Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 14 Mar 2025, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2025, 11:00 am

I do.

You must not.

You don't. 

Which is why you "never" do your own work. 

Ask me why

Wi

Vegas » 14 Mar 2025, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2025, 11:01 am

You don't. 

Which is why you "never" do your own work. 

Ask me why

Wi

You never answer questions...and prove your pic answered the question the first time

Are these your words?

Blackvegetable » 14 Mar 2025, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2025, 11:09 am

Are these your words?

Yes. And? 

 

Odd

Vegas » 14 Mar 2025, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2025, 11:12 am

Yes. And?

Define "never".

Blackvegetable » 14 Mar 2025, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2025, 11:37 am

Define "never".

This again. Broken record. Define it yourself. Do your own work.

I assume this redundancy will last two days now. 

Vegas » 14 Mar 2025, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2025, 11:45 am

This again. Broken record. Define it yourself. Do your own work.

I assume this redundancy will last two days now.

QED.

@Blackvegetable  You know, studies show that highly repetitive people tend to have lower IQs because they struggle with original thought. But hey, keep proving the theory—you're doing a fantastic job as the case study.

Would you like me to show you these studies? They resemble to the letter.  

Blackvegetable » 14 Mar 2025, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2025, 11:47 am

QED.

QED is only used after you have proven something. 

Moron.

 
 

Vegas » 14 Mar 2025, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2025, 11:49 am

QED is only used after you have proven something. 

Moron.

Exactly.
 

Blackvegetable » 14 Mar 2025, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2025, 11:53 am

Exactly.

Yes. So prove something. 

moron. 

Vegas » 14 Mar 2025, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2025, 11:55 am

Yes. So prove something. 

moron.

I already did.

You are a moron who cannot define even the simple words you use.

Nod.
 

Blackvegetable » 14 Mar 2025, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2025, 11:59 am

I already did.

You are a moron who cannot define even the simple words you use.

Nod.

You refuse to do your own work because of: 1 and 13. 

1. Your OP/Claim, your job.
2. I will not entertain your stalking
3. If I am a moron, then you lost 7 times to one, so what does that make you?
4. Hides.
5. Mistake vs Lie/ Prove you answered it the first time/ "not a penny" LIE LIE LIE!
6. **** your questions/demands , or 3k greenies.
7. Biden's survivorship bias skewed the "net" result. 
8. Level 0
9. Still no thoughts
10. Video
11. Hides behind copy/pasted ****. Still no intelligent thoughts.
12. Evades. 
13. Turns it around on others. 
14. Projecting
15. lie

There are more, but this will do for now.

Nod. 

Blackvegetable » 14 Mar 2025, 6:11 am » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2025, 6:11 am

I am one dumb pos.

 

Let's get back to this. you never answered...as if anyone is surprised that you evaded. 

Serious question: do you think your "prove a negative" nonsense is just as brain-dead as your legendary "same-eyes" masterpiece, or are you planning to top yourself with something even dumber?

Vegas » 14 Mar 2025, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2025, 12:02 pm

Let's get back to this. you never answered...as if anyone is surprised that you evaded. 

Serious question: do you think your "prove a negative" nonsense is just as brain-dead as your legendary "same-eyes" masterpiece, or are you planning to top yourself with something even dumber?

Prove I said "same eyes".

Blackvegetable » 14 Mar 2025, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2025, 12:10 pm

Prove I said "same eyes".

   
Nice try...actually it wasn't. Desperate as usual. 

Vegas » 14 Mar 2025, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2025, 12:14 pm

   
Nice try...actually it wasn't. Desperate as usual.

Your rules don't apply to you then.

You're a narcissist.


 

Blackvegetable » 14 Mar 2025, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2025, 12:17 pm

Your rules don't apply to you then.

You're a narcissist.

13, 14

1. Your OP/Claim, your job.
2. I will not entertain your stalking
3. If I am a moron, then you lost 7 times to one, so what does that make you?
4. Hides.
5. Mistake vs Lie/ Prove you answered it the first time/ "not a penny" LIE LIE LIE!
6. **** your questions/demands , or 3k greenies.
7. Biden's survivorship bias skewed the "net" result. 
8. Level 0
9. Still no thoughts
10. Video
11. Hides behind copy/pasted ****. Still no intelligent thoughts.
12. Evades. 
13. Turns it around on others. 
14. Projecting
15. lie

There are more, but this will do for now.

ROG62 » 14 Mar 2025, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2025, 9:36 am

what a **** nutjob...

From all written accounts about her testimony Jean Carroll's actually a pretty great actress....[and so are many other nutjobs too] 

Her wild story has so many inconsistencies that a Judge [who wasn't part of the conspiracy] would have laughed  it out of court.

Did any of the [[[MSM]]] sources report what the entire list of inconsistencies were...?

Of course not.

Thanks to browsing GAB SOCIAL I saw the list of inconsistencies and have reposted it here [over and over] whenever BV gets out of his lane.

Is it any wonder why the [[[JWO]]] have tried on multiple occasions to get GAB shut down...?

The [[[JWO]]] actually DID get GAB shut down until GAB SUPPORTERS made it possible for Andrew Torba to become his own Internet Server [as well as Cyber Warfare Expert]