You rang?Vegas » Today, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑ Back to his strikethrough tantrum. Still won't defend his OP. Still refuses to truthfully acknowledge why he is owed 121 dodges. The cowardice is real.
1. Watch him hide again....question/demand....question/demand...question/demand....still won't answer the questions.
There's no rule...
Copies me again. More evidence of his lack of thoughts.
Responds with hypocrisyVegas » Today, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑ Copies me again. More evidence of his lack of thoughts.
Post why you are owed 121 dodges, hypocrite boy.
1. More stalking
Who cares? There is no rule against me taunting you for your tantrum either.
Vegas » Today, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑ More stalking. More evidence that he has no thoughts of his own ^^^
Why Narcissists Copy Others:
Responds with hypocrisyVegas » Today, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑ Who cares? There is no rule against me taunting you for your tantrum either.
Continues to respond with hypocrisy.
Responds with hypocrisyVegas » Today, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑ Continues to respond with hypocrisy.
Copies me again. More evidence of his lack of thoughts.
Post why you are owed 121 dodges, hypocrite boy.
1. More stalking
Which post did you address it directly? I don't see a stand where you either support or you don't support biological males participating in female sports leagues.Blackvegetable » Today, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑ This isn't the first time you've called yourself a liar..
Already addressed That.*Huey » Today, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑ Which post did you address it directly? I don't see a stand where you either support or you don't support biological males participating in female sports leagues.
Which post did you address it directly? I don't see a stand where you either support or you don't support biological males participating in female sports leagues.
Are these your words?*Huey » Today, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑ Which post did you address it directly? I don't see a stand where you either support or you don't support biological males participating in female sports leagues.
What informs them?And your weak stand has always been let sanctioning body regulate it.
Is that your stand? Run, ******, Run. Yes or no?Blackvegetable » Today, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑ Are these your words?
What informs them?
You've answered your question.
Why do you refuse to address your own confirmation?
Is that your stand? Yes or no?