025, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2025, 1:27 pm

He said Grifty "should listen to Steven"...

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6369850725112

Gotta love the host speaking somewhat truthily....

But where did they dig up someone who considers Steve either an economist and/or worth heeding?

The nomination stirred immediate criticism by economists,[64][65][14][66] and was widely viewed as the most political appointment to the Federal Reserve Board since the 1980s.[43][67] Benn Steil, director of international economics for the Council on Foreign Relations, stated he found the decision appalling.[68] Monetary economist George Selgin stated he believed Moore was unfit to serve on the Board.[65] Economist Justin Wolfers called the selection of Moore "the first genuinely bad Trump pick for the Fed" and called on the Senate not to confirm Moore.[43] Harvard economics professor Greg Mankiw said that Moore "does not have the intellectual gravitas" for the position.[69][70] Economist Menzie Chinn noted that Moore has not authored or co-authored any peer-reviewed journal articles.[71

Steve draws jeers from both left and right...

Lying *** traitor.

But Grifty's thinking about buying a Tesla.

Blackvegetable » 11 Mar 2025, 3:17 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2025, 3:17 pm

But Grifty's thinking about buying a Tesla.

 

Nothing wrong with something produced by the free market that appeals to a customer.  That is how it works.  
 

*Huey » 11 Mar 2025, 3:26 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2025, 3:26 pm

Nothing wrong with something produced by the free market that appeals to a customer.  That is how it works.

And tens of billions in federal subsidies..

Bit Grifty must have been sincere...he was really working that phantom squeeze box.

Blackvegetable » 11 Mar 2025, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2025, 1:27 pm

He said Grifty "should listen to Steven"...

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6369850725112

Gotta love the host speaking somewhat truthily....

But where did they dig up someone who considers Steve either an economist and/or worth heeding?

The nomination stirred immediate criticism by economists,[64][65][14][66] and was widely viewed as the most political appointment to the Federal Reserve Board since the 1980s.[43][67] Benn Steil, director of international economics for the Council on Foreign Relations, stated he found the decision appalling.[68] Monetary economist George Selgin stated he believed Moore was unfit to serve on the Board.[65] Economist Justin Wolfers called the selection of Moore "the first genuinely bad Trump pick for the Fed" and called on the Senate not to confirm Moore.[43] Harvard economics professor Greg Mankiw said that Moore "does not have the intellectual gravitas" for the position.[69][70] Economist Menzie Chinn noted that Moore has not authored or co-authored any peer-reviewed journal articles.[71

Steve draws jeers from both left and right...

How many hours a week, 'hole?

RebelGator » 11 Mar 2025, 3:41 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2025, 3:41 pm

How many hours a week, 'hole?

 

RebelGator » 11 Mar 2025, 3:41 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2025, 3:41 pm

How many hours a week, 'hole?

Ask Hole

 

Blackvegetable » 11 Mar 2025, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2025, 1:27 pm

He said Grifty "should listen to Steven"...

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6369850725112

Gotta love the host speaking somewhat truthily....

But where did they dig up someone who considers Steve either an economist and/or worth heeding?

The nomination stirred immediate criticism by economists,[64][65][14][66] and was widely viewed as the most political appointment to the Federal Reserve Board since the 1980s.[43][67] Benn Steil, director of international economics for the Council on Foreign Relations, stated he found the decision appalling.[68] Monetary economist George Selgin stated he believed Moore was unfit to serve on the Board.[65] Economist Justin Wolfers called the selection of Moore "the first genuinely bad Trump pick for the Fed" and called on the Senate not to confirm Moore.[43] Harvard economics professor Greg Mankiw said that Moore "does not have the intellectual gravitas" for the position.[69][70] Economist Menzie Chinn noted that Moore has not authored or co-authored any peer-reviewed journal articles.[71

Steve draws jeers from both left and right...

Hey dickhead....

Why not light your hair on fire and run around in circles. 

If you are gonna do this fake outrage **** all the time at least put a little effort into it

Blackvegetable » 11 Mar 2025, 4:56 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2025, 4:56 pm

Ask Hole

I will, what's your *** mammies number? Or is she still in the pen?

Blackvegetable » 11 Mar 2025, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2025, 1:27 pm

He said Grifty "should listen to Steven"...

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6369850725112

Gotta love the host speaking somewhat truthily....

But where did they dig up someone who considers Steve either an economist and/or worth heeding?

The nomination stirred immediate criticism by economists,[64][65][14][66] and was widely viewed as the most political appointment to the Federal Reserve Board since the 1980s.[43][67] Benn Steil, director of international economics for the Council on Foreign Relations, stated he found the decision appalling.[68] Monetary economist George Selgin stated he believed Moore was unfit to serve on the Board.[65] Economist Justin Wolfers called the selection of Moore "the first genuinely bad Trump pick for the Fed" and called on the Senate not to confirm Moore.[43] Harvard economics professor Greg Mankiw said that Moore "does not have the intellectual gravitas" for the position.[69][70] Economist Menzie Chinn noted that Moore has not authored or co-authored any peer-reviewed journal articles.[71

Steve draws jeers from both left and right...

like economist wannabe Paul krugman?
 

ROG62 » 11 Mar 2025, 6:06 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2025, 6:06 pm

like economist wannabe Paul krugman?

JuCo,

Why you gotta be so bitter?
 

Blackvegetable » 11 Mar 2025, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2025, 1:27 pm

He said Grifty "should listen to Steven"...

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6369850725112

Gotta love the host speaking somewhat truthily....

