Liberal Forum

The executive order signed by Trump on April 9 called Krebs a "significant bad-faith actor who weaponized his Government authority." The order directed the attorney general to review Krebs' actions while director of CISA.

 Krebs has long maintained that the 2020 election was safe and secure, at odds with Trump who made false claims of election fraud. Krebs' defiance of Trump ultimately led to his firing in late 2020 as CISA director.



https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/live-up ... =120778912


Where's your line, Morans?

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

The executive order signed by Trump on April 9 called Krebs a "significant bad-faith actor who weaponized his Government authority." The order directed the attorney general to review Krebs' actions while director of CISA.

 Krebs has long maintained that the 2020 election was safe and secure, at odds with Trump who made false claims of election fraud. Krebs' defiance of Trump ultimately led to his firing in late 2020 as CISA director.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/live-up ... =120778912

Where's your line, Morans?

What're you whining about now, brown?
 

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

The executive order signed by Trump on April 9 called Krebs a "significant bad-faith actor who weaponized his Government authority." The order directed the attorney general to review Krebs' actions while director of CISA.

 Krebs has long maintained that the 2020 election was safe and secure, at odds with Trump who made false claims of election fraud. Krebs' defiance of Trump ultimately led to his firing in late 2020 as CISA director.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/live-up ... =120778912

Where's your line, Morans?

They don’t have a line

they just get in one
 

Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

The executive order signed by Trump on April 9 called Krebs a "significant bad-faith actor who weaponized his Government authority." The order directed the attorney general to review Krebs' actions while director of CISA.

 Krebs has long maintained that the 2020 election was safe and secure, at odds with Trump who made false claims of election fraud. Krebs' defiance of Trump ultimately led to his firing in late 2020 as CISA director.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/live-up ... =120778912

Where's your line, Morans?

what line?   Who is Morans?

ROG62 » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

What're you whining about now, brown?

*Huey avatar *Huey +2 1 minute ago

JuCo and sub-JuCo...


So **** g'ddammned stupid 

Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

The executive order signed by Trump on April 9 called Krebs a "significant bad-faith actor who weaponized his Government authority." The order directed the attorney general to review Krebs' actions while director of CISA.

 Krebs has long maintained that the 2020 election was safe and secure, at odds with Trump who made false claims of election fraud. Krebs' defiance of Trump ultimately led to his firing in late 2020 as CISA director.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/live-up ... =120778912

Where's your line, Morans?

Ah, classic Mary OP formula: a news link, a stripped-down summary, and a sarcastic jab that ends with "Morans" like it’s still 2004 and the joke hasn’t aged. Once again, no original analysis—just a “gotcha” tone wrapped in a question so he doesn’t have to take a position himself.

Bloom’s Taxonomy Breakdown:
Level 1 – Remembering:
You posted the news. This is all surface-level fact repetition.

Level 2 – Understanding:
Still missing. No explanation of why Krebs’ position matters, what the executive order implies about precedent or abuse of power, or how this compares to past administrations. It’s just “Trump bad, Krebs fired.”

Level 3 – Applying:
Nope. You didn't apply this to any broader legal or constitutional implications, election security trends, or political norms. You just toss the story out with a smirk and waits for reactions.

Levels 4–6 (Analyzing, Evaluating, Creating):
No context, no contrasting views, no deeper discussion. No proposed reforms, no critical evaluation of executive authority, and certainly no solutions. It’s basically a bumper sticker disguised as a thread.

Conclusion: This is Bloom’s Level 0.9, generously. The only thing elevated is the snark.

Question for Mary (aka Dodge #113, now boarding):

If Trump’s executive order is such a clear abuse of power, what specific reforms or checks would you propose to prevent similar misuse in future administrations—regardless of party?

 Or will we get the usual barrage of questions/demands, reposted quotes, and a CAPS LOCK insult?

Because we all know your real line is: never answer—only ask.
 

Vegas » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑

1 minute ago

Ah, classic

I'm good.

Vegas » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Ah, classic Mary OP formula: a news link, a stripped-down summary, and a sarcastic jab that ends with "Morans" like it’s still 2004 and the joke hasn’t aged. Once again, no original analysis—just a “gotcha” tone wrapped in a question so he doesn’t have to take a position himself.

Bloom’s Taxonomy Breakdown:
Level 1 – Remembering:
You posted the news. This is all surface-level fact repetition.

Level 2 – Understanding:
Still missing. No explanation of why Krebs’ position matters, what the executive order implies about precedent or abuse of power, or how this compares to past administrations. It’s just “Trump bad, Krebs fired.”

