Liberal Forum

@Cannonpointer  please kindly determine if I adequately supported my argument about the senile pedo's reporting of job creation with respect to gross and net jobs. 

If I did, then @Blackvegetable  agreed to impale himself with an Olympic grade javelin. He agreed that he would do it in a very slow and agonizing manner. Like 1 cm per hour. 


1. Job Creation: 
The numbers from the Senile Pedo and the Ho didn't reflect the gross, only the net job creation. Their job creation figure typically reflects net jobs added only. The problem with that is that this figure does not account for jobs that were lost during the same period or workers who exited the labor market entirely. Some industries have experienced significant job losses that are overshadowed by growth in other areas. AI being one example of the growth that overshadowed the loss of manufacturing jobs. However, only the AI jobs were counted, while not accounting for the loss of manufacturing jobs.  That's just one example uthat happened under the senile pedo and Ho. A focus on job creation without accounting for the quality or sustainability of these jobs skews the perception of the labor market's true health.

Vegas » Today, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:14 pm

@Cannonpointer  please kindly determine if I adequately supported my argument about the senile pedo's reporting of job creation with respect to gross and net jobs. 

If I did, then @Blackvegetable  agreed to impale himself with an Olympic grade javelin. He agreed that he would do it in a very slow and agonizing manner. Like 1 cm per hour. 

1. Job Creation: 
The numbers from the Senile Pedo and the Ho didn't reflect the gross, only the net job creation. Their job creation figure typically reflects net jobs added only. The problem with that is that this figure does not account for jobs that were lost during the same period or workers who exited the labor market entirely. Some industries have experienced significant job losses that are overshadowed by growth in other areas. AI being one example of the growth that overshadowed the loss of manufacturing jobs. However, only the AI jobs were counted, while not accounting for the loss of manufacturing jobs.  That's just one example uthat happened under the senile pedo and Ho. A focus on job creation without accounting for the quality or sustainability of these jobs skews the perception of the labor market's true health.

  Karen asking for the manager   

again   
 

Vegas » Today, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:14 pm

@Cannonpointer  please kindly determine if I adequately supported my argument about the senile pedo's reporting of job creation with respect to gross and net jobs. 

If I did, then @Blackvegetable  agreed to impale himself with an Olympic grade javelin. He agreed that he would do it in a very slow and agonizing manner. Like 1 cm per hour. 

1. Job Creation: 
The numbers from the Senile Pedo and the Ho didn't reflect the gross, only the net job creation. Their job creation figure typically reflects net jobs added only. The problem with that is that this figure does not account for jobs that were lost during the same period or workers who exited the labor market entirely. Some industries have experienced significant job losses that are overshadowed by growth in other areas. AI being one example of the growth that overshadowed the loss of manufacturing jobs. However, only the AI jobs were counted, while not accounting for the loss of manufacturing jobs.  That's just one example uthat happened under the senile pedo and Ho. A focus on job creation without accounting for the quality or sustainability of these jobs skews the perception of the labor market's true health.

That's basic, 101 ****. In other words, way over his head.
 

Cannonpointer » 26 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

26 minutes ago

That's basic, 101 ****. In other words, way over his head.

@Blackvegetable  Cannon has voted for me. Now go impale yourself. Live stream it for all of us to enjoy. I have beer and popcorn.

Vegas » Yesterday, 8:58 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:58 pm

@Blackvegetable  Cannon has voted for me. Now go impale yourself. Live stream it for all of us to enjoy. I have beer and popcorn.

How does anyone get real numbers out the shytbox we have for leadership?
The numbers will never lie, people do.  We are provided selective availability of accuracy.

I could try and find real data on jobs, but anything either of us find we would never accept the opposing sources we are offerred.

The disinformation is bipartisan. IMO Trump embraces it as a weapon of choice. 

We really need to face the truth, but America can't handle the truth and I am dead certain it does not get shared.

Mrkelly » Yesterday, 7:57 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 7:57 pm

  Karen asking for the manager   

again 

"LOOK AT ME!!!!! DON'T PAY ANY ATTENTION TO THAT NARCISSIST!"

**** pathological.

Vegas » Yesterday, 8:58 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:58 pm

@Blackvegetable  Cannon has voted for me. Now go impale yourself. Live stream it for all of us to enjoy. I have beer and popcorn.

He's an idiot...

Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 8:36 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:36 pm

That's basic, 101 ****. In other words, way over his head.

it's **** gibberish. 

Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 8:36 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:36 pm

That's basic, 101 ****. In other words, way over his head.

 

JohnnyYou » Today, 4:22 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 4:22 am

How does anyone get real numbers out the shytbox we have for leadership?
The numbers will never lie, people do.  We are provided selective availability of accuracy.

I could try and find real data on jobs, but anything either of us find we would never accept the opposing sources we are offerred.

The disinformation is bipartisan. IMO Trump embraces it as a weapon of choice. 

We really need to face the truth, but America can't handle the truth and I am dead certain it does not get shared.

The Administration does not collect, adjust or revise employment data.

That is done by career employees at BLS, utilizing methodologies which are transparent and largely unchanged since the 1990s.

The only thing "wrong" with the numbers is that GOP administrations have generated net private payroll LOSSES since 2000.




 

JohnnyYou » Today, 4:22 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 4:22 am

How does anyone get real numbers out the shytbox we have for leadership?
The numbers will never lie, people do.  We are provided selective availability of accuracy.

I could try and find real data on jobs, but anything either of us find we would never accept the opposing sources we are offerred.

The disinformation is bipartisan. IMO Trump embraces it as a weapon of choice. 

We really need to face the truth, but America can't handle the truth and I am dead certain it does not get shared.

ya, joe would post it all bravado like...then alas, later in the month the real downgraded numbers would come out like clockwork...  
 

ROG62 » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

What's the difference between the establishment and household surveys?
 

JohnnyYou » Today, 4:22 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 4:22 am

How does anyone get real numbers out the shytbox we have for leadership?
The numbers will never lie, people do.  We are provided selective availability of accuracy.

I could try and find real data on jobs, but anything either of us find we would never accept the opposing sources we are offerred.

The disinformation is bipartisan. IMO Trump embraces it as a weapon of choice. 

We really need to face the truth, but America can't handle the truth and I am dead certain it does not get shared.

Face it...you preferred the candidate who's major political accomplishment was giving head to Willy the Negro. By default, your choice of qualifications indicates you value cock-gobbling.....end of discussion. 

Blackvegetable » Today, 5:43 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:43 am

What's the difference between the establishment and household surveys?

captard deflecto, focus...


 

Vegas » Yesterday, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 3:14 pm

@Cannonpointer  please kindly determine if I adequately supported my argument about the senile pedo's reporting of job creation with respect to gross and net jobs. 

If I did, then @Blackvegetable  agreed to impale himself with an Olympic grade javelin. He agreed that he would do it in a very slow and agonizing manner. Like 1 cm per hour. 

1. Job Creation: 
The numbers from the Senile Pedo and the Ho didn't reflect the gross, only the net job creation. Their job creation figure typically reflects net jobs added only. The problem with that is that this figure does not account for jobs that were lost during the same period or workers who exited the labor market entirely. Some industries have experienced significant job losses that are overshadowed by growth in other areas. AI being one example of the growth that overshadowed the loss of manufacturing jobs. However, only the AI jobs were counted, while not accounting for the loss of manufacturing jobs.  That's just one example uthat happened under the senile pedo and Ho. A focus on job creation without accounting for the quality or sustainability of these jobs skews the perception of the labor market's true health.

 

The numbers from the Senile Pedo and the Ho didn't reflect the gross, only the net job creation.

That's the way both surveys work. And have for decades. A change in administrations doesn't change the methodologies.

Both ask respondents for status at a point in time...it is binary - you are either employed (under the definitions of each of the two surveys), or you are not.

The number is then compared with that from the previous period.

There's little statistical value in a gross number of jobs "created"...the value is in the number of people employed.

Their job creation figure typically reflects net jobs added only.

It's not "theirs"....it's BLS's.

The problem with that is that this figure does not account for jobs that were lost during the same period

Of course it does, you dumb ****...it is why it is "NET".

Cretin.

@Cannonpointer  
 

ROG62 » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

captard deflecto, focus...

Stop acting as if you have any idea what's relevant, JuCo..

 

Blackvegetable » Today, 5:30 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:30 am

"LOOK AT ME!!!!! DON'T PAY ANY ATTENTION TO THAT NARCISSIST!"

**** pathological.

You lose again

Blackvegetable » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

19 minutes ago

Stop acting as if you have any idea what's relevant, JuCo..

Captard Deflecto, focus...
 

ROG62 » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Captard Deflecto, focus...

RunnyJuCo, please...

BV is running again