Liberal Forum

https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va ... sattorney/


Trump’s D.C. U.S. attorney pick appeared on Russian state media over 150 times

Trump nominee Ed Martin’s 100-plus appearances on Russian state-directed media RT and Sputnik from 2016 to 2024 alarm some former national security officials.In early 2022, Martin told an interviewer on the same arm of RT’s global network that “there’s no evidence” of a Russian military buildup on Ukraine’s borders, criticizing U.S. officials as warmongering and ignoring Russia’s security concerns. Russia invaded nine days later, igniting a war that continues today.

 Martin is now interim U.S. attorney for D.C. and Trump’s pick to serve full time in the role.


So we KNOW he must be either a tool, an idiot, or an asset.

IS THIS POINT CLEAR?

IF NOT FIND A @*VEGASVAGINA THREAD.

 
 

Blackvegetable » 16 Apr 2025, 6:20 am » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2025, 6:20 am

https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va ... sattorney/

Trump’s D.C. U.S. attorney pick appeared on Russian state media over 150 times



So we KNOW I must be either a tool, an idiot, or an asset.


 

I'll take your first two examples, Boris.

Martin did not disclose the appearances last month on a Senate Judiciary Committee questionnaire, which asks nominees to list all media interviews. Analysis of television archives suggests he went on RT and Sputnik more often than on any major cable network during that span.


ibid.


That SHOULD disqualify him...

Blackvegetable » 16 Apr 2025, 6:20 am » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2025, 6:20 am

https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va ... sattorney/

Trump’s D.C. U.S. attorney pick appeared on Russian state media over 150 times

Trump nominee Ed Martin’s 100-plus appearances on Russian state-directed media RT and Sputnik from 2016 to 2024 alarm some former national security officials.In early 2022, Martin told an interviewer on the same arm of RT’s global network that “there’s no evidence” of a Russian military buildup on Ukraine’s borders, criticizing U.S. officials as warmongering and ignoring Russia’s security concerns. Russia invaded nine days later, igniting a war that continues today.

 Martin is now interim U.S. attorney for D.C. and Trump’s pick to serve full time in the role.

So we KNOW he must be either a tool, an idiot, or an asset.

IS THIS POINT CLEAR?

IF NOT FIND A @*VEGASVAGINA THREAD.

and the Dickhead continues to suffer

RebelGator » 16 Apr 2025, 6:25 am » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2025, 6:25 am

I'll take your first two examples, Boris.

Useful Cracker....

nefarious101 » 16 Apr 2025, 6:26 am » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2025, 6:26 am

and the Dickhead continues to suffer

Here comes The Butthurt....

Former U.S. national security officials and analysts said Martin’s RT and Sputnik appearances, and his failure to disclose them, raise questions about his judgment and candor. The U.S. attorney’s office in Washington is the largest in the country and has wide jurisdiction to prosecute important national security offenses, former officials said. Its leader should be alert to the threats and risks posed by Russia and other influence operations from overseas, such as the ones the office has prosecuted in recent years involving Russia and other foreign actors, they argued. 



“Prior to the 2016 election, it shows a little bit of bad judgment,” said Olga Belogolova, director of the Emerging Technologies Initiative at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, who has studied Russian influence operations in the United States and Europe, including for Facebook. “Post-2016, that shows very bad judgment, because since then you cannot pretend you didn’t know what this is, because the whole world was talking about it.”

Ibid.

When this worm turns, we'll hunt down the traitors and send them to Venezuela. 
 

Blackvegetable » 16 Apr 2025, 6:28 am » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2025, 6:28 am

Here comes The Butthurt....

well Dickhead....thanks for the warning......bring it on






this ******* constantly sets himself up by saying stupid ****

nefarious101 » 16 Apr 2025, 6:33 am » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2025, 6:33 am

well Dickhead....thanks for the warning......bring it on



this ******* constantly sets himself up by saying stupid ****

Stoking it...

Blackvegetable » 16 Apr 2025, 6:35 am » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2025, 6:35 am

Stoking it...

Gotcha again Dickhead..............Cha-Ching!

Martin has posed a challenge for the Senate Judiciary Committee, not only because of his lack of experience as a prosecutor or trial lawyer but also because of the volume of his statements on social media and in traditional media, and the unusual extent of his omissions. Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said Thursday that Martin has received more than 500 questions from senators, far more than normal. 


Martin disclosed 16 media interviews to the committee from 2016 to 2024, none involving RT or Sputnik, in a questionnaire he signed March 28. He said he searched publicly available electronic databases, but he cautioned that “despite my searches, there may be other materials that I have been unable to identify, find, or remember.”

ibid.

A very credible man, this Martin.

I wonder what the WH has to say..

Asked about Martin’s pro-Russian stances and media role, a White House official said: “President Trump made a brilliant choice in selecting Ed Martin to serve a full, permanent term as United States Attorney for the District of Columbia. With a distinguished record of service, Ed is the perfect leader to restore law and order and make our Nation’s Capital safe and beautiful once again.”

it's a clown car...
 

Blackvegetable » 16 Apr 2025, 6:31 am » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2025, 6:31 am

When this worm turns, we'll hunt down the traitors and send them to Venezuela. !!!       