Level 3 – Applying:
Nope. You didn't apply this to any broader legal or constitutional implications, election security trends, or political norms. You just toss the story out with a smirk and waits for reactions.

Levels 4–6 (Analyzing, Evaluating, Creating):
No context, no contrasting views, no deeper discussion. No proposed reforms, no critical evaluation of executive authority, and certainly no solutions. It’s basically a bumper sticker disguised as a thread.

Conclusion: This is Bloom’s Level 0.9, generously. The only thing elevated is the snark.

Question for Mary (aka Dodge #113, now boarding):

 Or will we get the usual barrage of questions/demands, reposted quotes, and a CAPS LOCK insult?

Because we all know your real line is: never answer—only ask.

Level 2 – Understanding:Still missing. No explanation of why Krebs’ position matters, what the executive order implies about precedent or abuse of power, or how this compares to past administrations. It’s just “Trump bad, Krebs fired.”

a) you didn't read it....it isn't about him being fired, you stupid ****.

b) you are Level 0.16

 

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

I'm good.

    Uhhhhh.....no, actually you aren't. Classic Mary move. Read two words and then slam the eject button.

Mary’s legendary reading stamina: two words in and already tapping out.Still waiting on that answer, Professor Bloom’s Dropout.

Dodge 114 confirmed.

Blackvegetable » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

a) you didn't read it....it isn't about him being fired, you stupid ****.

b) you are Level 0.16

a) I read it. You just didn’t write anything worth analyzing beyond surface-level snark and a one-line insult to “Morans.” I don't see your analysis, only copy/paste ****.
b) You keep throwing around “Level 0.16” like it’s some devastating intellectual measure, but let’s be honest—you don’t even understand what Bloom’s Taxonomy is. You treat it like Yelp for arguments: 1 star = mad, 5 stars = own.
 Next time, maybe respond to the content instead of auto-screaming profanity and assigning random decimal ratings.

Or don’t.

Dodge 114 suits you nicely.

Blackvegetable » 31 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

31 minutes ago

The executive order signed by Trump on April 9 called Krebs a "significant bad-faith actor who weaponized his Government authority." The order directed the attorney general to review Krebs' actions while director of CISA.

 Krebs has long maintained that the 2020 election was safe and secure, at odds with Trump who made false claims of election fraud. Krebs' defiance of Trump ultimately led to his firing in late 2020 as CISA director.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/live-up ... =120778912

Where's your line, Morans?

Here's my response:
1. Trump did not make false claims of election fraud.  There was significant fraud by the Democrats in the 2020 presidential election.
2. Even if Trump did make a false claim about anything, even election fraud, this is neither illegal, an insurrection, or any indication of nefarious activity. It is but one example of freedom of speech. A man expressing an opinion, or presenting evidence, of something he believe occurred.
3. Trump has the authority to hire and fire people over the agencies with which he has been charged.  I see nothing wrong or unusual about his exercising his lawful and Constitutional-granted authority.

Now that I have analyzed and debunked any wrong doing by Trump in your above statements, I challenge you to rebut what I have said.  If you choose to deflect, ask stupid questions or provide any non-responsive rebuttal, I will duly note this and declare victory.  Contrarily, should you choose to actually rebut what my responses to your statements, I will not declare victory, but leave it up to the forum members to decide.
 

Vegas » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

a) I read it. You just didn’t write anything worth analyzing beyond surface-level snark and a one-line insult to “Morans.” I don't see your analysis, only copy/paste ****.
b) You keep throwing around “Level 0.16” like it’s some devastating intellectual measure, but let’s be honest—you don’t even understand what Bloom’s Taxonomy is. You treat it like Yelp for arguments: 1 star = mad, 5 stars = own.
 Next time, maybe respond to the content instead of auto-screaming profanity and assigning random decimal ratings.

Or don’t.

Dodge 114 suits you nicely.

a) what did Grifty's EO demand?

b) what is CISA
 

Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

a) what did Grifty's EO demand?

b) what is CISA

Omits a question mark             

There it is—Mary’s patented quiz dodge. Every time he's asked to defend his own OP, he responds like a frustrated substitute teacher with a clipboard full of stall tactics. We’ve seen this movie a hundred times:

a) He posts a thread
b) Gets asked a real question
c) Responds with two pop quizzes, one insult, and zero substance.

If you want to have a real conversation, try answering for once. Otherwise, just go ahead and laminate dodge 115. It’s practically tradition at this point. 

