Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Alright turd hurdler. Let's do this.
Alright turd hurdler. Let's do this.
By Vegas
1 Apr 2025 3:14 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 Apr 2025 3:14 pm
@Cannonpointer please kindly determine if I adequately supported my argument about the senile pedo's reporting of job creation with respect to gross and net jobs.
If I did, then @Blackvegetable agreed to impale himself with an Olympic grade javelin. He agreed that he would do it in a very slow and agonizing manner. Like 1 cm per hour.
1. Job Creation:
The numbers from the Senile Pedo and the Ho didn't reflect the gross, only the net job creation. Their job creation figure typically reflects net jobs added only. The problem with that is that this figure does not account for jobs that were lost during the same period or workers who exited the labor market entirely. Some industries have experienced significant job losses that are overshadowed by growth in other areas. AI being one example of the growth that overshadowed the loss of manufacturing jobs. However, only the AI jobs were counted, while not accounting for the loss of manufacturing jobs. That's just one example uthat happened under the senile pedo and Ho. A focus on job creation without accounting for the quality or sustainability of these jobs skews the perception of the labor market's true health.
If I did, then @Blackvegetable agreed to impale himself with an Olympic grade javelin. He agreed that he would do it in a very slow and agonizing manner. Like 1 cm per hour.
1. Job Creation:
The numbers from the Senile Pedo and the Ho didn't reflect the gross, only the net job creation. Their job creation figure typically reflects net jobs added only. The problem with that is that this figure does not account for jobs that were lost during the same period or workers who exited the labor market entirely. Some industries have experienced significant job losses that are overshadowed by growth in other areas. AI being one example of the growth that overshadowed the loss of manufacturing jobs. However, only the AI jobs were counted, while not accounting for the loss of manufacturing jobs. That's just one example uthat happened under the senile pedo and Ho. A focus on job creation without accounting for the quality or sustainability of these jobs skews the perception of the labor market's true health.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
1 Apr 2025 7:57 pm
Vegas » Today, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑ @Cannonpointer please kindly determine if I adequately supported my argument about the senile pedo's reporting of job creation with respect to gross and net jobs.
If I did, then @Blackvegetable agreed to impale himself with an Olympic grade javelin. He agreed that he would do it in a very slow and agonizing manner. Like 1 cm per hour.
1. Job Creation:
The numbers from the Senile Pedo and the Ho didn't reflect the gross, only the net job creation. Their job creation figure typically reflects net jobs added only. The problem with that is that this figure does not account for jobs that were lost during the same period or workers who exited the labor market entirely. Some industries have experienced significant job losses that are overshadowed by growth in other areas. AI being one example of the growth that overshadowed the loss of manufacturing jobs. However, only the AI jobs were counted, while not accounting for the loss of manufacturing jobs. That's just one example uthat happened under the senile pedo and Ho. A focus on job creation without accounting for the quality or sustainability of these jobs skews the perception of the labor market's true health.
Karen asking for the manager again
1 Apr 2025 8:36 pm
That's basic, 101 ****. In other words, way over his head.Vegas » Today, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑ @Cannonpointer please kindly determine if I adequately supported my argument about the senile pedo's reporting of job creation with respect to gross and net jobs.
If I did, then @Blackvegetable agreed to impale himself with an Olympic grade javelin. He agreed that he would do it in a very slow and agonizing manner. Like 1 cm per hour.
1. Job Creation:
The numbers from the Senile Pedo and the Ho didn't reflect the gross, only the net job creation. Their job creation figure typically reflects net jobs added only. The problem with that is that this figure does not account for jobs that were lost during the same period or workers who exited the labor market entirely. Some industries have experienced significant job losses that are overshadowed by growth in other areas. AI being one example of the growth that overshadowed the loss of manufacturing jobs. However, only the AI jobs were counted, while not accounting for the loss of manufacturing jobs. That's just one example uthat happened under the senile pedo and Ho. A focus on job creation without accounting for the quality or sustainability of these jobs skews the perception of the labor market's true health.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
1 Apr 2025 8:58 pm
Cannonpointer » 26 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ That's basic, 101 ****. In other words, way over his head.
@Blackvegetable Cannon has voted for me. Now go impale yourself. Live stream it for all of us to enjoy. I have beer and popcorn.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
Yesterday 4:22 am
Vegas » Yesterday, 8:58 pm » wrote: ↑ @Blackvegetable Cannon has voted for me. Now go impale yourself. Live stream it for all of us to enjoy. I have beer and popcorn.
How does anyone get real numbers out the shytbox we have for leadership?
The numbers will never lie, people do. We are provided selective availability of accuracy.
I could try and find real data on jobs, but anything either of us find we would never accept the opposing sources we are offerred.
The disinformation is bipartisan. IMO Trump embraces it as a weapon of choice.
We really need to face the truth, but America can't handle the truth and I am dead certain it does not get shared.
Yesterday 5:30 am
"LOOK AT ME!!!!! DON'T PAY ANY ATTENTION TO THAT NARCISSIST!"
**** pathological.
Yesterday 5:33 am
He's an idiot...Vegas » Yesterday, 8:58 pm » wrote: ↑ @Blackvegetable Cannon has voted for me. Now go impale yourself. Live stream it for all of us to enjoy. I have beer and popcorn.
Yesterday 5:34 am
Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 8:36 pm » wrote: ↑ That's basic, 101 ****. In other words, way over his head.
it's **** gibberish.
