today's futures look rough...but it's not like they didn't know, right?ConservativeWave » Yesterday, 8:36 pm » wrote: ↑ NOW.. that's not to say the market might still not decline... but TODAY, the day the markets COULD have shown America what they thought about "Tariffs"... after being driven down in the pre-Market with FAKE money... the stock market RALLIED over 800 points from the bottom !! ENOUGH SAID !!
AND THEN, Janet Yellen came out and ADMITTED... Tariffs probably WOULD NOT cause price increases ! ...AND WHY? BECAUSE America companies will QUICKLY fill the void... and AMERICANS will quickly learn to BUY American, and there will BE NO price increases !
THAT is the TRUTH !!
ROG62 » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ today's futures look rough...but it's not like they didn't know, right?
ConservativeWave » Yesterday, 8:36 pm » wrote: ↑ NOW.. that's not to say the market might still not decline... but TODAY, the day the markets COULD have shown America what they thought about "Tariffs"... after being driven down in the pre-Market with FAKE money... the stock market RALLIED over 800 points from the bottom !! ENOUGH SAID !!
AND THEN, Janet Yellen came out and ADMITTED... Tariffs probably WOULD NOT cause price increases ! ...AND WHY? BECAUSE America companies will QUICKLY fill the void... and AMERICANS will quickly learn to BUY American, and there will BE NO price increases !
THAT is the TRUTH !!
No pain, no gain....but look on the bright side, if Berkshire Hathaway drops to a penny stock, you could buy a few shares....if you borrowed a nickel.Mrkelly » 30 minutes ago » wrote: ↑Stock market today: S&P 500, Nasdaq set to tank, Dow to drop over 1,000 points as Trump's tariffs rip through markets worldwide
today
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/live/sto ... 57448.html
Mrkelly » 55 minutes ago » wrote: ↑Stock market today: S&P 500, Nasdaq set to tank, Dow to drop over 1,000 points as Trump's tariffs rip through markets worldwide
today
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/live/sto ... 57448.html
*Beekeeper » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ We know. You LWNJs LOVE your elites and them losing money in the market is devistation.
But AMERICAN WORKERS having a more level playing field against CHEAP SLAVE LABOR is a BIG NO-NO for your side to support.
Tell us, what will you be saying when the MARKETS COME ROARING BACK when AMERICAN FACTORIES all over start to reopen, manufacturing in this nation is on WIDE OPEN THROTTLE, and once again, you see AMERICAN MADE EVERYTHING in every store and far less of the slave labor made crap??
Mrkelly » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑American worker are gonna take it up the ***
for the tRump bump in the road![]()
Fox News’ Harris Faulkner torched over ‘ridiculous’ demand that ‘401(k) people’ treat Trump’s tariffs like ‘war effort’
https://www.yahoo.com/news/fox-news-har ... 41448.html
*Beekeeper » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Gee, that's funny.
You NEVER SAW the number of AMERICAN WORKERS at the announcement and signing of the Tariffs yesterday now did you??
Sucks for you that your "media sources" never show your MANIPULATED LWNJ *** any of those things, huh??
Can you define "autarky" and provide an existing example?*Beekeeper » Today, 6:31 am » wrote: ↑ The STUPIDITY of "investors" on how these tariffs will actually benefit American companies is astounding.
Once they realize that American factories will soon be producing goods that used to be produced in slave labor nations, the buying will begin. Because you can rest assured that much if not all of our former manufacturing self WILL be restored. Things like textiles, components for ALL things being assembled here like appliances, automobiles, and other "hard goods". That level of competition will also bring down prices and tell China, Indonesia, and other pacific rim nations to "go **** yourself". It ALSO makes the US of A much more secure in not relying on someone else to get things we need here when needed. Like computer chips, electronics, etc.
Add to this, the AMERICAN WORKERS understand that this not just preserves their jobs from be shipped overseas, but WILL open doors for more top paying jobs in pretty much ALL sectors of society.
STFU YOU CANT EVEN DEFINE THE TERM WOMAN
Mrkelly » 27 minutes ago » wrote: ↑American worker are gonna take it up the ***
for the tRump bump in the road![]()
Fox News’ Harris Faulkner torched over ‘ridiculous’ demand that ‘401(k) people’ treat Trump’s tariffs like ‘war effort’
https://www.yahoo.com/news/fox-news-har ... 41448.html
S&P futures down 3.75%ConservativeWave » Yesterday, 8:36 pm » wrote: ↑ NOW.. that's not to say the market might still not decline... but TODAY, the day the markets COULD have shown America what they thought about "Tariffs"... after being driven down in the pre-Market with FAKE money... the stock market RALLIED over 800 points from the bottom !! ENOUGH SAID !!
AND THEN, Janet Yellen came out and ADMITTED... Tariffs probably WOULD NOT cause price increases ! ...AND WHY? BECAUSE America companies will QUICKLY fill the void... and AMERICANS will quickly learn to BUY American, and there will BE NO price increases !
THAT is the TRUTH !!
Stop.*Beekeeper » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Who "torched" her?? More of your LWNJ "commentators"??
The AMERICAN WORKER understands that this means FAR MORE DOWN THE ROAD than a stock market bump. Besides, this will OPEN THE DOOR for more investors to get in when prices are down and good investments with tons of growth happen to bring REAL WEALTH to Americans.
Funny how you IDIOTS don't seem to understand that you BUY LOW and SELL HIGH. But now, the IDIOT CLASS is selling on a downswing and that only shows utter STUPIDITY, not anything else. "Reaction" to tariffs is FAR MORE STUPID to be selling that it would be to be BUYING NOW.
viewtopic.php?p=2724665#p2724665Blackvegetable » 36 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Stop.
Post your academic and/or professional background in economics..
A brief outline will do.
EAT **** and CHOKE ON YOUR OWN WORDS!!Do your own **** work, imbecile.
Blackvegetable » 41 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Stop.
Post your academic and/or professional background in economics..
A brief outline will do.
Blackvegetable » 45 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Can you define "autarky" and provide an existing example?
viewtopic.php?p=2724665#p2724665Do your own **** work, imbecile.
Mrkelly » 56 minutes ago » wrote: ↑you are impressed with tRump being able to wrangle up some loyalists?