Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 17 Apr 2025, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 9:59 am

Then **** yours.

Mine are fair questions to your OPs. That's the point of political forums you stupid dumb mother ****. 

Vegas » 17 Apr 2025, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 10:01 am

Mine are fair questions to your OPs. That's the point of political forums you stupid dumb mother ****.

No...they're abstract generic pap, betraying a recognition that you're a moron who doesn't know anything.

Nod.
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Apr 2025, 10:05 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 10:05 am

No...they're abstract generic pap, betraying a recognition that you're a moron who doesn't know anything.

Nod.

“Abstract generic pap,” the phrase Mary pulls out whenever someone strings together more than one coherent thought without using profanity or fantasy gravel camps. You didn’t refute anything, Mary—you just waved it off like a toddler swatting away vegetables.

You’re at dodge #103, still pretending that the absence of rage equals the absence of thought. But sure, keep nodding. That’s the only head movement we’ll get from you that resembles critical thinking.
 

Vegas » 17 Apr 2025, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 10:08 am

“Abstract generic pap,” the phrase Mary pulls out whenever someone strings together more than one coherent thought without using profanity or fantasy gravel camps. You didn’t refute anything, Mary—you just waved it off like a toddler swatting away vegetables.

You’re at dodge #103, still pretending that the absence of rage equals the absence of thought. But sure, keep nodding. That’s the only head movement we’ll get from you that resembles critical thinking.

you just waved it off like a toddler swatting away vegetables.

 And then, of course, the projective similies...


 

Blackvegetable » 17 Apr 2025, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 10:20 am

 And then, of course, the projective similies...

Over your head? Dodge 104.

Vegas » 16 Apr 2025, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Apr 2025, 2:30 pm

Let me break this down for you, Mary—real slow, so you can finally figure out why your reply still hasn’t crossed the sacred threshold of Level 2+ on Bloom’s Taxonomy.

1. Level 1 (Remembering): You copied facts from the article. Yes, Martin appeared on Russian media. Yes, he has little relevant experience. You remembered those details. Congrats. You and Google are tied.
2. Level 2 (Understanding): This is where you were supposed to explain what that means. You didn’t. No interpretation. No connecting dots. No weighing how his background affects national security, foreign perception, or institutional credibility. Just insults and repetition.
3. Level 3 (Applying) and above? Nowhere in sight. You didn’t apply the info to broader political patterns, make a case about appointment trends, or offer any comparative context. You certainly didn’t evaluate anything beyond “Grifty bad” and “VegasVagina dumb.”

You restated a source and called it thinking. That’s not analysis—it’s regurgitation with a thesaurus and a grudge. If you ever feel ready to operate above Level 1, I’ll be right here. Clipboard in hand. Still waiting.

Who is Mary?

BuckNaked » 17 Apr 2025, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 10:45 am

Who is Mary?

It's @Blackvegetable  

Huey came up with that. It is actually Meltdown Mary. Whenever he has his meltdowns, we call him that. 

Vegas » 17 Apr 2025, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 10:38 am

Over your head? Dodge 104.

You can't spell "Literacy", literally.

Blackvegetable » 17 Apr 2025, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 11:18 am

You can't spell "Literacy", literally.

Mary, you’ve used “spell literacy” so many times I’m starting to think it’s the only word you can spell. You’re like a Magic 8-Ball with one insult and zero arguments.Try something new—like answering a question before dodge #104 lands.

Vegas » 17 Apr 2025, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 11:23 am

Mary, you’ve used “spell literacy” so many times I’m starting to think it’s the only word you can spell. You’re like a Magic 8-Ball with one insult and zero arguments.Try something new—like answering a question before dodge #104 lands.

You can't spell 'Intelligent' either..

Nor can you define "net".

You're an idiot.
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Apr 2025, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 11:25 am

You can't spell 'Intelligent' either..

Nor can you define "net".

You're an idiot.

Mary, I've asked you to define “net jobs” and “survivorship bias” so many times that at this point, even Google’s embarrassed for you. You keep projecting like it’ll somehow undo the fact that you never answered—because you can’t.

