Liberal Forum

It's awaiting approval from Trump and congress. This is my formal prediction. I don't know if all Repubs are going to back this. However, I predict that not one dimocrat will vote for it. Not a single one. They won't because it's Trump/Musk. They have zero concern for Americans. Their hatred for Trump/Musk far outweighs any desire to support Americans. 

You heard it here first. 


Elon Musk: $5000 DOGE Checks await Trump's and Congress's approval

Vegas » Today, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 2:30 pm

It's awaiting approval from Trump and congress. This is my formal prediction. I don't know if all Repubs are going to back this. However, I predict that not one dimocrat will vote for it. Not a single one. They won't because it's Trump/Musk. They have zero concern for Americans. Their hatred for Trump/Musk far outweighs any desire to support Americans. 

You heard it here first. 

Elon Musk: $5000 DOGE Checks await Trump's and Congress's approval

Where is the 5k coming from?

Blackvegetable » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑

1 minute ago

Where is the 5k coming from?

They've pimped your mother out on Pennsylvania Ave. It's all quarters but it still spends.

murdock » 45 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

45 minutes ago

They've pimped your mother out on Pennsylvania Ave. It's all quarters but it still spends.

 

Blackvegetable » Today, 5:29 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:29 pm

Where is the 5k coming from?

Everyone knows where it's coming from you stupid pos. 20% of the savings from DOGE's cuts. 

Did you seriously not know that or do you just enjoy embarrassing yourself?

Vegas » Today, 6:36 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:36 pm

Everyone knows where it's coming from you stupid pos. 20% of the savings from DOGE's cuts. 

Did you seriously not know that or do you just enjoy embarrassing yourself?

I see..

Given that assumption, can you calculate the savings necessary to cover 150 million $5,000 checks?
 

Blackvegetable » 30 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

30 minutes ago

I see..

Given that assumption, can you calculate the savings necessary to cover 150 million $5,000 checks?

YOU DON'T GET TO ASK QUESTIONS ***
 

Vegas » Today, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 2:30 pm

It's awaiting approval from Trump and congress. This is my formal prediction. I don't know if all Repubs are going to back this. However, I predict that not one dimocrat will vote for it. Not a single one. They won't because it's Trump/Musk. They have zero concern for Americans. Their hatred for Trump/Musk far outweighs any desire to support Americans. 

You heard it here first. 

Elon Musk: $5000 DOGE Checks await Trump's and Congress's approval

So ironic that the majority of the Libtard Losers who hate DOGE the most lack the integrity to refuse to accept any of the "Ill Gotten Gains" that DOGE returns to We The People/
Do you think we will ever see a wave of "street level Libtards" with enough integrity to prove me wrong...?
There used to be stories about Americans who qualified for Public Assistance but were too proud to accept it.
We wont see any of that from OUR WORST GENERATION OF DRUG ADDLED AND EFFEMINATELY RAISED  LIBTARD LEMMINGS

Blackvegetable » Today, 7:43 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:43 pm

I see..

Given that assumption, can you calculate the savings necessary to cover 150 million $5,000 checks?

Well Veghead. Let's do some 3rd grade math that maybe even you can understand. In 2023, there were approximately 163 million taxpayers. (1.63 x 10^11) x (5 x 10^3) = 8.15 x 10^12. 

That is 815 billion dollars. Given that they are estimating 2 trillion in savings, then .20 x 2 trillion = 400 billion. Sooooo.....yeah, it looks like it covers it all just fine. 

Blackvegetable » Today, 7:43 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:43 pm

I see..

Given that assumption, can you calculate the savings necessary to cover 150 million $5,000 checks?

So just to be clear, you are demanding answers to your question about my OP, but you refuse to answer even one of my questions about yours. 

Don't you ever **** accuse me of the rules not applying to me ever again. You hypocritical narcissistic scumbag. 

Vegas » Today, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 2:30 pm

It's awaiting approval from Trump and congress. This is my formal prediction. I don't know if all Repubs are going to back this. However, I predict that not one dimocrat will vote for it. Not a single one. They won't because it's Trump/Musk. They have zero concern for Americans. Their hatred for Trump/Musk far outweighs any desire to support Americans. 

You heard it here first. 

Elon Musk: $5000 DOGE Checks await Trump's and Congress's approval

I think the ****** will chimp out if they can't figure out a way to be given twice as much as everyone else.     
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

I think the ****** will chimp out if they can't figure out a way to be given twice as much as everyone else.   

I think the libturds that complain the most about DOGE will be the very first ones most eager to receive it. 

