Liberal Forum

Ain't this a kick in the nuts.


LONDON—Britain’s top court ruled only those born female can be considered women, a landmark judgment that excludes transgender women from the legal definition and paves the way for tighter limits on female-only spaces and services.  


 The decision Wednesday by the U.K.’s Supreme Court came after a yearslong legal fight over the definition of a woman in a 2010 equality law, and could have far-reaching implications for the protections and freedoms given to transgender women in the U.K.


 “The unanimous decision of this court is that the terms ‘woman’ and ‘sex’ in the Equality Act 2010 refer to biological women and biological sex,” said the court’s deputy president, Lord Hodge.


https://www.wsj.com/world/uk/u-k-suprem ... n-0db68e3a


Common senses prevails.
 

*Huey » 28 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

28 minutes ago

Ain't this a kick in the nuts.

LONDON—Britain’s top court ruled only those born female can be considered women, a landmark judgment that excludes transgender women from the legal definition and paves the way for tighter limits on female-only spaces and services.  

 The decision Wednesday by the U.K.’s Supreme Court came after a yearslong legal fight over the definition of a woman in a 2010 equality law, and could have far-reaching implications for the protections and freedoms given to transgender women in the U.K.

 “The unanimous decision of this court is that the terms ‘woman’ and ‘sex’ in the Equality Act 2010 refer to biological women and biological sex,” said the court’s deputy president, Lord Hodge.

https://www.wsj.com/world/uk/u-k-suprem ... n-0db68e3a

Common senses prevails.

"UNANIMOUS" ...ouch...that's gonna upset the children...

*Huey » 28 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

28 minutes ago

Ain't this a kick in the nuts.

LONDON—Britain’s top court ruled only those born female can be considered women, a landmark judgment that excludes transgender women from the legal definition and paves the way for tighter limits on female-only spaces and services.  

 The decision Wednesday by the U.K.’s Supreme Court came after a yearslong legal fight over the definition of a woman in a 2010 equality law, and could have far-reaching implications for the protections and freedoms given to transgender women in the U.K.

 “The unanimous decision of this court is that the terms ‘woman’ and ‘sex’ in the Equality Act 2010 refer to biological women and biological sex,” said the court’s deputy president, Lord Hodge.

https://www.wsj.com/world/uk/u-k-suprem ... n-0db68e3a

Common senses prevails.

our SCOTUS is too **** stupid for a ruling like that on that...

*Huey » 33 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

33 minutes ago

Ain't this a kick in the nuts.

LONDON—Britain’s top court ruled only those born female can be considered women, a landmark judgment that excludes transgender women from the legal definition and paves the way for tighter limits on female-only spaces and services.  

 The decision Wednesday by the U.K.’s Supreme Court came after a yearslong legal fight over the definition of a woman in a 2010 equality law, and could have far-reaching implications for the protections and freedoms given to transgender women in the U.K.

 “The unanimous decision of this court is that the terms ‘woman’ and ‘sex’ in the Equality Act 2010 refer to biological women and biological sex,” said the court’s deputy president, Lord Hodge.

https://www.wsj.com/world/uk/u-k-suprem ... n-0db68e3a

Common senses prevails.

Millions of [[[JWO]]] brainwashed Libtards were just obeying what their [[[television sets]]] told them to think about this matter.
They couldn't help it........