You’re like a broken flashcard that just screams “idiot” instead of offering a definition. But hey—keep going. Maybe by dodge #110, you’ll accidentally stumble into Level 2.
 

Vegas » 17 Apr 2025, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 11:30 am

Mary, I've asked you to define “net jobs” and “survivorship bias” so many times that at this point, even Google’s embarrassed for you. You keep projecting like it’ll somehow undo the fact that you never answered—because you can’t.

You’re like a broken flashcard that just screams “idiot” instead of offering a definition. But hey—keep going. Maybe by dodge #110, you’ll accidentally stumble into Level 2.

Your OP, your job. And **** your demands. 


wi.

Blackvegetable » 17 Apr 2025, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 12:23 pm

Your OP, your job. And **** your demands. 

wi.

        Post the author of this OP. 

So god damn **** stupid. 

Vegas » 17 Apr 2025, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 12:25 pm

        Post the author of this OP. 

So god damn **** stupid.

Mary, I've asked you to define “net jobs” and “survivorship bias” so many times

you're a **** idiot 

Blackvegetable » 17 Apr 2025, 12:27 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 12:27 pm

you're a **** idiot

He is back to quoting me again. Hence, the stalking. 

QED

Watch this:
1. "It's worth repeating"

You dumb piece of ****. 

Vegas » 17 Apr 2025, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 12:28 pm

He is back to quoting me again. Hence, the stalking. 

QED

Watch this:
1. "It's worth repeating"

You dumb piece of ****.

Your words stalk you..

I taunt you.


 

Blackvegetable » 17 Apr 2025, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 12:29 pm

Your words stalk you..

I taunt you.

We’ve officially hit Repost Mode—Mary’s version of flipping the table and yelling, “SEE?!” 

It’s what you do when you’ve got no argument left, no courage to take a deal, and no content of your own—just a library of other people’s thoughts and a keyboard full of bitterness. You don’t quote me because it proves anything—you quote me because it’s all you’ve got.

This isn’t a comeback, Mary. It’s dodge #108 
 

Vegas » 17 Apr 2025, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 12:31 pm

We’ve officially hit Repost Mode—Mary’s version of flipping the table and yelling, “SEE?!” 

It’s what you do when you’ve got no argument left, no courage to take a deal, and no content of your own—just a library of other people’s thoughts and a keyboard full of bitterness. You don’t quote me because it proves anything—you quote me because it’s all you’ve got.

This isn’t a comeback, Mary. It’s dodge #108 

Yes...it is how it's easily done..

when you’ve got no argument 

It IS argument, you **** dimwit.

Blackvegetable » 17 Apr 2025, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 12:34 pm

Yes...it is how it's easily done..

It IS argument, you **** dimwit.

Mary now believes that Ctrl+C = Argument. No context, no commentary, no analysis—just repost your words and scream “See?! I win!” like he discovered debate via a fortune cookie.

Just reposting someone’s words—without context, rebuttal, or any actual thought—is “argument” now? By that logic, Mary, your keyboard is a philosopher and your clipboard deserves a Pulitzer.

You don’t defeat people with their own words—you just expose that you’ve got nothing to add, so you cling to the closest quote like a toddler with a juice box.

That’s not argument. That’s dodge #109 in copy-paste font.
 
 

Vegas » 17 Apr 2025, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 12:39 pm

Mary now believes that Ctrl+C = Argument. No context, no commentary, no analysis—just repost your words and scream “See?! I win!” like he discovered debate via a fortune cookie.

Just reposting someone’s words—without context, rebuttal, or any actual thought—is “argument” now? By that logic, Mary, your keyboard is a philosopher and your clipboard deserves a Pulitzer.

You don’t defeat people with their own words—you just expose that you’ve got nothing to add, so you cling to the closest quote like a toddler with a juice box.

That’s not argument. That’s dodge #109 in copy-paste font.

Shall we take a look at what YOU consider Argument?