Liberal Forum

One of the greatest threats to any nation isn’t just economic instability or foreign interference—it’s when a society becomes so deeply polarized that truth itself becomes irrelevant. We’ve reached a point where ideas aren’t judged by their merit, but by who says them. If one side supports an idea, the other side rejects it reflexively, not because it’s wrong—but because they didn’t say it.We see this everywhere: in news cycles, social media, and political discourse. A valid point is no longer a valid point unless it comes from “your team.” The result? Dialogue dies. Compromise becomes impossible. And logic takes a backseat to tribal loyalty.This kind of polarization leads to:

• Instant rejection of ideas that may actually benefit everyone
• Personal attacks replacing debate
• A complete breakdown in mutual trust, even in institutions and data
• Radicalization of both sides, each convinced the other is beyond reason
• An inability to solve real problems, because no one can agree on basic facts

We don’t have to agree on everything—but we do have to agree that ideas deserve to be considered on their own merit. If we can’t do that, then we’re not debating—we’re just shouting across a widening void.

 And now, a note to @Blackvegetable  aka Darth Evader:

Until you answer the backlog of questions in your threads, I won’t be answering a single one in mine. This is called balance—and I’m counting every dodge. Each time you skip a question with an insult, a redirect, or another “copy/paste and sneer” routine, that’s one more I’ll be skipping in return. Debate goes both ways. You want answers? Start giving them.
 

Vegas » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

One of the greatest threats to any nation isn’t just economic instability or foreign interference—it’s when a society becomes so deeply polarized that truth itself becomes irrelevant. We’ve reached a point where ideas aren’t judged by their merit, but by who says them. If one side supports an idea, the other side rejects it reflexively, not because it’s wrong—but because they didn’t say it.We see this everywhere: in news cycles, social media, and political discourse. A valid point is no longer a valid point unless it comes from “your team.” The result? Dialogue dies. Compromise becomes impossible. And logic takes a backseat to tribal loyalty.This kind of polarization leads to:

• Instant rejection of ideas that may actually benefit everyone
• Personal attacks replacing debate
• A complete breakdown in mutual trust, even in institutions and data
• Radicalization of both sides, each convinced the other is beyond reason
• An inability to solve real problems, because no one can agree on basic facts

We don’t have to agree on everything—but we do have to agree that ideas deserve to be considered on their own merit. If we can’t do that, then we’re not debating—we’re just shouting across a widening void.

 And now, a note to @Blackvegetable  aka Darth Evader:

Until you answer the backlog of questions in your threads, I won’t be answering a single one in mine. This is called balance—and I’m counting every dodge. Each time you skip a question with an insult, a redirect, or another “copy/paste and sneer” routine, that’s one more I’ll be skipping in return. Debate goes both ways. You want answers? Start giving them.

Until you answer the backlog of questions in your threads, I won’t be answering a single one in mine. 

You never have.

You won't.

 

Vegas » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

One of the greatest threats to any nation isn’t just economic instability or foreign interference—it’s when a society becomes so deeply polarized that truth itself becomes irrelevant. We’ve reached a point where ideas aren’t judged by their merit, but by who says them. If one side supports an idea, the other side rejects it reflexively, not because it’s wrong—but because they didn’t say it.We see this everywhere: in news cycles, social media, and political discourse. A valid point is no longer a valid point unless it comes from “your team.” The result? Dialogue dies. Compromise becomes impossible. And logic takes a backseat to tribal loyalty.This kind of polarization leads to:

• Instant rejection of ideas that may actually benefit everyone
• Personal attacks replacing debate
• A complete breakdown in mutual trust, even in institutions and data
• Radicalization of both sides, each convinced the other is beyond reason
• An inability to solve real problems, because no one can agree on basic facts

We don’t have to agree on everything—but we do have to agree that ideas deserve to be considered on their own merit. If we can’t do that, then we’re not debating—we’re just shouting across a widening void.

 And now, a note to @Blackvegetable  aka Darth Evader:

Until you answer the backlog of questions in your threads, I won’t be answering a single one in mine. This is called balance—and I’m counting every dodge. Each time you skip a question with an insult, a redirect, or another “copy/paste and sneer” routine, that’s one more I’ll be skipping in return. Debate goes both ways. You want answers? Start giving them.

We’ve reached a point where ideas aren’t judged by their merit, but by who says them

I know, right?

Check out this moron...

Lol. No stupid ***. Here, let me narrow it down for you. Whatever your stupid liberal sources say ie...CNN, MSNBC, and your brainless legtwing blogs you love, if you take the complete opposite of what they tell you to think, then you will find the truth about Trump. 

 

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

You never have.

You won't.

Says the guy who’s been ducking questions like it’s cardio. You’ve dodged so many times I’m thinking of issuing a punch card—one more, and you get a free self-own.Keep pretending this is about me, Veghead. We all know the only consistent thing in your threads is your refusal to engage with your own arguments. You want answers? Start leading by example—or just keep performing for the mirror.


Blatant projection- Mary has entered the building already. 

Vegas » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑

1 minute ago

Says the guy who’s been ducking questions like it’s cardio. You’ve dodged so many times I’m thinking of issuing a punch card—one more, and you get a free self-own.Keep pretending this is about me, Veghead. We all know the only consistent thing in your threads is your refusal to engage with your own arguments. You want answers? Start leading by example—or just keep performing for the mirror.

Blatant projection- Mary has entered the building already.

You need to get over to your thread and kill yourself. 

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

I know, right?

Check out this moron...

        He is back to copy/pasting quotes again. The desperation.


