Liberal Forum

*Huey » 23 Apr 2025, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2025, 10:10 am

You did not show I lied.  You ASSERTED I lied.

You really did not take a firm stance on whether or not males should be allowed to participate in women's sports.  You are OK if they allow it.  So no, you do not support women's rights in sports.

I posted your lies, in your words.

You know they are your words because you immediately ran from them.
 

*Huey » 23 Apr 2025, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2025, 10:08 am

After  you prove to me you understand it I will consider answering one or two of your questions.

You requested an explanation..

I don't owe you anything for offering one.


You're a **** idiot.

Vegas » 23 Apr 2025, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2025, 10:11 am

        You dumb mother ****.

No answer..

Level 0.16...
 

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2025, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2025, 10:14 am

No answer..

Level 0.16...

Post why anyone is obligated to answer a stupid question. 

Vegas » 23 Apr 2025, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2025, 10:15 am

Post why anyone is obligated to answer a stupid question.

In this case, because you can’t prove you aren't a moron.

 

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2025, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2025, 10:17 am

In this case, because you can’t prove you aren't a moron.

Coming from the person who just asked the dumbest question since this forum has been around.       


Pot...kettle...black.

Vegas » 23 Apr 2025, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2025, 10:19 am

Coming from the person who just asked the dumbest question since this forum has been around.       

Pot...kettle...black.

Then answer it.

Just get it over with.
 

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2025, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2025, 10:21 am

Then answer it.

Just get it over with.

How many dodges are owed? 118 more. Coward. 

Hey I came up with another nickname that suits you. Since you are a fake Socrates with all of your incessant questions and a fraud, then this is perfect: 

Grifticles – A hybrid of grifter + Sophist + spectacle. Your philosophical Pokémon form.
 

Vegas » 23 Apr 2025, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2025, 10:26 am

How many dodges are owed? 118 more. Coward. 

Hey I came up with another nickname that suits you. Since you are a fake Socrates with all of your incessant questions and a fraud, then this is perfect: 

Grifticles – A hybrid of grifter + Sophist + spectacle. Your philosophical Pokémon form.

Then admit that you don't know.

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2025, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2025, 10:29 am

Then admit that you don't know.

      Weak efforts. Very weak. Keep trying. 

 

Vegas » 23 Apr 2025, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2025, 10:30 am

      Weak efforts. Very weak. Keep trying.

You're the only one believing you know....and you know you're a liar.

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2025, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2025, 10:31 am

You're the only one believing you know....and you know you're a liar.

    Grifticles is bitter and desperate. 

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2025, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2025, 10:11 am

I posted your lies, in your words.

You know they are your words because you immediately ran from them.

No, you didn't.  Try harder.  

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2025, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2025, 10:13 am

You requested an explanation..

I don't owe you anything for offering one.


You're a **** idiot.

 

I accept the fact you can't prove you understand it.  
 

*Huey » 23 Apr 2025, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2025, 10:34 am

I accept the fact you can't prove you understand it.

YOU'RE the one who asked to have it explained.


 

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2025, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2025, 10:36 am

YOU'RE the one who asked to have it explained.

Yet YOU can't explain the definition of a woman

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2025, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2025, 9:51 am

To whose thread are we referring?

Grifticles has once again stunned the forum with his Socratic questioning.     

*Huey » 23 Apr 2025, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2025, 10:33 am

No, you didn't.  Try harder.

Tiny,

The problem remains the same as it was yesterday.

I can't oblige you to acknowledge your words.
 

Blackvegetable » 23 Apr 2025, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2025, 10:37 am

Tiny,

The problem remains the same as it was yesterday.

I can't oblige you to acknowledge your words.

You know how to do it.  Just use the reply function and NO edits.  You 'd be amazed how fast you get a response. 

*Huey » 23 Apr 2025, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2025, 10:40 am

You know how to do it.  Just use the reply function and NO edits.  You 'd be amazed how fast you get a response.

No...your words are your words.

This isn’t like you restating mine.

I'm not here to indulge your ****** excuses.