Yesterday 5:38 am
Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 8:36 pm » wrote: ↑ That's basic, 101 ****. In other words, way over his head.
JuCo 5 percenter...
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime”
LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened."
brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
Yesterday 5:41 am
The Administration does not collect, adjust or revise employment data.JohnnyYou » Today, 4:22 am » wrote: ↑ How does anyone get real numbers out the shytbox we have for leadership?
The numbers will never lie, people do. We are provided selective availability of accuracy.
I could try and find real data on jobs, but anything either of us find we would never accept the opposing sources we are offerred.
The disinformation is bipartisan. IMO Trump embraces it as a weapon of choice.
We really need to face the truth, but America can't handle the truth and I am dead certain it does not get shared.
That is done by career employees at BLS, utilizing methodologies which are transparent and largely unchanged since the 1990s.
The only thing "wrong" with the numbers is that GOP administrations have generated net private payroll LOSSES since 2000.
Yesterday 5:41 am
ya, joe would post it all bravado like...then alas, later in the month the real downgraded numbers would come out like clockwork...JohnnyYou » Today, 4:22 am » wrote: ↑ How does anyone get real numbers out the shytbox we have for leadership?
The numbers will never lie, people do. We are provided selective availability of accuracy.
I could try and find real data on jobs, but anything either of us find we would never accept the opposing sources we are offerred.
The disinformation is bipartisan. IMO Trump embraces it as a weapon of choice.
We really need to face the truth, but America can't handle the truth and I am dead certain it does not get shared.
JuCo 5 percenter...
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime”
LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened."
brown's unheeded words of wisdom
Yesterday 5:43 am
What's the difference between the establishment and household surveys?
Yesterday 6:05 am
Face it...you preferred the candidate who's major political accomplishment was giving head to Willy the Negro. By default, your choice of qualifications indicates you value cock-gobbling.....end of discussion.JohnnyYou » Today, 4:22 am » wrote: ↑ How does anyone get real numbers out the shytbox we have for leadership?
The numbers will never lie, people do. We are provided selective availability of accuracy.
I could try and find real data on jobs, but anything either of us find we would never accept the opposing sources we are offerred.
The disinformation is bipartisan. IMO Trump embraces it as a weapon of choice.
We really need to face the truth, but America can't handle the truth and I am dead certain it does not get shared.
Yesterday 7:16 am
captard deflecto, focus...Blackvegetable » Today, 5:43 am » wrote: ↑ What's the difference between the establishment and household surveys?
JuCo 5 percenter...
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime”
LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened."
brown's unheeded words of wisdom
Yesterday 7:20 am
Vegas » Yesterday, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑ @Cannonpointer please kindly determine if I adequately supported my argument about the senile pedo's reporting of job creation with respect to gross and net jobs.
If I did, then @Blackvegetable agreed to impale himself with an Olympic grade javelin. He agreed that he would do it in a very slow and agonizing manner. Like 1 cm per hour.
1. Job Creation:
The numbers from the Senile Pedo and the Ho didn't reflect the gross, only the net job creation. Their job creation figure typically reflects net jobs added only. The problem with that is that this figure does not account for jobs that were lost during the same period or workers who exited the labor market entirely. Some industries have experienced significant job losses that are overshadowed by growth in other areas. AI being one example of the growth that overshadowed the loss of manufacturing jobs. However, only the AI jobs were counted, while not accounting for the loss of manufacturing jobs. That's just one example uthat happened under the senile pedo and Ho. A focus on job creation without accounting for the quality or sustainability of these jobs skews the perception of the labor market's true health.
That's the way both surveys work. And have for decades. A change in administrations doesn't change the methodologies.The numbers from the Senile Pedo and the Ho didn't reflect the gross, only the net job creation.
Both ask respondents for status at a point in time...it is binary - you are either employed (under the definitions of each of the two surveys), or you are not.
The number is then compared with that from the previous period.
There's little statistical value in a gross number of jobs "created"...the value is in the number of people employed.
It's not "theirs"....it's BLS's.Their job creation figure typically reflects net jobs added only.
Of course it does, you dumb ****...it is why it is "NET".The problem with that is that this figure does not account for jobs that were lost during the same period
Cretin.
@Cannonpointer
Yesterday 7:22 am
Stop acting as if you have any idea what's relevant, JuCo..
Yesterday 7:23 am
You lose againBlackvegetable » Today, 5:30 am » wrote: ↑ "LOOK AT ME!!!!! DON'T PAY ANY ATTENTION TO THAT NARCISSIST!"
**** pathological.
Yesterday 7:39 am
Captard Deflecto, focus...Blackvegetable » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Stop acting as if you have any idea what's relevant, JuCo..
JuCo 5 percenter...
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime”
LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened."
brown's unheeded words of wisdom
Yesterday 7:43 am
Yesterday 7:58 am
Who is online
In total there are 2451 users online :: 17 registered, 14 bots, and 2420 guests
Registered users: Vegas, Johnny You, Mrkelly, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, ROG62, ConservativeWave, *GHETTO BLASTER, FJB, *Beekeeper, jerra b, murdock, Cannonpointer, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, *Huey, PoliticalPopUp
Bots: CriteoBot, curl/7, YandexBot, DuckDuckBot, proximic, app.hypefactors.com, Applebot, Mediapartners-Google, facebookexternalhit, ADmantX, semantic-visions.com, linkfluence.com, Googlebot, bingbot