Let me remind you why you do this: 

Why Narcissists Copy/Paste Your Words as “Gotchas”:

• Control through narrative manipulation: By repeating your words back at you, they attempt to control the conversation and reframe your statements to suit their narrative, no matter how far-fetched.
• Avoidance of original thought: Narcissists often lack the ability—or willingness—to construct thoughtful arguments, so they rely on others’ words to substitute for critical thinking.
• Projection masked as analysis: They project their own flaws onto others by using your past statements as if they were some kind of confession or proof of weakness, despite context.
• Shaming tactic: Quoting your words out of context is used to publicly embarrass or undermine you, not to engage with your point but to assert dominance.
• Ego preservation: They can’t stand losing, so instead of arguing with substance, they dig through your history like it’s a vault of secret weapons—except the weapons are water balloons.

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

You need to kill yourself.

Is this Meltdown Mary or Nuclear Nancy?

Vegas » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Says the guy who’s been ducking questions like it’s cardio. You’ve dodged so many times I’m thinking of issuing a punch card—one more, and you get a free self-own.Keep pretending this is about me, Veghead. We all know the only consistent thing in your threads is your refusal to engage with your own arguments. You want answers? Start leading by example—or just keep performing for the mirror.

Blatant projection- Mary has entered the building already.

Just pull a @*HooooeyVagina...

Demand a link, every comment in the thread and a blood sample.

Then pull an @*HooooeyVagina/@*VegasVagina Daily Double and welsh.
 

Vegas » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

        He is back to copy/pasting quotes again. The desperation.

Let me remind you why you do this: 

Why Narcissists Copy/Paste Your Words as “Gotchas”:

Thoughts...


 

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Just pull a @*HooooeyVagina...

Demand a link, every comment in the thread and a blood sample.

Then pull an @*HooooeyVagina/@*VegasVagina Daily Double and welsh.

You can scream “welsh,” and throw in whatever cryptic nonsense you want—but none of that changes the scoreboard. You’ve been dodging every challenge like it’s your signature move. So until you finally step up and respond with something other than a jumbled insult cocktail, I’ll just keep counting dodges and letting you perform for the void.
 Carry on, Ctrl+V Commander.

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Thoughts...

You should try it sometime.

Will you be getting around to answer my questions on your OPs?          Sorry, I just needed the laugh.

Blackvegetable » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

Thoughts...

  seems that you are the only thought in his head 

Mrkelly » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

  seems that you are the only thought in his head

    I am not the one that has daily meltdowns over him. Huey and I induce his tantrums. It's fun to watch.

Vegas » 47 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

47 minutes ago

One of the greatest threats to any nation isn’t just economic instability or foreign interference—it’s when a society becomes so deeply polarized that truth itself becomes irrelevant. We’ve reached a point where ideas aren’t judged by their merit, but by who says them. If one side supports an idea, the other side rejects it reflexively, not because it’s wrong—but because they didn’t say it.We see this everywhere: in news cycles, social media, and political discourse. A valid point is no longer a valid point unless it comes from “your team.” The result? Dialogue dies. Compromise becomes impossible. And logic takes a backseat to tribal loyalty.This kind of polarization leads to:

• Instant rejection of ideas that may actually benefit everyone
• Personal attacks replacing debate
• A complete breakdown in mutual trust, even in institutions and data
• Radicalization of both sides, each convinced the other is beyond reason
• An inability to solve real problems, because no one can agree on basic facts

We don’t have to agree on everything—but we do have to agree that ideas deserve to be considered on their own merit. If we can’t do that, then we’re not debating—we’re just shouting across a widening void.

 And now, a note to @Blackvegetable  aka Darth Evader:

Until you answer the backlog of questions in your threads, I won’t be answering a single one in mine. This is called balance—and I’m counting every dodge. Each time you skip a question with an insult, a redirect, or another “copy/paste and sneer” routine, that’s one more I’ll be skipping in return. Debate goes both ways. You want answers? Start giving them.

Welcome to the carnival , welcome 2 the party take ya 2 the edge of your seat.

"Def Leapard" Lets Go.

https://youtu.be/8UgvND5W39U?feature=shared


 

Vegas » 28 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

28 minutes ago

    I am not the one that has daily meltdowns over him. Huey and I induce his tantrums. It's fun to watch.

  it’s funny to watch you twos meltdowns

Vegas » 36 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

36 minutes ago

You should try it sometime.

Will you be getting around to answer my questions on your OPs?          Sorry, I just needed the laugh.

You fix that number, in advance, and we can talk about it.

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

You fix that number, in advance, and we can talk about it.

What number are you talking about? Any rational person, with an IQ over 100, would just answer questions intelligently. No games, no turning it around on the other, no hiding behind incessant questions/demands, they just answer. Period. 

1. You will now project and completely ignore how often you dodge. Thus, QED...again.

Mrkelly » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

  it’s funny to watch you twos meltdowns

Uh ohhhhhh....it looks like we have ourselves another projector. Accusing us what the other is guilty of.         

Well done. However, next time make your projections less obvious. Make me work for it.

Vegas » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

What number are you talking about? Any rational person, with an IQ over 100, would just answer questions intelligently. No games, no turning it around on the other, no hiding behind incessant questions/demands, they just answer. Period. 

1. You will now project and completely ignore how often you dodge. Thus, QED...again.

. No games, no turning it around on the other, no hiding behind incessant questions/demands, they just answer. Period.

Stuff like this?

Until you answer the backlog of questions in your threads, I won’t be answering a single one in mine.

I think the real problem is people are no longer objective and look at both sides.

I used to watch news and listen to radio both sides hear what each hadda say & make my own opinions about it.

Today people are more "Tribal" and ya either for my side or I hate your guts wont even speak to or look at ya