At this point you could always write to Garcia to tell him that you love him with all your heart  and that you love the criminal organization he belongs to......  
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 16 Apr 2025, 6:52 am » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2025, 6:52 am

At this point you could always write to Garcia to tell him that you love him with all your heart  and that you love the criminal organization he belongs to......

Ghetto,

You make the rules, we'll play by them.
 

Blackvegetable » 16 Apr 2025, 6:54 am » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2025, 6:54 am

Ghetto,

You make the rules, we'll play by them.

You could always offer to share your apartment with  Garcia's wife and child and offer them your legal services too............!
 
 

Blackvegetable » 16 Apr 2025, 6:20 am » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2025, 6:20 am

https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va ... sattorney/


Trump’s D.C. U.S. attorney pick appeared on Russian state media over 150 times

Trump nominee Ed Martin’s 100-plus appearances on Russian state-directed media RT and Sputnik from 2016 to 2024 alarm some former national security officials.In early 2022, Martin told an interviewer on the same arm of RT’s global network that “there’s no evidence” of a Russian military buildup on Ukraine’s borders, criticizing U.S. officials as warmongering and ignoring Russia’s security concerns. Russia invaded nine days later, igniting a war that continues today.

 Martin is now interim U.S. attorney for D.C. and Trump’s pick to serve full time in the role.


So we KNOW he must be either a tool, an idiot, or an asset.

IS THIS POINT CLEAR?

IF NOT FIND A @*VEGASVAGINA THREAD.

What is the appeal of humanity's reasonable doubt life isn't self evident time living eternally separated since conceived in the space of adapting to the moment here since personal conception?

Opague cognition is instinctive awareness humanity doesn't explain life in plain sight of living uniquely alive daily here.
When I googled opaque cognition this was the first listing.

"Opaque cognition" refers to mental processes or cognitive functions that are difficult to understand or access, often due to the lack of clear, transparent pathways or mechanisms. It highlights the challenge of understanding the inner workings of the mind(personal brain), particularly in areas like consciousness, dreaming, and even the transmission of cultural knowledge.

Martin has omitted far more from his nomination materials than other recent U.S. attorney nominees, two people familiar with the process said Monday, one of them estimating omissions of about 350 events, interviews and media appearances. By comparison, only about three of roughly 80 such nominees from 2021 through 2024 left out published writings and public statements in supplemental committee disclosures, and none missed more than four items, one of the people said.

ibid.


Brilliant....

No wonder why his first cabinet was riddled with Deep State operatives.





so **** g'ddammned stupid 

RT and Sputnik’s parent company “are engaged in covert influence activities aimed at undermining American elections and democracies, functioning like a de facto arm of Russia’s intelligence apparatus,” then-Secretary of State Antony Blinken said Sept. 13.


Ibid.


But Pootie wrote glowing letters of recommendation. 

Blackvegetable » 16 Apr 2025, 6:20 am » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2025, 6:20 am

https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va ... sattorney/

Trump’s D.C. U.S. attorney pick appeared on Russian state media over 150 times

Trump nominee Ed Martin’s 100-plus appearances on Russian state-directed media RT and Sputnik from 2016 to 2024 alarm some former national security officials.In early 2022, Martin told an interviewer on the same arm of RT’s global network that “there’s no evidence” of a Russian military buildup on Ukraine’s borders, criticizing U.S. officials as warmongering and ignoring Russia’s security concerns. Russia invaded nine days later, igniting a war that continues today.

 Martin is now interim U.S. attorney for D.C. and Trump’s pick to serve full time in the role.

So we KNOW he must be either a tool, an idiot, or an asset.

IS THIS POINT CLEAR?

IF NOT FIND A @*VEGASVAGINA THREAD.

Oh, it’s clear, Mary. Crystal. You posted a headline, screamed your conclusion in all caps, and—right on cue—dragged me into it like that magically makes it airtight.

Here is your question to dodge. LOL

If you’re so confident Martin is a tool, idiot, or asset, then how about laying out your reasoning beyond “he went on RT a lot”? You know, actual argument—not just another copy-paste panic followed by a @tag and a tantrum.

 Of course, I won’t hold my breath. You’re already sitting pretty at dodge #85, and I expect “Post the OP” is warming up backstage as we speak.
 

Vegas » 16 Apr 2025, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2025, 9:26 am

Oh, it’s clear, Mary. Crystal. You posted a headline, screamed your conclusion in all caps, and—right on cue—dragged me into it like that magically makes it airtight.

Here is your question to dodge. LOL

 Of course, I won’t hold my breath. You’re already sitting pretty at dodge #85, and I expect “Post the OP” is warming up backstage as we speak.

Just read the citation.

Blackvegetable » 16 Apr 2025, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2025, 9:28 am

Just read the citation.

Ah yes, the classic dodge: “Just read the citation.” Mary, if reading an article was all it took to form a position, we wouldn’t need forums—we’d just post links and grunt, like you. 

 You made the thread. That means it’s your job to explain your point—not mine, not WaPo’s. How many **** times....  Until then, you’re still dodging—#86, by the way. Keep climbing.