FJB » Today, 8:11 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:11 pm

YOU DON'T GET TO ASK QUESTIONS ***

He has yet to answer even one of my questions regarding his OPs. Yet, as always, here he is demanding answers to his questions. God he is such a hypocrite. A useless pos.

Vegas » Today, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 2:30 pm

It's awaiting approval from Trump and congress. This is my formal prediction. I don't know if all Repubs are going to back this. However, I predict that not one dimocrat will vote for it. Not a single one. They won't because it's Trump/Musk. They have zero concern for Americans. Their hatred for Trump/Musk far outweighs any desire to support Americans. 

You heard it here first. 

Elon Musk: $5000 DOGE Checks await Trump's and Congress's approval

Incorrect. 

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ ... rtrait.jpg

Blackvegetable » Today, 7:43 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:43 pm

I see..

Given that assumption, can you calculate the savings necessary to cover 150 million $5,000 checks?

The assumption that EVERYONE will get a check is based on no argument - so I need make no argument against it in order to offer a counter-assumption, likewise based. 

I assume that only those who paid net federal taxes will get the check. In 2024, the top 50 percent of all taxpayers paid 97 percent of all federal individual income taxes, while the bottom 50 percent paid the remaining 3 percent. So I am going to cut your figure in half. And that's being generous, IMO. There will likely be all kinds of exclusions applied to bring the number of recipients even lower. 

Remember, this is a REPUBLICAN giveaway. They treat free federal money like women treat ******. The first rule of free ****, for Republicans, is that you can only have it if you don't need it. But let's stick with 50%. Let's use 80 million, because your 150 million is a bit low. 

80,000,000 x 5= 400,000,000. Times a thousand = 400 Billion. That is 20% of 2 Trillion - the amount that you are supposed to believe DOGE is saving us. 

As concerned as Republicans are about social security, one would think they might put that money into fixing it. But you see, money is like ****** to a Republican. If you need it, you can't have it. 

*GHETTOBLASTER » Today, 10:32 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:32 pm

I think the ****** will chimp out if they can't figure out a way to be given twice as much as everyone else.   

The ****** who chimp out will not be getting ANY money. Only the ones who don't need it and won't notice it will get it. 
 

Vegas » Today, 10:35 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:35 pm

I think the libturds that complain the most about DOGE will be the very first ones most eager to receive it.

Dis be me when dey hannout dem checks.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pfbNIb2-0ks
 
 

Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 11:39 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:39 pm

The ****** who chimp out will not be getting ANY money. Only the ones who don't need it and won't notice it will get it.

That would be too funny if Trump makes an announcement  to The ****** on national TV that they have already received their DOGE REFUNDS in the form of all of the preferential treatment and special "GIBS ME DAT" programs that they have already cashed in on over the years.
Programs like Apefirmative Action hiring,  College SAT BONUS Admissions and Section Ape Housing, [plus their generalized hatred of DOGE] disqualify them from getting their banana grabbers on any mo' "GIBS".      
Then watch the massive chimp outs commence.      
 

Vegas » Yesterday, 10:23 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:23 pm

So everyone knows I am entirely innumerate....dumber than a sack of ****.
It's my OP, but I'm just carrying the water.

I should kill myself.
 

Self awareness, there is thy sting.


 

Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 11:36 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:36 pm

The assumption that EVERYONE will get a check is based on no argument - so I need make no argument against it in order to offer a counter-assumption, likewise based. 

I assume that only those who paid net federal taxes will get the check. In 2024, the top 50 percent of all taxpayers paid 97 percent of all federal individual income taxes, while the bottom 50 percent paid the remaining 3 percent. So I am going to cut your figure in half. And that's being generous, IMO. There will likely be all kinds of exclusions applied to bring the number of recipients even lower. 

Remember, this is a REPUBLICAN giveaway. They treat free federal money like women treat ******. The first rule of free ****, for Republicans, is that you can only have it if you don't need it. But let's stick with 50%. Let's use 80 million, because your 150 million is a bit low. 

80,000,000 x 5= 400,000,000. Times a thousand = 400 Billion. That is 20% of 2 Trillion - the amount that you are supposed to believe DOGE is saving us. 

As concerned as Republicans are about social security, one would think they might put that money into fixing it. But you see, money is like ****** to a Republican. If you need it, you can't have it.

The assumption that EVERYONE will get a check is based on no argument - so I need make no argument against it in order to offer a counter-assumption, likewise based

Stop here.

You're a **** idiot.

The IRS processed 164,997,000 individual tax returns in 2022, and 166,898,000 individual tax returns in 2021