No, it can't..Vegas » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑![]()
The same question can be applied to you. But we both know you only ask, you don't answer..the first time.
Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ No, it can't..
I'm just pissing on the embers in your ashes..
Opaque, ***.Blackvegetable » Today, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑ I trust you.
See?
That's working to find common ground....in spite of your deplorable, and entirely self inflicted, condition.
Now that trust isn't extended willy nilly..it must be earned anew with each "vocalization".
Clear?
Mitch McConnell can't throw turds any more.. They are wet in his diaper.
There is an even bigger issue that no numbers collected address, and that is the fact that America has a mostly fiscal economy, whereas the chinee have a physical economy. We have a physical economy, as well - more so than many believe. But it's nothing next to Chyna's. So how many jobs there are is not so important as what the people in those jobs are doing.Vegas » Today, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑ Idiot. Perfect, you finally address something, and what do you do? Offer a generic textbook summary of how BLS surveys work, like that somehow refutes my point. As always, you dodge the substance of my argument while pretending to have delivered a mic drop.
@Cannonpointer , time to school this piece of **** again.
Thanks for the Wikipedia summary, Veghead, but you’re completely missing the point, probably on purpose. Nobody’s arguing about how the BLS collects data. We all know it’s been done the same way for decades. The issue, which you conveniently sidestepped as usual, is how those net numbers are framed and weaponized politically to sell a narrative that doesn’t reflect the full reality.
When you say there's “little statistical value” in gross jobs created or lost, you're basically admitting you don’t care about the actual labor churn—just the surface-level number. That’s fine for a lazy talking point, but useless for evaluating real economic health. Job losses in critical sectors, people exiting the workforce, and the quality or sustainability of new jobs? All conveniently erased from the picture so long as the “net” is positive.So no, Veghead, parroting the methodology doesn’t refute the criticism. It just confirms you’re more interested in regurgitating process than actually analyzing impact. Try harder.
No go impale yourself like you promised.
Hey, work that out with your hero McConnel. He votes your foreign policy down the line, fruitcake.JohnnyYou » 21 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Mitch McConnell can't throw turds any more.. They are wet in his diaper.
McTurdull the Turd with the KY Jelly. Sucked tons of Federal Tit out of our pockets to make Kentucky great again.
They are phooked losing Canadian Bourbon Sales,.
As usual, retard ****.JohnnyYou » 21 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Mitch McConnell can't throw turds any more.. They are wet in his diaper.
McTurdull the Turd with the KY Jelly. Sucked tons of Federal Tit out of our pockets to make Kentucky great again.
They are phooked losing Canadian Bourbon Sales,.
And he, Rand Paul, Murkowski, and Susan Collins told Trump to shove his tariffs up his azz yesterday. It's glorious!Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 6:57 pm » wrote: ↑ Hey, work that out with your hero McConnel. He votes your foreign policy down the line, fruitcake.
We'll see how that works out for them. The people you are talking about routinely cast what are called "protest votes."JohnnyYou » Today, 4:17 am » wrote: ↑ And he, Rand Paul, Murkowski, and Susan Collins told Trump to shove his tariffs up his azz yesterday. It's glorious!
You phook with American Bourbon people are going to get pissed.
Cannonpointer » Today, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑ We'll see how that works out for them. The people you are talking about routinely cast what are called "protest votes."
The senate is pretty safe. I think you would need three refuseniks to get a tie - and Vance would break the tie. So you would need those three to stay strong - which is easy to do, when you're just posturing and your vote is not needed, - and then you would need another to join the coalition.
Good luck.
Looks pretty meaningless to me.
Or, two bounces before the Reality sets in.Cannonpointer » 39 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Looks pretty meaningless to me.
As I understand it, 401k accounts are generally held for more than a few month.
I could use that chart to make a PRO-Trump argument. There's the bump after election and the bump after renauguration.
Exactly. A chart that short about a long term investment is a cypher.
The Yankees used to have a Japanese pitcher named Hiroshima Nagasaki.Vegas » Yesterday, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑ @Blackvegetable I am the Enola Gay, and you are at ground zero in Hiroshima here: