Still evades the question. Hides behind a question. 100% accuracy.
Did you answer my question about your OP?Vegas » 04 Apr 2025, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑ Still evades the question. Hides behind a question. 100% accuracy.
More evidence that he says/does the same **** day after day. Same old, same old.
Did you answer any of my questions about yours? Mine was after. But you already know that.
The article I linked to was Axios.Blackvegetable » 04 Apr 2025, 8:57 am » wrote: ↑ Maybe you should spend less time spreading The Gospel of The Five and NYPost...
He has been having a bad few days. I triggered Mary and he had a hard time finding his preschool teachers to change his diapers.
Vegas » 04 Apr 2025, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑ He has been having a bad few days. I triggered Mary and he had a hard time finding his preschool teachers to change his diapers.
*Huey » 04 Apr 2025, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑![]()
Yeah, maybe if he read the post and watched the Five he would be better informed. Hell, even anti trump Drudge would be better for him.
Post the context.
*Huey » 04 Apr 2025, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑![]()
Yeah, maybe if he read the post and watched the Five he would be better informed. Hell, even anti trump Drudge would be better for him.
Vegas avatar Vegas +3 14 minutes ago
The moment I remove the * Nancy will troll the **** out of me.Vegas » 04 Apr 2025, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑ It's too bad I can't tag you. I wanted you to see some of Mary's outbursts. We need to come up with a name where his rage surpasses even Mary. I am thinking Nuclear Nancy.
I accept your surrender. You can not refute that Biden was not mentally capable and Harris was a **** choice.
Is that because context is not relevant, again?*Huey » 04 Apr 2025, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑ I accept your surrender. You can not refute that Biden was not mentally capable and Harris was a **** choice.
You didn't just.....*Huey » 04 Apr 2025, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑ The moment I remove the * Nancy will troll the **** out of me.
Still won't answer my question.
I just did, Nancy.
Continue to evade. Coward.Blackvegetable » 04 Apr 2025, 8:14 am » wrote: ↑ Republicans are weighing the creation of a new bracket for those earning $1 million or more to offset some of the costs of their tax bill, a stark departure from decades of GOP opposition to tax increases, according to people familiar with the matter.
Republicans Debate Hiking Top Tax Rate to 40% for Millionaires
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... llionaires
It's tough to make heads or tails of this Golden Age of Tax Cuts and cheap eggs...
If this proposal to raise the top tax rate to 40% for millionaires is, as you're implying, a contradiction of GOP tax orthodoxy... do you believe it reflects a genuine shift in Republican economic priorities, or is it just a political fig leaf to push through more corporate giveaways?
The ROG, outsubstancing brownie on a daily basis...life is good...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom You're due.
Shut the **** up, get over to your **** thread and answer the question.Vegas » 04 Apr 2025, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑ How many God damn times...YOUR THREAD!!!!! You answer to it.
Why is that so **** hard for you to understand?
1. Continue to be a dumb mother ****.