Liberal Forum

Now, the billionaire is pointing the finger at California, New York and Massachusetts, claiming they are responsible for receiving the bulk of the fraudulent funds - $305 million, to be exact, Fox News reported.

'There's a reason for the mass exodus from Democrat-run states that have mismanaged their economies and driven residents to the nearest Republican-led state,' White House spokesperson Harrison Fields told the outlet. 

'High taxes, poor stewardship of taxpayer dollars and progressive policies continue to yield negative results, which is why Americans overwhelmingly support the work of DOGE.'


California bore a significant share of the misuse, as the agency said the West Coast state was responsible for a staggering 68 percent of unemployment benefits.

 According to DOGE, these payments - some made to individuals on the terrorist watchlist or with criminal records - occurred during Joe Biden's presidency. 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... fraud.html

Ca, Ny and Ma.  WTF is going on in those states.

If anyone has any actual facts that dispute the DOGE claims bring them on. This is not bout sources.

*Huey » Today, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:51 am

Now, the billionaire is pointing the finger at California, New York and Massachusetts, claiming they are responsible for receiving the bulk of the fraudulent funds - $305 million, to be exact, Fox News reported.

'There's a reason for the mass exodus from Democrat-run states that have mismanaged their economies and driven residents to the nearest Republican-led state,' White House spokesperson Harrison Fields told the outlet. 

'High taxes, poor stewardship of taxpayer dollars and progressive policies continue to yield negative results, which is why Americans overwhelmingly support the work of DOGE.'

California bore a significant share of the misuse, as the agency said the West Coast state was responsible for a staggering 68 percent of unemployment benefits.

 According to DOGE, these payments - some made to individuals on the terrorist watchlist or with criminal records - occurred during Joe Biden's presidency. 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... fraud.html

Ca, Ny and Ma.  WTF is going on in those states.

Given the record of DOGE, and FOX''s readiness to recatapult propaganda uncritically, how much faith - if any - should we place in your 3rd hand report?

*Huey » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

14 minutes ago

If anyone has any actual facts that dispute the DOGE claims bring them on. This is not bout sources.

What if the sources are notoriously unreliable? 

*Huey » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

14 minutes ago

If anyone has any actual facts that dispute the DOGE claims bring them on. This is not bout sources.

Are these your words?

Bitch, you would throw a hissy fit if someone on the right used an opinion piece.  You are being told what to think

 

*Huey » 35 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

35 minutes ago

If anyone has any actual facts that dispute the DOGE claims bring them on. This is not bout sources.

One of the states is my Massachusetts...

They just arrested two Democrats for wire fraud, bribes....stuff like that...


 

*Huey » Today, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:51 am

Now, the billionaire is pointing the finger at California, New York and Massachusetts, claiming they are responsible for receiving the bulk of the fraudulent funds - $305 million, to be exact, Fox News reported.

'There's a reason for the mass exodus from Democrat-run states that have mismanaged their economies and driven residents to the nearest Republican-led state,' White House spokesperson Harrison Fields told the outlet. 

'High taxes, poor stewardship of taxpayer dollars and progressive policies continue to yield negative results, which is why Americans overwhelmingly support the work of DOGE.'

California bore a significant share of the misuse, as the agency said the West Coast state was responsible for a staggering 68 percent of unemployment benefits.

 According to DOGE, these payments - some made to individuals on the terrorist watchlist or with criminal records - occurred during Joe Biden's presidency. 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... fraud.html

Ca, Ny and Ma.  WTF is going on in those states.

Something tells me that they are going to find a lot more blue states than just those 3 that are involved of fraud.

As if any of us are shocked.

Vegas » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

Something tells me that they are going to find a lot more blue states than just those 3 that are involved of fraud.

There are.  But those are the to three states they claim are responsible for the bulk of the fraud.

*Huey » Today, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:51 am

Now, the billionaire is pointing the finger at California, New York and Massachusetts, claiming they are responsible for receiving the bulk of the fraudulent funds - $305 million, to be exact, Fox News reported.

'There's a reason for the mass exodus from Democrat-run states that have mismanaged their economies and driven residents to the nearest Republican-led state,' White House spokesperson Harrison Fields told the outlet. 

'High taxes, poor stewardship of taxpayer dollars and progressive policies continue to yield negative results, which is why Americans overwhelmingly support the work of DOGE.'

California bore a significant share of the misuse, as the agency said the West Coast state was responsible for a staggering 68 percent of unemployment benefits.

 According to DOGE, these payments - some made to individuals on the terrorist watchlist or with criminal records - occurred during Joe Biden's presidency. 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... fraud.html

Ca, Ny and Ma.  WTF is going on in those states.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/12/upsh ... laims.html



Musk’s Latest Fraud Finding Isn’t What It Seems


His team found cases of seemingly fake people receiving unemployment benefits. But that fake data exists for a reason.
 
