Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
G*d, Texas, Trump, 12 Year Old Girl....
G*d, Texas, Trump, 12 Year Old Girl....
By Blackvegetable
Today 6:11 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
Today 6:11 am
It's like a cliche...
Maybe we should deport these freaks...
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/12/us/r ... arges.html
Robert Morris, the founder of a Texas megachurch and a former faith adviser to the Trump White House, was indicted Wednesday on charges that he molested a girl over several years in the 1980s, the Oklahoma Attorney General’s Office said.
Stand by your rapist
And show the world you love him.....
Maybe we should deport these freaks...
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/12/us/r ... arges.html
Robert Morris, the founder of a Texas megachurch and a former faith adviser to the Trump White House, was indicted Wednesday on charges that he molested a girl over several years in the 1980s, the Oklahoma Attorney General’s Office said.
Stand by your rapist
And show the world you love him.....
Today 6:13 am
Blackvegetable » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑ It's like a cliche...
Maybe we should deport these freaks...
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/12/us/r ... arges.html
Robert Morris, the founder of a Texas megachurch and a former faith adviser to the Trump White House, was indicted Wednesday on charges that he molested a girl over several years in the 1980s, the Oklahoma Attorney General’s Office said.
Stand by your rapist
And show the world you love him.....
Trump was never convicted of rape. Keep on lying
Today 6:16 am
How would you describe someone found liable for an act defined by DoJ and UCMJ as Rape?
Today 6:18 am
Blackvegetable » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑ How would you describe someone found liable for an act defined by DoJ and UCMJ as Rape?
This is the FACT.... TRUMP HAS NOT BEEN CONVICTED OF RAPE
Today 6:21 am
You aren't answering the question, Duck
Now you understand why I ignore yours.
Nod.
Today 6:22 am
Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You aren't answering the question, Duck
Now you understand why I ignore yours.
Nod.
I answered your question.
Today 6:24 am
There was zero evidence that Trump raped Carroll.Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ How would you describe someone found liable for an act defined by DoJ and UCMJ as Rape?
Today 6:27 am
False.
The preponderance of the evidence says he did.
Your feefees don't matter.
Today 6:29 am
Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ False.
The preponderance of the evidence says he did.
Your feefees don't matter.
Yet... he was not convicted of rape.
Today 6:31 am
How would you describe someone found liable for an act defined by DoJ and UCMJ as Rape?
Today 6:33 am
Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ How would you describe someone found liable for an act defined by DoJ and UCMJ as Rape?
He was not convicted of rape... what part of that do you not understand?
Today 6:36 am
There was zero evidence that Trump raped Carroll.Blackvegetable » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ False.
The preponderance of the evidence says he did.
Your feefees don't matter.
Your feefees don't matter
Today 6:42 am
TRUMP is not in the military. He is not subject to the military law.Blackvegetable » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ How would you describe someone found liable for an act defined by DoJ and UCMJ as Rape?
Today 6:44 am
“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.*GHETTOBLASTER » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ There was zero evidence that Trump raped Carroll.
Your feefees don't matter
He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
That, unambiguously and directly, disproves your assertion.
You will now proceed to demonstrate why I never need to disprove anything to you...
Today 6:46 am
Doesn't answer the question.MR-7 » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ TRUMP is not in the military. He is not subject to the military law.
Today 6:49 am
There was zero evidence and no eye witnesses......[you look so easily duped]Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ “The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.
He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
That, unambiguously and directly, disproves your assertion.
You will now proceed to demonstrate why I never need to disprove anything to you...
Today 6:57 am
Here is the totally ridiculous "testimony" of each and every so called "witness" who in fact WITNESSED NOTHING.....Blackvegetable » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ “The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.
He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
That, unambiguously and directly, disproves your assertion.
You will now proceed to demonstrate why I never need to disprove anything to you...
Keep digging that great big hole full of STUPID for yourself Richard..it's always my pleasure to prove what a totally brainwashed and misinformed RUBE you are.
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/0 ... r-00095179
Today 7:07 am
The jury has issued its verdict.*GHETTOBLASTER » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Here is the totally ridiculous "testimony" of each and every so called "witness" who in fact WITNESSED NOTHING.....
Keep digging that great big hole full of STUPID for yourself Richard..it's always my pleasure to prove what a totally brainwashed and misinformed RUBE you are.
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/0 ... r-00095179
E. Jean Carroll accused several men of sexual assault including a babysitter’s boyfriend. a dentist, a camp counselor, a college date, a boss, and Les Moonves from CBS – and, of course, Donald Trump.
She couldn’t recall the date, month, season, or year the incident happened
She never told anyone in the media about it, despite being publicly obsessed with her own sexuality
The dress she claims to have been wearing didn’t exist at the time
Her description of the dressing room at Bergdorf Goodman was inaccurate, making her sequence of events impossible
Her lawsuit was bankrolled by Jeffrey Epstein pal and Democrat (and Nikki Haley) mega-donor Reid Hoffman
Democrats created a law (The Adult Survivors Act in 2022) to enable her lawsuit to proceed
Her accusation is the exact plotline of an episode of Law & Order (one of her “favorite shows”)
Trump’s Apprentice was also one of her favorite shows
She has a history of falsely accusing men of rape, including Les Moonves
She told Anderson Cooper, “most people think of rape as being sexy. Think of the fantasies.”
She made a career promoting promiscuity, even writing glowingly of sexual assault and naming her cat Vagina
Carroll’s interviews on TV, social media posts, and inconsistent information concerning her allegations should have been enough to throw out any case, but not with Judge Kaplan.
None of her "witnesses" witnessed the alleged sexual assault".I
The presiding judge has clarified it.
Your feefees are of no consequence whatsoever.
Today 7:08 am
Blackvegetable » 52 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ How would you describe someone found liable for an act defined by DoJ and UCMJ as Rape?
NOT GUILTY OF RAPE!!
Like that NY State JURY FOUND!!
Sucks, huh?? Because he wasn't in a FEDERAL COURTROOM, DIKSUKM!! Which UNDER OUR CONSTITUTION, NY State's LAWS PREVAIL!!
How **** STUPID ARE YOU TO THINK OTHERWISE??
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
Today 7:10 am
Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ The jury has issued its verdict.
The presiding judge has clarified it.
Your feefees are of no consequence whatsoever.
No, DIKSUKM, the "judge" wrote what his OPINION happened to be which has ZERO BEARING ON ANY JURY VERDICT!! PERIOD!!
Now run as we once again ASK YOU TO TELL US WHAT THE JURY FOUND!!
We have posted that VERDICT FORM COUNTLESS TIMES AND WHAT DO YOU DO??
https://media.tenor.com/o1KXV1XsHtMAAAAM/run-race.gif
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
Who is online
In total there are 2829 users online :: 22 registered, 16 bots, and 2791 guests
Registered users: Vegas, Johnny You, Two If By Tea, Mrkelly, Blackvegetable, Zeets2, Buck Naked, ROG62, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, ConsRule, *GHETTO BLASTER, MR-7, *Beekeeper, jerra b, EDC4ALL!, murdock, LowIQTrash, PhiloBeddo, Sumela, Cedar, nefarious101
Bots: Mail.RU_Bot, DuckDuckBot, Moblie Safari, app.hypefactors.com, TTD-Content, Applebot, ADmantX, YandexBot, proximic, CriteoBot, Mediapartners-Google, semantic-visions.com, linkfluence.com, bingbot, Googlebot, curl/7