Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 18 Apr 2025, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2025, 10:41 am

Skans,

There's no point in debating a fantasiat.

ANOTHER VICTORY FOR SKANS!
 

Vegas » 18 Apr 2025, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2025, 11:26 am

Ah, the classic Mary move: avoid the question, declare victory, and hand out another “Level 0.16” merit badge like it means something. You’re not demonstrating intelligence—you’re demonstrating how allergic you are to accountability.

 You didn’t refute anything. You just screamed “CISA” and hoped no one noticed you still haven’t answered a single real question from your own OP.

 Call it whatever level you want, Mary—just know the only thing we’re tracking is dodge #116.

1. Another dodge through question/demand.
2. Continue his cowardice.

You know NOTHING about this.

This is Political Chat, not Remedial Modern History...it assumes participants are informed of events...

It is not a stage for Narcissists. 


 

Blackvegetable » 18 Apr 2025, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2025, 11:55 am

You know NOTHING about this.

This is Political Chat, not Remedial Modern History...it assumes participants are informed of events...

It is not a stage for Narcissists.

 

It is not a stage for Narcissists. 

So why are you here?

Blackvegetable » 18 Apr 2025, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2025, 11:55 am

You know NOTHING about this.

This is Political Chat, not Remedial Modern History...it assumes participants are informed of events...

It is not a stage for Narcissists.

Ah, so we're back to “You know NOTHING!” which is rich coming from someone who’s posted exactly zero original thoughts on the very topic he's now policing.

You’ve offered no analysis, no insight, no actual stance—just copy-paste links, sarcasm, and quiz questions to cover the void.

So if Political Chat “assumes participants are informed,” then let me ask: where’s your proof you are? Because so far, your posts suggest the only thing you’re informed about is my quote history.

Still waiting for an answer, Mary. But hey—feel free to dodge into #117 and call it a masterclass.
 

Blackvegetable » 18 Apr 2025, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2025, 9:50 am

After extensive self -reflection, I would like to share my latest journal entry: 

I shout, “You know nothing!” with chest held high,
While dodging real questions and quoting old replies.
No thoughts of my own, just echoes and games,
Yet I swear I am the sharpest of all the usernames.

 I cry “Narcissist!” with theatrical flair,
Then I hide behind tactics pulled straight from thin air.
I accuse others of dodging while ducking all day—
Dodge 115? Just my Monday display.

Wow. I am proud of your introspection. Well done. ^^^

Your act of metacognition is inspiring. Especially from a narcissist. 
 
 

*Huey » 18 Apr 2025, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2025, 12:23 pm

So why are you here?

No...YOU are, Frediñho 
 

Vegas » 18 Apr 2025, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2025, 12:39 pm

Ah, so we're back to “You know NOTHING!” which is rich coming from someone who’s posted exactly zero original thoughts on the very topic he's now policing.

You’ve offered no analysis, no insight, no actual stance—just copy-paste links, sarcasm, and quiz questions to cover the void.

So if Political Chat “assumes participants are informed,” then let me ask: where’s your proof you are? Because so far, your posts suggest the only thing you’re informed about is my quote history.

Still waiting for an answer, Mary. But hey—feel free to dodge into #117 and call it a masterclass.

It's  a constant.

You are Level 0.16...
 

Vegas » 18 Apr 2025, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2025, 12:49 pm

Wow. I am such a loser....I should stop tantrumstalking and kill myself...I'll never lay a glove on him.

I'll wind up on percs&Canadian Club under a porch like that other @*....Vagina....
 

Aim high!

Blackvegetable » 18 Apr 2025, 1:22 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2025, 1:22 pm

It's  a constant.

You are Level 0.16...

      There is the strike through tantrum. Dodge 116. 

Vegas » 18 Apr 2025, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2025, 1:45 pm

      There is the strike through tantrum. Dodge 116.

Your fictions, like your threads, suck.


 

Blackvegetable » 18 Apr 2025, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2025, 1:47 pm

Your fictions, like your threads, suck.

Yet, your level 2+ of refutation is "you are a **** moron." 

Vegas » 18 Apr 2025, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2025, 1:54 pm

Yet, your level 2+ of refutation is "you are a **** moron."

No...it's demonstrating that you are Level 0.16..

There were 2 paragraphs....and you couldn't understand them.
 

Blackvegetable » 18 Apr 2025, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2025, 2:01 pm

No...it's demonstrating that you are Level 0.16..

There were 2 paragraphs....and you couldn't understand them.

This game again. Always the same game. You couldn't answer the questions because you don't understand what you are posting. 

Vegas » 18 Apr 2025, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2025, 2:04 pm

This game again. Always the same game. You couldn't answer the questions because you don't understand what you are posting.

You have no clue what it is about and couldn't even get the facts in the two paragraphs correct.

You're 4 years behind.

You're literally an idiot.
 

Blackvegetable » 18 Apr 2025, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2025, 2:07 pm

You have no clue what it is about and couldn't even get the facts in the two paragraphs correct.

You're 4 years behind.

You're literally an idiot.

Post your level 2+ original thoughts of what you posted. No games. No projections. No gaslighting. No dishonesty. 

 

Vegas » 18 Apr 2025, 2:09 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2025, 2:09 pm

Post your level 2+ original thoughts of what you posted. No games. No projections. No gaslighting. No dishonesty.

Demonstrate a Level 1 grasp of the information provided.

If you can't, find a crafts forum.
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 18 Apr 2025, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2025, 11:27 am

He wakes up every day full of optimism that TODAY IS THE DAY  his usual output of 120 **** Posts will surely "save our democracy"    

 

ROG62 » 18 Apr 2025, 5:42 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2025, 5:42 pm

You rubes have got this...

ROG62 » 18 Apr 2025, 5:42 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2025, 5:42 pm

In order for him to do that the ****** will have to take a stand on issues.  Orange man bad is not a stand on issues.

*Huey » 19 Apr 2025, 8:11 am » wrote: ↑

19 Apr 2025, 8:11 am

In order for him to do that the ****** will have to take a stand on issues.  Orange man bad is not a stand on issues.

If my stands on issues aren't so clear, and clearly offensive, why do you wake up melty every day?