 

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/12/upsh ... laims.html

Musk’s Latest Fraud Finding Isn’t What It Seems

His team found cases of seemingly fake people receiving unemployment benefits. But that fake data exists for a reason.

Paywall.  Post what's relevant.  

Oh, and you are stil chasing me from thread to thread.  Too **** funny.

I'll check later to see if you posted anything relevant.

*Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Paywall.  Post what's relevant.  

Oh, and you are stil chasing me from thread to thread.  Too **** funny.

I'll check later to see if you posted anything relevant.

I'm kicking your cowardly *** from thread to thread...

Nod, Sackless.


The issue dates to early in the pandemic when millions of Americans surged onto state unemployment rolls in an unprecedented expansion of the safety net. The emergency aid program enacted during President Trump’s first term was also susceptible to fraud. As many as 15 percent of unemployment claims were fraudulent, often using stolen identities.

 To preserve records of that fraud and protect victims of the identity theft, the U.S. Labor Department encouraged state agencies that administer unemployment benefits to create “pseudo claim” records — in effect, to tie real cases of fraud in their data to make-believe people. The implausibility of the records was the point. Agencies were seeking a way to keep track of fraud claims while detaching them from the identities of innocent people who might one day apply for unemployment benefits themselves.

 Now four years later, Mr. Musk and his team appear to have found those make-believe people. Their claims about them were also repeated by Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-deRemer during a cabinet meeting at the White House on Thursday.

ibid.
 

Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

I'm kicking your cowardly *** from thread to thread...

Nod, Sackless.

The issue dates to early in the pandemic when millions of Americans surged onto state unemployment rolls in an unprecedented expansion of the safety net. The emergency aid program enacted during President Trump’s first term was also susceptible to fraud. As many as 15 percent of unemployment claims were fraudulent, often using stolen identities.

 To preserve records of that fraud and protect victims of the identity theft, the U.S. Labor Department encouraged state agencies that administer unemployment benefits to create “pseudo claim” records — in effect, to tie real cases of fraud in their data to make-believe people. The implausibility of the records was the point. Agencies were seeking a way to keep track of fraud claims while detaching them from the identities of innocent people who might one day apply for unemployment benefits themselves.

 Now four years later, Mr. Musk and his team appear to have found those make-believe people. Their claims about them were also repeated by Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-deRemer during a cabinet meeting at the White House on Thursday.

ibid.

Dude, there is no context where you could kick my ***.  You know what I look like. you know my address, you know my name.  Stop **** talking and get her done, ******.

Suffolk Va, baby.  You have the mad saved.  Stop talking and show me what you got, Bitch.
 

*Huey » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Dude, there is no context where you could kick my ***.  You know what I look like. you know my address, you know my name.  Stop **** talking and get her done, ******.

Suffolk Va, baby.  You have the mad saved.  Stop talking and show me what you got, Bitch.

1917 Piedmont Rd 23435 in case you forgot. Whenever you are ready, Punk *** Bitch, come on down.


I think you should PG your meltdown


And your stalky melty pm

Blackvegetable » 24 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

24 minutes ago

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/12/upsh ... laims.html

Musk’s Latest Fraud Finding Isn’t What It Seems

His team found cases of seemingly fake people receiving unemployment benefits. But that fake data exists for a reason.

Of course you claim the fraud discovered by DOGE is imaginary.
These people OTOH seem to know a little bit more than you............https://waysandmeans.house.gov/2025/03/ ... x-dollars/
 
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 42 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

42 minutes ago

Of course you claim the fraud discovered by DOGE is imaginary.
These people OTOH seem to know a little bit more than you............https://waysandmeans.house.gov/2025/03/ ... x-dollars/

• Department of Justice has 1,648 open, uncharged COVID-19 criminal matters and the Labor Department has reported 157,000 open UI fraud hotline complaints. Failure to extend the statute of limitations will result in criminals going unpunished and forgoing recovery of billions in taxpayer dollars.

I'm sure you're getting kinda anxious about that 5k....

Blackvegetable » 34 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

34 minutes ago

I'm sure you're getting kinda anxious about that 5k....

I bet you were excited about the $25,000 that Kamala promised home buyers...
 

Blackvegetable » 44 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

44 minutes ago

I'm sure you're getting kinda anxious about that 5k....

I'm sure your intention was to discredit DOGE and I'm also sure you failed MISERABLY......  

All democrats should be thrown into active volcanos.

Blackvegetable » Today, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:25 pm

1917 Piedmont Rd 23435 in case you forgot. Whenever you are ready, Punk *** Bitch, come on down.

I think you should PG your meltdown

And your stalky melty pm

lol…