You rang?Vegas » 22 Apr 2025, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑ Back to his strikethrough tantrum. Still won't defend his OP. Still refuses to truthfully acknowledge why he is owed 121 dodges. The cowardice is real.
1. Watch him hide again....question/demand....question/demand...question/demand....still won't answer the questions.
There's no rule...
Copies me again. More evidence of his lack of thoughts.Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2025, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑ Responds with hypocrisy
It's " Set It's & Forget It"
Responds with hypocrisyVegas » 22 Apr 2025, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑ Copies me again. More evidence of his lack of thoughts.
Post why you are owed 121 dodges, hypocrite boy.
1. More stalking
Who cares? There is no rule against me taunting you for your tantrum either.
Vegas » 22 Apr 2025, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑ More stalking. More evidence that he has no thoughts of his own ^^^
Why Narcissists Copy Others:
Responds with hypocrisyVegas » 22 Apr 2025, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑ Who cares? There is no rule against me taunting you for your tantrum either.
Continues to respond with hypocrisy.
Responds with hypocrisyVegas » 22 Apr 2025, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑ Continues to respond with hypocrisy.
Copies me again. More evidence of his lack of thoughts.
Post why you are owed 121 dodges, hypocrite boy.
1. More stalking
Which post did you address it directly? I don't see a stand where you either support or you don't support biological males participating in female sports leagues.Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2025, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑ This isn't the first time you've called yourself a liar..
Already addressed That.*Huey » 22 Apr 2025, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑ Which post did you address it directly? I don't see a stand where you either support or you don't support biological males participating in female sports leagues.
Which post did you address it directly? I don't see a stand where you either support or you don't support biological males participating in female sports leagues.
Are these your words?*Huey » 22 Apr 2025, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑ Which post did you address it directly? I don't see a stand where you either support or you don't support biological males participating in female sports leagues.
What informs them?And your weak stand has always been let sanctioning body regulate it.
Is that your stand? Run, ******, Run. Yes or no?Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2025, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑ Are these your words?
What informs them?
You've answered your question.
Why do you refuse to address your own confirmation?
Is that your stand? Yes or no?Blackvegetable » 22 Apr 2025, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑ Why do you refuse to address your own confirmation?