You still haven’t answered a single real question.

 Quizzes aren’t rebuttals. They’re just your last line of defense before another Ctrl+V meltdown. Keep dodging.

We’re well into the triple digits now.


1. He will now say "I don't see answers" while continue to ignore that he is at dodge # 115.
 

Blackvegetable » 52 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

52 minutes ago

The executive order signed by Trump on April 9 called Krebs a "significant bad-faith actor who weaponized his Government authority." The order directed the attorney general to review Krebs' actions while director of CISA.

 Krebs has long maintained that the 2020 election was safe and secure, at odds with Trump who made false claims of election fraud. Krebs' defiance of Trump ultimately led to his firing in late 2020 as CISA director.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/live-up ... =120778912

Where's your line, Morans?

Trump didn't make false claims, you **** who deny election fraud are gullible fools.

Skans » 24 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

24 minutes ago

Here's my response:
1. Trump did not make false claims of election fraud.  There was significant fraud by the Democrats in the 2020 presidential election.
2. Even if Trump did make a false claim about anything, even election fraud, this is neither illegal, an insurrection, or any indication of nefarious activity. It is but one example of freedom of speech. A man expressing an opinion, or presenting evidence, of something he believe occurred.
3. Trump has the authority to hire and fire people over the agencies with which he has been charged.  I see nothing wrong or unusual about his exercising his lawful and Constitutional-granted authority.

Now that I have analyzed and debunked any wrong doing by Trump in your above statements, I challenge you to rebut what I have said.  If you choose to deflect, ask stupid questions or provide any non-responsive rebuttal, I will duly note this and declare victory.  Contrarily, should you choose to actually rebut what my responses to your statements, I will not declare victory, but leave it up to the forum members to decide.

1. Trump did not make false claims of election fraud. There was significant fraud by the Democrats in the 2020 presidential election.2. Even if Trump did make a false claim about anything, even election fraud

Skans,

There's no point in debating a fantasiat.
 

RebelGator » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Trump didn't make false claims, you **** who deny election fraud are gullible fools.

Right.

Because we should take Grifty's word for it...
 

Vegas » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

22 minutes ago

Omits a question mark             

There it is—Mary’s patented quiz dodge. Every time he's asked to defend his own OP, he responds like a frustrated substitute teacher with a clipboard full of stall tactics. We’ve seen this movie a hundred times:

a) He posts a thread
b) Gets asked a real question
c) Responds with two pop quizzes, one insult, and zero substance.

If you want to have a real conversation, try answering for once. Otherwise, just go ahead and laminate dodge 115. It’s practically tradition at this point. 

You still haven’t answered a single real question.

 Quizzes aren’t rebuttals. They’re just your last line of defense before another Ctrl+V meltdown. Keep dodging.

We’re well into the triple digits now.

1. He will now say "I don't see answers" while continue to ignore that he is at dodge # 115.

There's nothing to rebut....I'm demonstrating that you're an idiot.

Your ignorance of CISA is another Level 0.16 merit badge.
 

Blackvegetable » 36 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

36 minutes ago

There's nothing to rebut....I'm demonstrating that you're an idiot.

Your ignorance of CISA is another Level 0.16 merit badge.

Ah, the classic Mary move: avoid the question, declare victory, and hand out another “Level 0.16” merit badge like it means something. You’re not demonstrating intelligence—you’re demonstrating how allergic you are to accountability.

 You didn’t refute anything. You just screamed “CISA” and hoped no one noticed you still haven’t answered a single real question from your own OP.

 Call it whatever level you want, Mary—just know the only thing we’re tracking is dodge #116.

1. Another dodge through question/demand.
2. Continue his cowardice. 

 
 

ROG62 » Today, 9:53 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:53 am

What're you whining about now, brown?

He wakes up every day full of optimism that TODAY IS THE DAY  his usual output of 120 **** Posts will surely "save our democracy"      

Vegas » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑

1 minute ago

Ah, the classic Mary move: avoid the question, declare victory, and hand out another “Level 0.16” merit badge like it means something. You’re not demonstrating intelligence—you’re demonstrating how allergic you are to accountability.

 You didn’t refute anything. You just screamed “CISA” and hoped no one noticed you still haven’t answered a single real question from your own OP.

 Call it whatever level you want, Mary—just know the only thing we’re tracking is dodge #116.

1. Another dodge through question/demand.
2. Continue his cowardice.

He wakes up every day full of optimism that TODAY IS THE DAY  his usual output of 120 **** Posts will surely "save our democracy"