nefarious101 » 10 Apr 2025, 3:07 pm » wrote: ↑ More WINNING!!
undermining the Trump agenda just got a lot harder
I know you're a dickhead and I know you don't understand
Less Is more, Naffynefarious101 » 10 Apr 2025, 7:21 pm » wrote: ↑ I know you're a dickhead and I know you don't understand
there is no pity for you
Hopefully it requires rogue judges to pick up the tab for everyone's attorney's fees when they get overturned by the Supreme Court. If they can't afford to pay, then we will take their youngest daughter or wife, and sell them to the Albanians to pay off their debt. Did those numb-nuts congresswhores forget to write that language into the Bill?nefarious101 » 10 Apr 2025, 3:07 pm » wrote: ↑ More WINNING!!
undermining the Trump agenda just got a lot harder
You've got a PhD in Dickheadism....Blackvegetable » 10 Apr 2025, 7:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Less Is more, Naffy
And much less is so much more....
nefarious101 » 11 Apr 2025, 5:02 am » wrote: ↑ You've got a PhD in Dickheadism....
That makes you an educated idiot
You have no ideas, no opinion of your own and you've never had a "REAL LIVE GIRLFRIEND" if we don't count your Grandma.
You're not qualified to criticize anyone about anything
So stay in your lane dickhead
You have no ideas, no opinion of your own
less reasonable doubt, more understanding of self evident time alive as personally living eternally separated adapting to the moment here 24/7 never same total sum again per heartbeat added now.Blackvegetable » 10 Apr 2025, 7:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Less Is more, Naffy
And much less is so much more....
Skans » 10 Apr 2025, 9:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Hopefully it requires rogue judges to pick up the tab for everyone's attorney's fees when they get overturned by the Supreme Court. If they can't afford to pay, then we will take their youngest daughter or wife, and sell them to the Albanians to pay off their debt. Did those numb-nuts congresswhores forget to write that language into the Bill?
You don't own anyone here. It is impossible if you cannot stay on subject, refuse to answer questions, post your own opinions, etc.
ConsRule » 12 Apr 2025, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑ You don't own anyone here. It is impossible if you cannot stay on subject, refuse to answer questions, post your own opinions, etc.
I will give you credit for having a very high opinion of yourself. You are one of the people a former boss was referring to when he said "If he didn't toot his own horn, he would never hear music!"
Sound familiar?Not answering any of your questions until you post a lie I told AND proof the statement was false. So far, you are 0-1 in that effort. Ball is in your court.
It does...because when I ask you a question I will not answer any question from you until you answer the question I asked. I have had that position for years. Apparently, in addition to being remarkably stupid, your dementia is getting worse.
But that's another of your lies, Cons..ConsRule » 12 Apr 2025, 8:59 am » wrote: ↑ It does...because when I ask you a question I will not answer any question from you until you answer the question I asked. I have had that position for years. Apparently, in addition to being remarkably stupid, your dementia is getting worse.
Time to call a **** POTUS a "**** POTUS"..
In the post you quoted, I asked you to post a lie I made and the proof it was false. You posted that I said Kaplan did not us NY Law for his definition of rape. Since you didn't provide proof, I posted a link to his actual filing in which he clearly states he used a definition other than the one in NY Law because he felt it was too restrictive. Therefore, what I said was not a lie. You still have not posted a lie by me with proof it was false. Kapeesh?Blackvegetable » 12 Apr 2025, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑ But that's another of your lies, Cons..
You welsh AFTER your questions are answered.
There's another lie about your lie.ConsRule » 12 Apr 2025, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑ In the post you quoted, I asked you to post a lie I made and the proof it was false. You posted that I said Kaplan did not us NY Law for his definition of rape. Since you didn't provide proof, I posted a link to his actual filing in which he clearly states he used a definition other than the one in NY Law because he felt it was too restrictive. Therefore, what I said was not a lie. You still have not posted a lie by me with proof it was false. Kapeesh?