Liberal Forum

Republicans are weighing the creation of a new bracket for those earning $1 million or more to offset some of the costs of their tax bill, a stark departure from decades of GOP opposition to tax increases, according to people familiar with the matter.

Republicans Debate Hiking Top Tax Rate to 40% for Millionaires


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... llionaires


It's tough to make heads or tails of this Golden Age of Tax Cuts and cheap eggs...

Blackvegetable » 04 Apr 2025, 8:14 am » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2025, 8:14 am

Republicans are weighing the creation of a new bracket for those earning $1 million or more to offset some of the costs of their tax bill, a stark departure from decades of GOP opposition to tax increases, according to people familiar with the matter.

Republicans Debate Hiking Top Tax Rate to 40% for Millionaires

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... llionaires

It's tough to make heads or tails of this Golden Age of Tax Cuts and cheap eggs...

Old news.  At least a week old:


Scoop: Trump might let taxes rise for the rich to cover breaks on tips


https://www.axios.com/2025/03/28/trump-taxes-wealthy
 
 

Let’s go get it passed and lower the deficit

*Huey » 04 Apr 2025, 8:18 am » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2025, 8:18 am

Old news.  At least a week old:

Scoop: Trump might let taxes rise for the rich to cover breaks on tips

https://www.axios.com/2025/03/28/trump-taxes-wealthy

Do you have a point?

BuckNaked » 04 Apr 2025, 8:19 am » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2025, 8:19 am

Let’s go get it passed and lower the deficit

KLAS WURFIR!

Blackvegetable » 04 Apr 2025, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2025, 8:22 am

KLAS WURFIR!

and make them permanent 

BuckNaked » 04 Apr 2025, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2025, 8:23 am

and make them permanent

While Grifty cuts staff and funding at the IRS...


 

Blackvegetable » 04 Apr 2025, 8:28 am » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2025, 8:28 am

While Grifty cuts staff and funding at the IRS...

So?

BuckNaked » 04 Apr 2025, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2025, 8:29 am

So?

Good MAGAt!

Blackvegetable » 04 Apr 2025, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2025, 8:21 am

Do you have a point?

 

Sure.  If you spent less time hijacking topics and playing gotcha and more time paying attention to current events you would known this.  
 

Blackvegetable » 04 Apr 2025, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2025, 8:33 am

Good MAGAt!

MAHA

*Huey » 04 Apr 2025, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2025, 8:41 am

Sure.  If you spent less time hijacking topics and playing gotcha and more time paying attention to current events you would known this.

Maybe you should spend less time spreading The Gospel of The Five and NYPost...

Blackvegetable » 04 Apr 2025, 8:14 am » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2025, 8:14 am

Republicans are weighing the creation of a new bracket for those earning $1 million or more to offset some of the costs of their tax bill, a stark departure from decades of GOP opposition to tax increases, according to people familiar with the matter.

Republicans Debate Hiking Top Tax Rate to 40% for Millionaires

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... llionaires

It's tough to make heads or tails of this Golden Age of Tax Cuts and cheap eggs...

Oh look—another thread where Veghead throws out headlines and demands answers from the crowd, all while leaving his own stack of unanswered questions collecting dust like every one of his intellectual obligations.

 You still haven’t responded to basic questions in your last OPs, but here you are again, playing forum quizmaster like anyone takes your demands seriously anymore. But hey, let’s keep the charity going.

 So here’s a fair question—not that I expect you to answer it, of course, because we all know how this dance goes:

If this proposal to raise the top tax rate to 40% for millionaires is, as you're implying, a contradiction of GOP tax orthodoxy... do you believe it reflects a genuine shift in Republican economic priorities, or is it just a political fig leaf to push through more corporate giveaways?

 Feel free to ignore it like the others—I’m just here to add to the growing museum of things Veghead refuses to answer in his own threads.

1. Continue to prove that the rules don't apply to him.
2. Evade
 
 

Vegas » 04 Apr 2025, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2025, 9:28 am

Oh look—another thread where Veghead throws out headlines and demands answers from the crowd, all while leaving his own stack of unanswered questions collecting dust like every one of his intellectual obligations.

 You still haven’t responded to basic questions in your last OPs, but here you are again, playing forum quizmaster like anyone takes your demands seriously anymore. But hey, let’s keep the charity going.

 So here’s a fair question—not that I expect you to answer it, of course, because we all know how this dance goes:

 Feel free to ignore it like the others—I’m just here to add to the growing museum of things Veghead refuses to answer in his own threads.

1. Continue to prove that the rules don't apply to him.
2. Evade

So just to be clear, you are demanding answers to your question about my OP, but you refuse to answer even one of my questions about yours.  Don't you ever **** accuse me of the rules not applying to me ever again. You hypocritical narcissistic scumbag. 

*Huey » 04 Apr 2025, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2025, 8:41 am

Sure.  If you spent less time hijacking topics and playing gotcha and more time paying attention to current events you would known this.

 

Blackvegetable » 04 Apr 2025, 8:57 am » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2025, 8:57 am

Maybe you should spend less time spreading The Gospel of The Five and NYPost...

vs vanity fair?

ROG62 » 04 Apr 2025, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2025, 9:37 am

Bringing The Substance, Rog?

ROG62 » 04 Apr 2025, 9:38 am » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2025, 9:38 am

vs vanity fair?

Yea...

Be a good start.

Blackvegetable » 04 Apr 2025, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2025, 9:34 am

So just to be clear, you are demanding answers to your question about my OP, but you refuse to answer even one of my questions about yours.  Don't you ever **** accuse me of the rules not applying to me ever again. You hypocritical narcissistic scumbag. 

Prediction fulfilled in both instances. 1. Evaded 2. Rules don't apply to him. 100% accuracy.

     You literally can't come up with any intelligent thoughts, can you? you even have to hide behind other member's quotes. 

Answer the question, coward. 

1. Once again, he will prove that the rules don't apply to him
2. Copy me again

Vegas » 04 Apr 2025, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2025, 9:44 am

Prediction fulfilled in both instances. 1. Evaded 2. Rules don't apply to him. 100% accuracy.

     You literally can't come up with any intelligent thoughts, can you? you even have to hide behind other member's quotes. 

Answer the question, coward. 

1. Once again, he will prove that the rules don't apply to him
2. Copy me again

Do you need a spork and some condiment?