But where did they dig up someone who considers Steve either an economist and/or worth heeding?

The nomination stirred immediate criticism by economists,[64][65][14][66] and was widely viewed as the most political appointment to the Federal Reserve Board since the 1980s.[43][67] Benn Steil, director of international economics for the Council on Foreign Relations, stated he found the decision appalling.[68] Monetary economist George Selgin stated he believed Moore was unfit to serve on the Board.[65] Economist Justin Wolfers called the selection of Moore "the first genuinely bad Trump pick for the Fed" and called on the Senate not to confirm Moore.[43] Harvard economics professor Greg Mankiw said that Moore "does not have the intellectual gravitas" for the position.[69][70] Economist Menzie Chinn noted that Moore has not authored or co-authored any peer-reviewed journal articles.[71

Steve draws jeers from both left and right...

No thoughts, etc...copy/paste

1, 10.13

1. Your OP/Claim, your job.
2. I will not entertain your stalking
3. If I am a moron, then you lost 7 times to one, so what does that make you?
4. Hides.
5. Prove you answered it the first time..."not a penny" LIE LIE LIE!
6. **** your questions/demands , or 3k greenies.
7. Biden's survivorship bias skewed the "net" result. 
8. Level 0
9. Still no thoughts
10. Video
11. Hides behind copy/pasted ****. Still no intelligent thoughts.
12. Evades. 
13. Turns it around on others. 
14. Projecting
15. lie

There are more, but this will do for now.

 

Blackvegetable » 11 Mar 2025, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2025, 1:27 pm

He said Grifty "should listen to Steven"...

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6369850725112

Gotta love the host speaking somewhat truthily....

But where did they dig up someone who considers Steve either an economist and/or worth heeding?

The nomination stirred immediate criticism by economists,[64][65][14][66] and was widely viewed as the most political appointment to the Federal Reserve Board since the 1980s.[43][67] Benn Steil, director of international economics for the Council on Foreign Relations, stated he found the decision appalling.[68] Monetary economist George Selgin stated he believed Moore was unfit to serve on the Board.[65] Economist Justin Wolfers called the selection of Moore "the first genuinely bad Trump pick for the Fed" and called on the Senate not to confirm Moore.[43] Harvard economics professor Greg Mankiw said that Moore "does not have the intellectual gravitas" for the position.[69][70] Economist Menzie Chinn noted that Moore has not authored or co-authored any peer-reviewed journal articles.[71

Steve draws jeers from both left and right...

Space Condos for Sale.  Transport on the USS Brooklyn Bridge.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFihi5cPqqE
 

Vegas » 11 Mar 2025, 6:55 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2025, 6:55 pm

No thoughts, etc...copy/paste

1, 10.13

You have no idea who Steven Moore is.

Blackvegetable » 11 Mar 2025, 7:11 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2025, 7:11 pm

You have no idea who Steven Moore is.

Just as I predicted. 13. And still no thoughts. 

**** easy as hell. Pathetic.

1. Your OP/Claim, your job.
2. I will not entertain your stalking
3. If I am a moron, then you lost 7 times to one, so what does that make you?
4. Hides.
5. Mistake vs Lie/ Prove you answered it the first time/ "not a penny" LIE LIE LIE!
6. **** your questions/demands , or 3k greenies.
7. Biden's survivorship bias skewed the "net" result. 
8. Level 0
9. Still no thoughts
10. Video
11. Hides behind copy/pasted ****. Still no intelligent thoughts.
12. Evades. 
13. Turns it around on others. 
14. Projecting
15. lie

There are more, but this will do for now.

Vegas » 11 Mar 2025, 7:13 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2025, 7:13 pm

Just as I predicted. 13. And still no thoughts. 

**** easy as hell. Pathetic.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Moore_(writer)

He pleaded on Fox News to stop the tariff 'r offs

Christ Man they are becoming TerrorIfs..

The phooking red hats thinks it's when you pull tee pee of the dispenser roll
 

JohnnyYou » 11 Mar 2025, 7:21 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2025, 7:21 pm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Moore_(writer)

No the point. Veghead has an embarrassing habit of posting links while refusing to give any intelligent thoughts of his own on his own **** link. Then he turns it around on everybody else to come up with thoughts so he can belt them with 600k questions. If he is going to post a claim/link, then he needs to defend it instead of putting everyone else on the defensive. 

He does that incessantly. Hence, my usual "no thougths, etc...copy/paste.

Vegas » 11 Mar 2025, 7:24 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Mar 2025, 7:24 pm

No the point. Veghead has an embarrassing habit of posting links while refusing to give any intelligent thoughts of his own on his own **** link. Then he turns it around on everybody else to come up with thoughts so he can belt them with 600k questions. If he is going to post a claim/link, then he needs to defend it instead of putting everyone else on the defensive. 

He does that incessantly. Hence, my usual "no thougths, etc...copy/paste.

Well if BV is not the greatest debater on the planet than ok.  As far as I am concerned @Cannon Pointer  is the only one worth his salt in arguing for a conservative cause. We all get lost in our confirmation bias.  CP is the only one on this rag who won any of my heart and mind on any subject in this place.

We can debate how the debate takes place or we can discuss the debate.  Did you actually see what Stephen Moore said?  

There are 188 hits for tariff in here..  I certainly don't have the time to adequately debate the context of every mention in it.  It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see  the policy being brought forth is a wrecking ball.  The ball is going to smash some red hats out of existence.  America actually needs them to say "Hey I don't want to row this boat over a cliff"

https://static.project2025.org/2025_Man ... p_FULL.pdf