Blackvegetable » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Rubio Says U.S. to Decide in Days if End to War in Ukraine Is ‘Doable
’“If it is not possible to end the war in Ukraine, we need to move on,” Secretary of State Marco Rubio said as he departed meetings in Paris.
http://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/18/us/bo ... trump.html
UNITED NATIONS (AP) — Donald Trump has repeatedly said he could settle the war between Russia and Ukraine in one day if he’s elected president again.
Here's hoping Pootie drops a certain video shortly...
Hey DickheadBlackvegetable » Today, 5:59 am » wrote: ↑ Rubio Says U.S. to Decide in Days if End to War in Ukraine Is ‘Doable
’“If it is not possible to end the war in Ukraine, we need to move on,” Secretary of State Marco Rubio said as he departed meetings in Paris.
http://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/18/us/bo ... trump.html
UNITED NATIONS (AP) — Donald Trump has repeatedly said he could settle the war between Russia and Ukraine in one day if he’s elected president again.
Here's hoping Pootie drops a certain video shortly...
Putin told tRumpco to **** offBlackvegetable » Today, 5:59 am » wrote: ↑ Rubio Says U.S. to Decide in Days if End to War in Ukraine Is ‘Doable
’“If it is not possible to end the war in Ukraine, we need to move on,” Secretary of State Marco Rubio said as he departed meetings in Paris.
http://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/18/us/bo ... trump.html
UNITED NATIONS (AP) — Donald Trump has repeatedly said he could settle the war between Russia and Ukraine in one day if he’s elected president again.
Here's hoping Pootie drops a certain video shortly...
After Harvard, Princeton and Columbia.Mrkelly » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Putin told tRumpco to **** off
Israel doesn’t care about Ukraine
so it’s off to Iran
Mr day one
Now that the Lincoln and Kennedy Centers are safe from homosexuals in the Performing Arts.
Another OP from Mary featuring a quote, a news link, a vague nod to global conflict, and of course… a final cryptic one-liner.Blackvegetable » Today, 5:59 am » wrote: ↑ Rubio Says U.S. to Decide in Days if End to War in Ukraine Is ‘Doable
’“If it is not possible to end the war in Ukraine, we need to move on,” Secretary of State Marco Rubio said as he departed meetings in Paris.
http://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/18/us/bo ... trump.html
UNITED NATIONS (AP) — Donald Trump has repeatedly said he could settle the war between Russia and Ukraine in one day if he’s elected president again.
Here's hoping Pootie drops a certain video shortly...
1. Post the title.You referenced the idea of ending the war in Ukraine as a “doable” decision in days. So what would a real, actionable U.S. policy look like to achieve that—beyond campaign slogans or vague “peace through strength” rhetoric?Specifically: What concessions would you support, and to whom?Or will this be another post ending in “Spell diplomacy, dimwit”?
Lol. No stupid ***. Here, let me narrow it down for you. Whatever your stupid liberal sources say ie...CNN, MSNBC, and your brainless legtwing blogs you love, if you take the complete opposite of what they tell you to think, then you will find the truth about Trump.Vegas » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Another OP from Mary featuring a quote, a news link, a vague nod to global conflict, and of course… a final cryptic one-liner.
For the forum, let's take a look at the Bloom’s Taxonomy breakdown:
Level 1 – Remembering:
He posts a quote and a link. Cool. Basic recall of a statement Rubio made. Nothing new.
Level 2 – Understanding:
Nope. No paraphrasing of what Rubio’s position means in the broader context of U.S. diplomacy. No explanation of implications. Just “Rubio said a thing.”
Level 3 – Applying:
Negative. He doesn’t apply the quote to real-world decisions, U.S. interests, or the complexities of ending the war. He just moves from citation to sarcasm.
Levels 4–6 (Analyzing, Evaluating, Creating):
Absolutely not. No weighing possible outcomes. No discussion of diplomatic strategy, NATO implications, or economic impact. Instead, he hints at “a certain video” like it’s some secret weapon hiding in Putin’s pocket.
Conclusion:
Level 1.5, generously. Basically a political meme wrapped in a hyperlink.
Follow-up Question (aka Dodge #112):
1. Post the title.![]()
Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Lol. No stupid ***. Here, let me narrow it down for you. Whatever your stupid liberal sources say ie...CNN, MSNBC, and your brainless legtwing blogs you love, if you take the complete opposite of what they tell you to think, then you will find the truth about Trump.
Let’s just take a moment here. You’ve got multiple quotes from me and Huey saved on your computer like we’re cold case files and you’re the forum’s unofficial FBI.
Confess you're a Narcissist.Vegas » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Let’s just take a moment here. You’ve got multiple quotes from me and Huey saved on your computer like we’re cold case files and you’re the forum’s unofficial FBI.
That’s not debating, Mary—that’s digital stalking with a side of scrapbook delusion.
Most people argue in real time. You’re over there digging through archives like you’re curating the VegasVagina and Huey Museum of Sin and Regret.
You’re not just obsessed. You’re organized about it. And that’s the creepiest part.
Confess? Mary, the only one who needs to confess is the guy with a hard drive full of Huey and VegasVagina quotes and a forum posting history that reads like a psychological case study.Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Confess you're a Narcissist.
Kill yourself.
Get back to me.
Do your rules apply to you?Vegas » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Confess? Mary, the only one who needs to confess is the guy with a hard drive full of Huey and VegasVagina quotes and a forum posting history that reads like a psychological case study.
You’re just mad the mirror’s pointing at you.
Post why you are owed 103 dodges.
The real question is:Why do you hide behind questions so much? You rarely respond. You almost never take a clear position. Instead, it’s always demands, interrogations, and deflections. You don’t debate—you just throw pop quizzes and hope no one grades yours.
I don't see an answer.Vegas » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑ Post why you are owed 103 dodges.
We’re back to the “rules don’t apply to narcissists” routine—right on cue. Mary, you’ve dodged over a hundred direct questions, reposted my quotes more times than you’ve formed your own thoughts, and now you’re demanding answers like you’re the moderator of reality itself.
Let me ask you something for once:
The real question is:
When will yours finally apply to you?
You're a moron.Vegas » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I have only seen 113 dodges from you. Post why I owe you an answer to anything.
Narcissist project daily.
Wow, brilliant. After 113 dodges, endless quote reposts, and a two-word attention span, your big comeback is… “You’re a moron.”
By now you should have seen it demonstrated again.Vegas » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Wow, brilliant. After 113 dodges, endless quote reposts, and a two-word attention span, your big comeback is… “You’re a moron.”
At this point, Mary, your posts aren’t arguments—they’re automated error messages.
Try again when you’ve got more than a sixth-grade insult and a broken Ctrl+V key.
1. Strike through tantrum.![]()