Liberal Forum

Veghead has blessed this forum with an endless stream of stupidity since 2017, but every once in a while, he outdoes even himself. This past week, he managed to break his own record twice, and I honestly can't decide which moment was dumber.

First, there was his groundbreaking evidence that the infamous drag pic he always posts is actually Trump. His proof? They have the same eyes. That’s it. Case closed. Move over forensic science, Veghead has spoken.

Then, we have his other masterpiece—his belief that proving a negative is totally possible. Anyone with even a passing understanding of logic knows that’s nonsense, but here we are. Funny enough, he claims to have attended Brown University, which at this point, I’m convinced is indisputable proof that he never even made it out of high school.

So, what do you think? Which of these two shining moments of brilliance is dumber? Or are they equally embarrassing? Cast your votes and let’s settle this once and for all.

@Blackvegetable  
 
 

Vegas » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Veghead has blessed this forum with an endless stream of stupidity since 2017, but every once in a while, he outdoes even himself. This past week, he managed to break his own record twice, and I honestly can't decide which moment was dumber.

First, there was his groundbreaking evidence that the infamous drag pic he always posts is actually Trump. His proof? They have the same eyes. That’s it. Case closed. Move over forensic science, Veghead has spoken.

Then, we have his other masterpiece—his belief that proving a negative is totally possible. Anyone with even a passing understanding of logic knows that’s nonsense, but here we are. Funny enough, he claims to have attended Brown University, which at this point, I’m convinced is indisputable proof that he never even made it out of high school.

So, what do you think? Which of these two shining moments of brilliance is dumber? Or are they equally embarrassing? Cast your votes and let’s settle this once and for all.

@Blackvegetable

First, there was his groundbreaking evidence that the infamous drag pic he always posts is actually Trump. His proof? They have the same eyes.

Prove it.

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Prove it.

Back to the same tired trick—never actually say anything, just ask a sneaky question so you can pretend you never made the argument. Hate to break it to you, but nobody’s falling for it. This act is older than your forum account. Maybe switch it up? Try a new dishonest tactic for once. At least put some effort into your deception—recycling the same weak moves is just lazy.


Ask me why narcissists do this. Now!

Vegas » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Back to the same tired trick—never actually say anything, just ask a sneaky question so you can pretend you never made the argument. Hate to break it to you, but nobody’s falling for it. This act is older than your forum account. Maybe switch it up? Try a new dishonest tactic for once. At least put some effort into your deception—recycling the same weak moves is just lazy.

Ask me why narcissists do this. Now!

You're a narcissist...by definition.

And a moron.


 

Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

You're a narcissist...by definition.

And a moron.

3, 13, 14

1. Your OP/Claim, your job.
2. I will not entertain your stalking
3. If I am a moron, then you lost 7 times to one, so what does that make you?
4. Hides.
5. Mistake vs Lie/ Prove you answered it the first time/ "not a penny" LIE LIE LIE!
6. **** your questions/demands , or 3k greenies.
7. Biden's survivorship bias skewed the "net" result. 
8. Level 0
9. Still no thoughts
10. Video
11. Hides behind copy/pasted ****. Still no intelligent thoughts.
12. Evades. 
13. Turns it around on others. 
14. Projecting
15. lie

There are more, but this will do for now.

Vegas » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑

1 minute ago

3, 13, 14

You know, studies show that highly repetitive people tend to have lower IQs because they struggle with original thought. But hey, keep proving the theory—you're doing a fantastic job as the case study.


wi

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

You know, studies show that highly repetitive people tend to have lower IQs because they struggle with original thought. But hey, keep proving the theory—you're doing a fantastic job as the case study.

wi

Yes, that is you. Why do you think I do that list? I am tired of you saying the same **** over and over. It just save me time. 

Veghead is so dumb that he tried to prove a negative and ended up proving himself instead.

Vegas » Today, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 12:13 pm

 Funny enough, he claims to have attended Brown University, which at this point, I’m convinced is indisputable proof that he never even made it out of high school.

@Blackvegetable

I do believe he's a Brown Alumni,  I've seen a magazine picture where he's standing with his back to Roy Cohn and he's wearing his Junior Varsity Jacket with the Brown Starfish mascot on the back of it.

What more proof do you need?
 
 
 

RebelGator » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

I do believe he's a Brown Alumni,  I've seen a magazine picture where he's standing with his back to Roy Cohn and he's wearing his Junior Varsity Jacket with the Brown Starfish mascot on the back of it.

What more proof do you need?

     True. He also could have been the janitor. 

RebelGator » 52 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

52 minutes ago

I do believe he's a Brown Alumni,  I've seen a magazine picture where he's standing with his back to Roy Cohn and he's wearing his Junior Varsity Jacket with the Brown Starfish mascot on the back of it.

What more proof do you need?

The singular is "Alumnus"..


 

Vegas » Today, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 12:20 pm

Back to the same tired trick—never actually say anything, just ask a sneaky question so you can pretend you never made the argument. Hate to break it to you, but nobody’s falling for it. This act is older than your forum account. Maybe switch it up? Try a new dishonest tactic for once. At least put some effort into your deception—recycling the same weak moves is just lazy.

Ask me why narcissists do this. Now!

Heck ya tell em how it is too..

Wait why am I trooling this

Vegas yes a boatload of crap & thank ya 4 sharing too.

I squirted Pepsi outta my nose the other day reading afew posts